283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23538888)
21. A method for determining the modulation transfer function from thick microwire profiles measured with x-ray microcomputed tomography.
Nakaya Y; Kawata Y; Niki N; Umetatni K; Ohmatsu H; Moriyama N
Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7):4347-64. PubMed ID: 22830768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Performance of cone-beam computed tomography and multidetector computed tomography in diagnostic imaging of the midface: A comparative study on Phantom and cadaver head scans.
Veldhoen S; Schöllchen M; Hanken H; Precht C; Henes FO; Schön G; Nagel HD; Schumacher U; Heiland M; Adam G; Regier M
Eur Radiol; 2017 Feb; 27(2):790-800. PubMed ID: 27169574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Voxel-Based Sensitivity of Flat-Panel CT for the Detection of Intracranial Hemorrhage: Comparison to Multi-Detector CT.
Frölich AM; Buhk JH; Fiehler J; Kemmling A
PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0165794. PubMed ID: 27806106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Image quality of an investigational imaging panel for use with the imaging beam line cone-beam CT.
Beltran C
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2012 Jan; 13(1):3607. PubMed ID: 22231211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Relationships of clinical protocols and reconstruction kernels with image quality and radiation dose in a 128-slice CT scanner: study with an anthropomorphic and water phantom.
Paul J; Krauss B; Banckwitz R; Maentele W; Bauer RW; Vogl TJ
Eur J Radiol; 2012 May; 81(5):e699-703. PubMed ID: 21316888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Initial phantom study comparing image quality in computed tomography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and new adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction v.
Lim K; Kwon H; Cho J; Oh J; Yoon S; Kang M; Ha D; Lee J; Kang E
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(3):443-8. PubMed ID: 25654782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Ultra-low-dose computed tomography system with a flat panel detector: assessment of radiation dose reduction and spatial and low contrast resolution.
Nagatani Y; Nitta N; Takahashi M; Tezuka N; Nakano Y; Ikeda M; Kirino Y; Hashimoto K; Otani H; Murakami Y; Murata K
Radiat Med; 2008 Dec; 26(10):627-35. PubMed ID: 19132496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Using a flat-panel detector in high resolution cone beam CT for dental imaging.
Baba R; Ueda K; Okabe M
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Sep; 33(5):285-90. PubMed ID: 15585803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Flat-panel-detector-based volumetric CT: performance evaluation of imaging for skeletal structures of small animals in comparison to multislice CT.
Obenauer S; Dullin C; Alves F; Missbach-Guentner J; Grabbe E; Heuser M
Clin Imaging; 2007; 31(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 17189841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Relating noise to image quality indicators in CT examinations with tube current modulation.
Solomon JB; Li X; Samei E
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Mar; 200(3):592-600. PubMed ID: 23436849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Flat-panel detector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery stents: phantom study in comparison with 16-slice spiral computed tomography.
Mahnken AH; Seyfarth T; Flohr T; Herzog C; Stahl J; Stanzel S; Kuettner A; Wildberger JE; Günther RW
Invest Radiol; 2005 Jan; 40(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 15597014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Optimizing radiation dose parameters in MDCT arthrography of the shoulder: illustration of basic concepts in a cadaveric study.
Aguet J; Becce F; Dunet V; Vlassenbroek A; Coche EE; Omoumi P
Skeletal Radiol; 2019 Aug; 48(8):1261-1268. PubMed ID: 30725159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Cone-beam computed tomography with a flat-panel imager: magnitude and effects of x-ray scatter.
Siewerdsen JH; Jaffray DA
Med Phys; 2001 Feb; 28(2):220-31. PubMed ID: 11243347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. 256-MSCT image acquisition with sequential axial scans: evaluation of image quality and resolution in a phantom study.
Klink T; Nagel H; Schwartz B; Regier M; Adam G; Begemann PG
Rofo; 2012 Mar; 184(3):248-55. PubMed ID: 22290248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Flat panel computed tomography of human ex vivo heart and bone specimens: initial experience.
Nikolaou K; Flohr T; Stierstorfer K; Becker CR; Reiser MF
Eur Radiol; 2005 Feb; 15(2):329-33. PubMed ID: 15662479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Optimization of computed tomography (CT) arthrography of hip for the visualization of cartilage: an in vitro study.
Simoni P; Leyder PP; Albert A; Malchair F; Maréchal C; Scarciolla L; Beomonte Zobel B; Alvarez Miezentseva V; Gillet P
Skeletal Radiol; 2014 Feb; 43(2):169-78. PubMed ID: 24281772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A flat-panel detector based micro-CT system: performance evaluation for small-animal imaging.
Lee SC; Kim HK; Chun IK; Cho MH; Lee SY; Cho MH
Phys Med Biol; 2003 Dec; 48(24):4173-85. PubMed ID: 14727760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A quality assurance phantom for the performance evaluation of volumetric micro-CT systems.
Du LY; Umoh J; Nikolov HN; Pollmann SI; Lee TY; Holdsworth DW
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Dec; 52(23):7087-108. PubMed ID: 18029995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Flat panel detector-based volumetric computed tomography (fpVCT): performance evaluation of volumetric methods by using different phantoms in comparison to 64-multislice computed tomography.
Obenauer S; Dullin C; Heuser M
Invest Radiol; 2007 May; 42(5):291-6. PubMed ID: 17414524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Flat-Panel CT for Cochlear Implant Electrode Imaging: Comparison to Multi-Detector CT.
Kennedy TA; Connell N; Szczykutowicz T; Schafer S; Royalty K; Nace S; Gartrell B; Gubbels S
Otol Neurotol; 2016 Dec; 37(10):1646-1653. PubMed ID: 27668790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
