These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23540724)

  • 21. Anterior thoracic posture increases thoracolumbar disc loading.
    Harrison DE; Colloca CJ; Harrison DD; Janik TJ; Haas JW; Keller TS
    Eur Spine J; 2005 Apr; 14(3):234-42. PubMed ID: 15168237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. In situ contact analysis of the prosthesis components of Prodisc-L in lumbar spine following total disc replacement.
    Chen WM; Park C; Lee K; Lee S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Sep; 34(20):E716-23. PubMed ID: 19752690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. ISSLS prize winner: A novel approach to determine trunk muscle forces during flexion and extension: a comparison of data from an in vitro experiment and in vivo measurements.
    Wilke HJ; Rohlmann A; Neller S; Graichen F; Claes L; Bergmann G
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Dec; 28(23):2585-93. PubMed ID: 14652475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Experimental flexion/extension data corridors for validation of finite element models of the young, normal cervical spine.
    Wheeldon JA; Pintar FA; Knowles S; Yoganandan N
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(2):375-80. PubMed ID: 16321642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Total disc replacement positioning affects facet contact forces and vertebral body strains.
    Rundell SA; Auerbach JD; Balderston RA; Kurtz SM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Nov; 33(23):2510-7. PubMed ID: 18978591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Models that incorporate spinal structures predict better wear performance of cervical artificial discs.
    Bhattacharya S; Goel VK; Liu X; Kiapour A; Serhan HA
    Spine J; 2011 Aug; 11(8):766-76. PubMed ID: 21802999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Interaction between finite helical axes and facet joint forces under combined loading.
    Schmidt H; Heuer F; Wilke HJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Dec; 33(25):2741-8. PubMed ID: 19050579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of four methods to simulate swelling in poroelastic finite element models of intervertebral discs.
    Galbusera F; Schmidt H; Noailly J; Malandrino A; Lacroix D; Wilke HJ; Shirazi-Adl A
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2011 Oct; 4(7):1234-41. PubMed ID: 21783132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Sensitivity of intervertebral joint forces to center of rotation location and trends along its migration path.
    Senteler M; Aiyangar A; Weisse B; Farshad M; Snedeker JG
    J Biomech; 2018 Mar; 70():140-148. PubMed ID: 29191633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Influence of the geometry of a ball-and-socket intervertebral prosthesis at the cervical spine: a finite element study.
    Rousseau MA; Bonnet X; Skalli W
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(1):E10-4. PubMed ID: 18165735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Finite element modeling of cervical laminectomy with graded facetectomy.
    Kumaresan S; Yoganandan N; Pintar FA; Voo LM; Cusick JF; Larson SJ
    J Spinal Disord; 1997 Feb; 10(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 9041495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Biomechanics of two-level Charité artificial disc placement in comparison to fusion plus single-level disc placement combination.
    Grauer JN; Biyani A; Faizan A; Kiapour A; Sairyo K; Ivanov A; Ebraheim NA; Patel TCh; Goel VK
    Spine J; 2006; 6(6):659-66. PubMed ID: 17088196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Biomechanical evaluation of a new total posterior-element replacement system.
    Wilke HJ; Schmidt H; Werner K; Schmölz W; Drumm J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Nov; 31(24):2790-6; discussion 2797. PubMed ID: 17108830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Use of the finite element method to study the mechanism of spinal cord injury without radiological abnormality in the cervical spine.
    Imajo Y; Hiiragi I; Kato Y; Taguchi T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(2):E83-7. PubMed ID: 19139658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Application of the polynomial chaos expansion to approximate the homogenised response of the intervertebral disc.
    Karajan N; Otto D; Oladyshkin S; Ehlers W
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2014 Oct; 13(5):1065-80. PubMed ID: 24553971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of the rib cage on thoracic spine flexibility.
    Sham ML; Zander T; Rohlmann A; Bergmann G
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2005 Nov; 50(11):361-5. PubMed ID: 16370149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Finite element modeling of multi-level cervical spinal segments (C3-C6) and biomechanical analysis of an elastomer-type prosthetic disc.
    Ha SK
    Med Eng Phys; 2006 Jul; 28(6):534-41. PubMed ID: 16278091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of trunk muscle forces and spinal loads estimated by two biomechanical models.
    Arjmand N; Gagnon D; Plamondon A; Shirazi-Adl A; Larivière C
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Aug; 24(7):533-41. PubMed ID: 19493597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of nonlinearity in the materials used for the semi-rigid pedicle screw systems on biomechanical behaviors of the lumbar spine after surgery.
    Kim H; Lim DH; Oh HJ; Lee KY; Lee SJ
    Biomed Mater; 2011 Oct; 6(5):055005. PubMed ID: 21849724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Biomechanical study of pediatric human cervical spine: a finite element approach.
    Kumaresan S; Yoganandan N; Pintar FA; Maiman DJ; Kuppa S
    J Biomech Eng; 2000 Feb; 122(1):60-71. PubMed ID: 10790831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.