These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23541307)
1. The importance of laboratory water quality for studying initial bacterial adhesion during NF filtration processes. Semião AJ; Habimana O; Cao H; Heffernan R; Safari A; Casey E Water Res; 2013 May; 47(8):2909-20. PubMed ID: 23541307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bacterial adhesion onto nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes: effect of permeate flux. Semião AJ; Habimana O; Casey E Water Res; 2014 Oct; 63():296-305. PubMed ID: 25016321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes by dairy industry effluents. Turan M; Ates A; Inanc B Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(12):355-60. PubMed ID: 12201123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Characterization and effect of biofouling on polyamide reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membrane surfaces. Khan MM; Stewart PS; Moll DJ; Mickols WE; Nelson SE; Camper AK Biofouling; 2011 Feb; 27(2):173-83. PubMed ID: 21253926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A physical impact of organic fouling layers on bacterial adhesion during nanofiltration. Heffernan R; Habimana O; Semião AJ; Cao H; Safari A; Casey E Water Res; 2014 Dec; 67():118-28. PubMed ID: 25265304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of fouling resistant nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes for dyeing wastewater effluent treatment. Myung SW; Choi IH; Lee SH; Kim IC; Lee KH Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):159-64. PubMed ID: 16003974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Direct observation of bacterial deposition onto clean and organic-fouled polyamide membranes. Subramani A; Huang X; Hoek EM J Colloid Interface Sci; 2009 Aug; 336(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 19406423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fouling characteristics of NF and RO operated for removal of dissolved matter from groundwater. Gwon EM; Yu MJ; Oh HK; Ylee YH Water Res; 2003 Jul; 37(12):2989-97. PubMed ID: 12767302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Combined coagulation-disk filtration process as a pretreatment of ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis membrane for wastewater reclamation: an autopsy study of a pilot plant. Chon K; Kim SJ; Moon J; Cho J Water Res; 2012 Apr; 46(6):1803-16. PubMed ID: 22310806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of residual organic macromolecules produced in biological wastewater treatment processes on removal of pharmaceuticals by NF/RO membranes. Kimura K; Iwase T; Kita S; Watanabe Y Water Res; 2009 Aug; 43(15):3751-8. PubMed ID: 19564034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of membrane fouling for in-line filtration of oil sands process-affected water: the effects of pretreatment conditions. Kim ES; Liu Y; Gamal El-Din M Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Mar; 46(5):2877-84. PubMed ID: 22279959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Upon impact: the fate of adhering Pseudomonas fluorescens cells during nanofiltration. Habimana O; Semião AJ; Casey E Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Aug; 48(16):9641-50. PubMed ID: 25072514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In-situ biofilm characterization in membrane systems using Optical Coherence Tomography: formation, structure, detachment and impact of flux change. Dreszer C; Wexler AD; Drusová S; Overdijk T; Zwijnenburg A; Flemming HC; Kruithof JC; Vrouwenvelder JS Water Res; 2014 Dec; 67():243-54. PubMed ID: 25282092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Antibiofilm activity of Bacillus pumilus SW9 against initial biofouling on microfiltration membranes. Zhang Y; Yu X; Gong S; Ye C; Fan Z; Lin H Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2014 Feb; 98(3):1309-20. PubMed ID: 23715854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Feasibility of supercritical CO₂ treatment for controlling biofouling in the reverse osmosis process. Mun S; Baek Y; Kim C; Lee YW; Yoon J Biofouling; 2012; 28(6):627-33. PubMed ID: 22726211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Gravity-driven membrane filtration as pretreatment for seawater reverse osmosis: linking biofouling layer morphology with flux stabilization. Akhondi E; Wu B; Sun S; Marxer B; Lim W; Gu J; Liu L; Burkhardt M; McDougald D; Pronk W; Fane AG Water Res; 2015 Mar; 70():158-73. PubMed ID: 25528546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of organic nutrient load on biomass accumulation, feed channel pressure drop increase and permeate flux decline in membrane systems. Bucs SS; Valladares Linares R; van Loosdrecht MC; Kruithof JC; Vrouwenvelder JS Water Res; 2014 Dec; 67():227-42. PubMed ID: 25282091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of membrane surface properties on the behavior of initial bacterial adhesion and biofilm development onto nanofiltration membranes. Myint AA; Lee W; Mun S; Ahn CH; Lee S; Yoon J Biofouling; 2010; 26(3):313-21. PubMed ID: 20087803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The influence of antiscalants on biofouling of RO membranes in seawater desalination. Sweity A; Oren Y; Ronen Z; Herzberg M Water Res; 2013 Jun; 47(10):3389-98. PubMed ID: 23615335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Role of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) in biofouling of reverse osmosis membranes. Herzberg M; Kang S; Elimelech M Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Jun; 43(12):4393-8. PubMed ID: 19603652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]