298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23541396)
1. Equilibrium population dynamics when mating is by mutual choice based on age.
Alpern S; Katrantzi I; Ramsey D
Theor Popul Biol; 2014 Jun; 94():63-72. PubMed ID: 23541396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Strategic mating with common preferences.
Alpern S; Reyniers D
J Theor Biol; 2005 Dec; 237(4):337-54. PubMed ID: 16171826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Strategic mating with homotypic preferences.
Alpern S; Reyniers D
J Theor Biol; 1999 May; 198(1):71-88. PubMed ID: 10329116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Why is mutual mate choice not the norm? Operational sex ratios, sex roles and the evolution of sexually dimorphic and monomorphic signalling.
Kokko H; Johnstone RA
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2002 Mar; 357(1419):319-30. PubMed ID: 11958700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sex differences, sex ratios and sex roles.
Owens IP; Thompson DB
Proc Biol Sci; 1994 Nov; 258(1352):93-9. PubMed ID: 7838858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. More than just a pretty face and a hot body: multiple cues in mate-choice.
Jonason PK; Raulston T; Rotolo A
J Soc Psychol; 2012; 152(2):174-84. PubMed ID: 22468419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sex roles and mutual mate choice matter during mate sampling.
Myhre LC; de Jong K; Forsgren E; Amundsen T
Am Nat; 2012 Jun; 179(6):741-55. PubMed ID: 22617262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Population genetic models of male and mutual mate choice.
Servedio MR; Lande R
Evolution; 2006 Apr; 60(4):674-85. PubMed ID: 16739450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sex differences in human mate preferences vary across sex ratios.
Walter KV; Conroy-Beam D; Buss DM; Asao K; Sorokowska A; Sorokowski P; Aavik T; Akello G; Alhabahba MM; Alm C; Amjad N; Anjum A; Atama CS; Duyar DA; Ayebare R; Batres C; Bendixen M; Bensafia A; Bizumic B; Boussena M; Butovskaya M; Can S; Cantarero K; Carrier A; Cetinkaya H; Croy I; Cueto RM; Czub M; Dronova D; Dural S; Duyar I; Ertugrul B; Espinosa A; Estevan I; Esteves CS; Fang L; Frackowiak T; Garduño JC; González KU; Guemaz F; Gyuris P; Halamová M; Herak I; Horvat M; Hromatko I; Hui CM; Jaafar JL; Jiang F; Kafetsios K; Kavčič T; Ottesen Kennair LE; Kervyn N; Khanh Ha TT; Khilji IA; Köbis NC; Lan HM; Láng A; Lennard GR; León E; Lindholm T; Linh TT; Lopez G; Luot NV; Mailhos A; Manesi Z; Martinez R; McKerchar SL; Meskó N; Misra G; Monaghan C; Mora EC; Moya-Garófano A; Musil B; Natividade JC; Niemczyk A; Nizharadze G; Oberzaucher E; Oleszkiewicz A; Omar-Fauzee MS; Onyishi IE; Özener B; Pagani AF; Pakalniskiene V; Parise M; Pazhoohi F; Pisanski A; Pisanski K; Ponciano E; Popa C; Prokop P; Rizwan M; Sainz M; Salkičević S; Sargautyte R; Sarmány-Schuller I; Schmehl S; Sharad S; Siddiqui RS; Simonetti F; Stoyanova SY; Tadinac M; Correa Varella MA; Vauclair CM; Vega LD; Widarini DA; Yoo G; Zaťková MM; Zupančič M
Proc Biol Sci; 2021 Jul; 288(1955):20211115. PubMed ID: 34284630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Trial marriage model-Female mate choice under male interference.
Li MY; Geng ZS; Liao P; Wang XY; Yang TC; Wang JY; Wang DD; Gao LF; Du B
J Anim Ecol; 2020 Aug; 89(8):1851-1859. PubMed ID: 32329064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Emergent patterns of mate choice in human populations.
Simão J; Todd PM
Artif Life; 2003; 9(4):403-17. PubMed ID: 14761259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mate choice and human stature: homogamy as a unified framework for understanding mating preferences.
Courtiol A; Raymond M; Godelle B; Ferdy JB
Evolution; 2010 Aug; 64(8):2189-203. PubMed ID: 20199563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences.
Jennions MD; Petrie M
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 1997 May; 72(2):283-327. PubMed ID: 9155244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. You can't always get what you want: size assortative mating by mutual mate choice as a resolution of sexual conflict.
Baldauf SA; Kullmann H; Schroth SH; Thünken T; Bakker TC
BMC Evol Biol; 2009 Jun; 9():129. PubMed ID: 19515244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Evolution of Mutual Mate Choice under Direct Benefits.
Courtiol A; Etienne L; Feron R; Godelle B; Rousset F
Am Nat; 2016 Nov; 188(5):521-538. PubMed ID: 27788341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Male mating constraints affect mutual mate choice: prudent male courting and sperm-limited females.
Härdling R; Gosden T; Aguilée R
Am Nat; 2008 Aug; 172(2):259-71. PubMed ID: 18588428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Male versus female mate choice: sexual selection and the evolution of species recognition via reinforcement.
Servedio MR
Evolution; 2007 Dec; 61(12):2772-89. PubMed ID: 17924955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Non-random mating and information theory.
Carvajal-Rodríguez A
Theor Popul Biol; 2018 Mar; 120():103-113. PubMed ID: 29391186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Adaptive mating strategies and the problem of mate retention.
Husárová B
Anthropol Anz; 2005 Sep; 63(3):283-7. PubMed ID: 16176054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. PERSPECTIVE: INDIRECT MATE CHOICE, COMPETITION FOR MATES, AND COEVOLUTION OF THE SEXES.
Wiley RH; Poston J
Evolution; 1996 Aug; 50(4):1371-1381. PubMed ID: 28565703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
