These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23541100)

  • 1. Validity of COSMED's quark CPET mixing chamber system in evaluating energy metabolism during aerobic exercise in healthy male adults.
    Nieman DC; Austin MD; Dew D; Utter AC
    Res Sports Med; 2013; 21(2):136-45. PubMed ID: 23541100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validation of Cosmed's FitMate in measuring exercise metabolism.
    Nieman DC; Lasasso H; Austin MD; Pearce S; McInnis T; Unick J
    Res Sports Med; 2007; 15(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 17365953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of COSMED metabolic systems for the determination of resting metabolic rate.
    Vandarakis D; Salacinski AJ; Broeder CE
    Res Sports Med; 2013; 21(2):187-94. PubMed ID: 23541105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation of Cosmed's FitMate in measuring oxygen consumption and estimating resting metabolic rate.
    Nieman DC; Austin MD; Benezra L; Pearce S; McInnis T; Unick J; Gross SJ
    Res Sports Med; 2006; 14(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 16869134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy and precision of CPET equipment: a comparison of breath-by-breath and mixing chamber systems.
    Beijst C; Schep G; Breda Ev; Wijn PF; Pul Cv
    J Med Eng Technol; 2013 Jan; 37(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 23110656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of COSMED'S FitMate™ and K4b2 metabolic systems reliability during graded cycling exercise.
    Brisswalter J; Tartaruga MP
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2014 Nov; 74(8):722-4. PubMed ID: 25375032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validation of a computerized metabolic measurement system (Oxycon-Pro) during low and high intensity exercise.
    Rietjens GJ; Kuipers H; Kester AD; Keizer HA
    Int J Sports Med; 2001 May; 22(4):291-4. PubMed ID: 11414673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reliability and validity of a portable metabolic measurement system.
    Melanson EL; Freedson PS; Hendelman D; Debold E
    Can J Appl Physiol; 1996 Apr; 21(2):109-19. PubMed ID: 8727474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validation of Aerosport KB1-C portable metabolic system.
    King GA; McLaughlin JE; Howley ET; Bassett DR; Ainsworth BE
    Int J Sports Med; 1999 Jul; 20(5):304-8. PubMed ID: 10452227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Comparative study of the pulmonary function equipment and Douglas-bag in the energy consumption measurement of Chinese healthy youth].
    Liu JM; Xu ZN; Li Y; Sun R; Tian Y; Li M; Piao JH; Yang XG
    Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2010 Sep; 44(9):795-9. PubMed ID: 21092622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of exercise modality on maximal and submaximal exercise parameters obtained by graded maximal exercise testing.
    Cornelis N; Buys R
    Int J Cardiol; 2016 Nov; 222():538-547. PubMed ID: 27513650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of respiratory gas variables, substrate, and energy use from 15 CPET systems during simulated and human exercise.
    Van Hooren B; Souren T; Bongers BC
    Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2024 Jan; 34(1):e14490. PubMed ID: 37697640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validity of the VmaxST portable metabolic measurement system.
    Laurent CM; Meyers MC; Robinson CA; Strong LR; Chase C; Goodwin B
    J Sports Sci; 2008 May; 26(7):709-16. PubMed ID: 18409102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation of the portable VmaxST system for oxygen-uptake measurement.
    Brehm MA; Harlaar J; Groepenhof H
    Gait Posture; 2004 Aug; 20(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 15196523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validity and stability of a computerized metabolic system with mixing chamber.
    Foss Ø; Hallén J
    Int J Sports Med; 2005 Sep; 26(7):569-75. PubMed ID: 16195991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Heart rate and metabolic responses to moderate-intensity aerobic exercise: a comparison of graded walking and ungraded jogging at a constant perceived exertion.
    Kilpatrick MW; Kraemer RR; Quigley EJ; Mears JL; Powers JM; Dedea AJ; Ferrer NF
    J Sports Sci; 2009 Mar; 27(5):509-16. PubMed ID: 19204846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prognostic value of a new cardiopulmonary exercise testing parameter in chronic heart failure: oxygen uptake efficiency at peak exercise - comparison with oxygen uptake efficiency slope.
    Toste A; Soares R; Feliciano J; Andreozzi V; Silva S; Abreu A; Ramos R; Santos N; Ferreira L; Ferreira RC
    Rev Port Cardiol; 2011 Oct; 30(10):781-7. PubMed ID: 22118129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Utility of a Non-Exercise VO2max Prediction Model for Designing Ramp Test Protocols.
    Cunha FA; Midgley A; Montenegro R; Vasconcellos F; Farinatti P
    Int J Sports Med; 2015 Oct; 36(10):796-802. PubMed ID: 26038880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validity and reliability of three commercially available breath-by-breath respiratory systems.
    Carter J; Jeukendrup AE
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2002 Mar; 86(5):435-41. PubMed ID: 11882930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validation of the sensormedics (S2900Z) metabolic cart for pediatric exercise testing.
    Unnithan VB; Wilson J; Buchanan D; Timmons JA; Paton JY
    Can J Appl Physiol; 1994 Dec; 19(4):472-9. PubMed ID: 7849663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.