These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23539124)

  • 1. A review of current fixation use and registry outcomes in total hip arthroplasty: the uncemented paradox.
    Troelsen A; Malchau E; Sillesen N; Malchau H
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2013 Jul; 471(7):2052-9. PubMed ID: 23539124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Has the Use of Fixation Techniques in THA Changed in This Decade? The Uncemented Paradox Revisited.
    Bunyoz KI; Malchau E; Malchau H; Troelsen A
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Apr; 478(4):697-704. PubMed ID: 31899744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Do Rerevision Rates Differ After First-time Revision of Primary THA With a Cemented and Cementless Femoral Component?
    Gromov K; Pedersen AB; Overgaard S; Gebuhr P; Malchau H; Troelsen A
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3391-8. PubMed ID: 25762017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Editor's spotlight/Take 5: A review of current fixation usage and registry outcomes in total hip arthroplasty: the uncemented paradox [DOI 10.1007/s11999-013-2941-7]. Interview by Seth S. Leopold.
    Troelsen A; Malchau H
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2013 Jul; 471(7):2047-51. PubMed ID: 23637057
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Influence of the Type of Hip-Component Fixation and Age of Patients on Mid-Term Revision Rate of Total Hip Replacement].
    Kubinec V
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2018; 85(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 30257769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fixation, sex, and age: highest risk of revision for uncemented stems in elderly women - data from 66,995 primary total hip arthroplasties in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.
    Dale H; Børsheim S; Kristensen TB; Fenstad AM; Gjertsen JE; Hallan G; Lie SA; Furnes O
    Acta Orthop; 2020 Feb; 91(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 31663413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improved survival of uncemented versus cemented femoral stems in patients aged < 70 years in a community total joint registry.
    Wechter J; Comfort TK; Tatman P; Mehle S; Gioe TJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2013 Nov; 471(11):3588-95. PubMed ID: 23873609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hybrid Fixation for Total Hip Arthroplasty Showed Improved Survival Over Cemented and Uncemented Fixation: A Single-Center Survival Analysis of 2156 Hips at 12-18 Years.
    Fowler AK; Gray AR; Gwynne-Jones DP
    J Arthroplasty; 2019 Nov; 34(11):2711-2717. PubMed ID: 31301914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Uncemented and cemented primary total hip arthroplasty in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.
    Hailer NP; Garellick G; Kärrholm J
    Acta Orthop; 2010 Feb; 81(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 20180715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Despite Improved Survivorship of Uncemented Fixation in Total Knee Arthroplasty for Osteoarthritis, Cemented Fixation Remains the Gold Standard: An Analysis of a National Joint Registry.
    Nugent M; Wyatt MC; Frampton CM; Hooper GJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2019 Aug; 34(8):1626-1633. PubMed ID: 31031155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing modern uncemented, hybrid and cemented implant combinations in older patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty, a New Zealand Joint Registry study.
    Boyle AB; Zhu M; Frampton C; Poutawera V; Vane A
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2023 Jun; 143(6):3597-3604. PubMed ID: 36102955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Revision following cemented and uncemented primary total hip replacement: a seven-year analysis from the New Zealand Joint Registry.
    Hooper GJ; Rothwell AG; Stringer M; Frampton C
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 Apr; 91(4):451-8. PubMed ID: 19336803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fixation Method and Subsequent Revision Rates for Elective Primary Hip Arthroplasty in People Aged 70 Years and Older: Analysis of National Administrative Data Sets by the UK Getting It Right First Time Program.
    Gray WK; Day J; Barker M; Briggs TWR
    J Arthroplasty; 2020 Dec; 35(12):3631-3637. PubMed ID: 32703709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evidence for cemented TKA and THA based on a comparison of international register data.
    Humez M; Kötter K; Skripitz R; Kühn KD
    Orthopadie (Heidelb); 2024 Aug; 53(8):597-607. PubMed ID: 38568216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparing uncemented, hybrid and cemented primary total hip arthroplasty in young patients, a New Zealand Joint Registry study.
    Boyle AB; Zhu M; Frampton C; Vane A; Poutawera V
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2022 Sep; 142(9):2371-2380. PubMed ID: 34319471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of the type of stem and its fixation on revision and immediate postoperative mortality in elective total hip arthroplasty.
    Morlock M; Perka C; Melsheimer O; Kirschbaum SM
    Bone Joint J; 2024 Mar; 106-B(3 Supple A):130-136. PubMed ID: 38423088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is Cemented or Cementless Femoral Stem Fixation More Durable in Patients Older Than 75 Years of Age? A Comparison of the Best-performing Stems.
    Tanzer M; Graves SE; Peng A; Shimmin AJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Jul; 476(7):1428-1437. PubMed ID: 29683803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Increased risk of intraoperative and early postoperative periprosthetic femoral fracture with uncemented stems.
    Lindberg-Larsen M; Jørgensen CC; Solgaard S; Kjersgaard AG; Kehlet H;
    Acta Orthop; 2017 Aug; 88(4):390-394. PubMed ID: 28290738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does cement increase the risk of infection in primary total hip arthroplasty? Revision rates in 56,275 cemented and uncemented primary THAs followed for 0-16 years in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.
    Engesaeter LB; Espehaug B; Lie SA; Furnes O; Havelin LI
    Acta Orthop; 2006 Jun; 77(3):351-8. PubMed ID: 16819671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Method of fixation does not influence the overall risk of rerevision in first-time cup revisions.
    Mohaddes M; Garellick G; Kärrholm J
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2013 Dec; 471(12):3922-31. PubMed ID: 23440618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.