151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23541772)
1. Exploratory factor analysis with small sample sizes: a comparison of three approaches.
Jung S
Behav Processes; 2013 Jul; 97():90-5. PubMed ID: 23541772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Exploratory factor analysis for small samples.
Jung S; Lee S
Behav Res Methods; 2011 Sep; 43(3):701-9. PubMed ID: 21431996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Regularized Exploratory Bifactor Analysis With Small Sample Sizes.
Jung S; Seo DG; Park J
Front Psychol; 2020; 11():507. PubMed ID: 32372995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Recovery of weak factor loadings in confirmatory factor analysis under conditions of model misspecification.
Ximénez C
Behav Res Methods; 2009 Nov; 41(4):1038-52. PubMed ID: 19897812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Exploratory Factor Analysis With Small Samples and Missing Data.
McNeish D
J Pers Assess; 2017; 99(6):637-652. PubMed ID: 27929657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The performance of robust test statistics with categorical data.
Savalei V; Rhemtulla M
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 May; 66(2):201-23. PubMed ID: 22568535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of recent methods for the analysis of small-sample cross-over studies.
Chen X; Wei L
Stat Med; 2003 Sep; 22(18):2821-33. PubMed ID: 12953282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fuzzy least squares for identification of individual pharmacokinetic parameters.
Seng KY; Nestorov I; Vicini P
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 Dec; 56(12):2796-805. PubMed ID: 19695981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions.
Rhemtulla M; Brosseau-Liard PÉ; Savalei V
Psychol Methods; 2012 Sep; 17(3):354-73. PubMed ID: 22799625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Simple robust method for quasi-confirmatory factor analysis (three examples).
Sindik J
Coll Antropol; 2013 Dec; 37(4):1071-80. PubMed ID: 24611317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Monte Carlo study comparing PIV, ULS and DWLS in the estimation of dichotomous confirmatory factor analysis.
Nestler S
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 Feb; 66(1):127-43. PubMed ID: 22524532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Determining the number of factors to retain in an exploratory factor analysis using comparison data of known factorial structure.
Ruscio J; Roche B
Psychol Assess; 2012 Jun; 24(2):282-92. PubMed ID: 21966933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment and statistical modeling of the relationship between remotely sensed aerosol optical depth and PM2.5 in the eastern United States.
Paciorek CJ; Liu Y;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 May; (167):5-83; discussion 85-91. PubMed ID: 22838153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Model Implied Instrumental Variable Approach to Exploratory Factor Analysis (MIIV-EFA).
Bollen KA; Gates KM; Luo L
Psychometrika; 2024 Jun; 89(2):687-716. PubMed ID: 38532229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluating heterogeneity in indoor and outdoor air pollution using land-use regression and constrained factor analysis.
Levy JI; Clougherty JE; Baxter LK; Houseman EA; Paciorek CJ;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2010 Dec; (152):5-80; discussion 81-91. PubMed ID: 21409949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Exploratory factor analysis in behavior genetics research: factor recovery with small sample sizes.
Preacher KJ; MacCallum RC
Behav Genet; 2002 Mar; 32(2):153-61. PubMed ID: 12036113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Comparison of Regularized Maximum-Likelihood, Regularized 2-Stage Least Squares, and Maximum-Likelihood Estimation with Misspecified Models, Small Samples, and Weak Factor Structure.
Finch WH; Miller JE
Multivariate Behav Res; 2021; 56(4):608-626. PubMed ID: 32324059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Heywood you go away! Examining causes, effects, and treatments for Heywood cases in exploratory factor analysis.
Cooperman AW; Waller NG
Psychol Methods; 2022 Apr; 27(2):156-176. PubMed ID: 34197140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A simple approach to power and sample size calculations in logistic regression and Cox regression models.
Vaeth M; Skovlund E
Stat Med; 2004 Jun; 23(11):1781-92. PubMed ID: 15160408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A regularized kernel CCA contrast function for ICA.
Alzate C; Suykens JA
Neural Netw; 2008; 21(2-3):170-81. PubMed ID: 18280110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
