These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23539242)

  • 1. Tangibles, Pictures, and Verbal Descriptions: Which Should Be Used in Choice Presentations?
    Yu CT; Martin GL
    J Dev Disabl; 2003; 10(1):137-140. PubMed ID: 23539242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predicting the relative efficacy of verbal, pictorial, and tangible stimuli for assessing preferences of leisure activities.
    de Vries C; Yu CT; Sakko G; Wirth KM; Walters KL; Marion C; Martin GL
    Am J Ment Retard; 2005 Mar; 110(2):145-54. PubMed ID: 15762824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Discrimination Skills Predict Effective Preference Assessment Methods for Adults with Developmental Disabilities.
    Lee MS; Nguyen D; Yu CT; Thorsteinsson JR; Martin TL; Martin GL
    Educ Train Dev Disabil; 2008 Sep; 43(3):388-396. PubMed ID: 23536743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The hierarchical relationship between several visual and auditory discriminations and three verbal operants among individuals with developmental disabilities.
    Marion C; Vause T; Harapiak S; Martin GL; Yu CT; Sakko G; Walters KL
    Anal Verbal Behav; 2003; 19():91-105. PubMed ID: 22477257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The assessment of basic learning abilities test for predicting learning of persons with intellectual disabilities: a review.
    Martin GL; Thorsteinsson JR; Yu CT; Martin TL; Vause T
    Behav Modif; 2008 Mar; 32(2):228-47. PubMed ID: 18285508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predicting the relative efficacy of three presentation methods for assessing preferences of persons with developmental disabilities.
    Conyers C; Doole A; Vause T; Harapiak S; Yu DC; Martin GL
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2002; 35(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 11936545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Assessment of Basic Learning Abilities (ABLA) test predicts the relative efficacy of task preferences for persons with developmental disabilities.
    Reyer HS; Sturmey P
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 2006 Jun; 50(Pt 6):404-9. PubMed ID: 16672034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does ABLA Test Performance on the ABLA Test Predict Picture Receptive Name Recognition with Persons with Severe Developmental Disabilities.
    Verbeke AK; Martin GL; Yu CT; Martin TL
    Anal Verbal Behav; 2007; 23(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 22477379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Memory for modality of presentation: Within-modality discrimination.
    Light LL; Stansbury C; Rubin C; Linde S
    Mem Cognit; 1973 Sep; 1(3):395-400. PubMed ID: 24214575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing preferences of individuals with acquired brain injury using alternative stimulus modalities.
    Heinicke MR; Carr JE; Eastridge D; Kupfer J; Mozzoni MP
    Brain Inj; 2013; 27(1):48-59. PubMed ID: 23252436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual-visual nonidentity matching assessment: a worthwhile addition to the assessment of basic learning abilities test.
    Sakko G; Martin TL; Vause T; Martin GL; Yu CT
    Am J Ment Retard; 2004 Jan; 109(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 14651450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Observational learning and the formation of classes of reading skills by individuals with autism and other developmental disabilities.
    Rehfeldt RA; Latimore D; Stromer R
    Res Dev Disabil; 2003; 24(5):333-58. PubMed ID: 12951131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stimulus modality and working memory performance in Greek children with reading disabilities: additional evidence for the pictorial superiority hypothesis.
    Constantinidou F; Evripidou C
    Child Neuropsychol; 2012; 18(3):256-80. PubMed ID: 21942734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Verbal and novel multisensory associative learning in adults.
    Fifer JM; Barutchu A; Shivdasani MN; Crewther SG
    F1000Res; 2013; 2():34. PubMed ID: 24627770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Procedural learning and retention of audio-verbal temporal sequence is altered in children with developmental coordination disorder but cortical thickness matters.
    Lê M; Blais M; Jucla M; Chauveau N; Maziero S; Biotteau M; Albaret JM; Péran P; Chaix Y; Tallet J
    Dev Sci; 2021 Jan; 24(1):e13009. PubMed ID: 32573893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assisting older adults with severe disabilities in expressing leisure preferences: a protocol for determining choice-making skills.
    Parsons MB; Harper VN; Jensen JM; Reid DH
    Res Dev Disabil; 1997; 18(2):113-26. PubMed ID: 9172280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bimodal Presentation Speeds up Auditory Processing and Slows Down Visual Processing.
    Robinson CW; Moore RL; Crook TA
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():2454. PubMed ID: 30568624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing preferences of individuals with developmental disabilities using alternative stimulus modalities: A systematic review.
    Heinicke MR; Carr JE; Copsey CJ
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2019 Jul; 52(3):847-869. PubMed ID: 31045241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of visual demonstration, verbal instructions, and prompted verbal descriptions on the performance of human subjects in conditional discriminations.
    Ribes-Iñesta E; Cepeda ML; Hickman H; Moreno D; Peñalosa E
    Anal Verbal Behav; 1992; 10():23-36. PubMed ID: 22477044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Case Study of Visual Agnosia without Perceptual Processing or Structural Descriptions Impairment.
    Fery P; Morais J
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2003 Oct; 20(7):595-618. PubMed ID: 20957586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.