These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23542810)

  • 1. Looking at the world with your ears: how do we get the size of an object from its sound?
    Grassi M; Pastore M; Lemaitre G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 May; 143(1):96-104. PubMed ID: 23542810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do we hear size or sound? Balls dropped on plates.
    Grassi M
    Percept Psychophys; 2005 Feb; 67(2):274-84. PubMed ID: 15971691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. High-intensity sound increases the size of visually perceived objects.
    Takeshima Y; Gyoba J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Apr; 75(3):501-7. PubMed ID: 23188734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predicting the timing of dynamic events through sound: Bouncing balls.
    Gygi B; Giordano BL; Shafiro V; Kharkhurin A; Zhang PX
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jul; 138(1):457-66. PubMed ID: 26233044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Low is large: spatial location and pitch interact in voice-based body size estimation.
    Pisanski K; Isenstein SGE; Montano KJ; O'Connor JJM; Feinberg DR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 May; 79(4):1239-1251. PubMed ID: 28229428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing auditory distance perception using virtual acoustics.
    Zahorik P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Apr; 111(4):1832-46. PubMed ID: 12002867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Experience with a second language affects the use of fundamental frequency in speech segmentation.
    Tremblay A; Namjoshi J; Spinelli E; Broersma M; Cho T; Kim S; Martínez-García MT; Connell K
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0181709. PubMed ID: 28738093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Promoting the perception of two and three concurrent sound objects: An event-related potential study.
    Kocsis Z; Winkler I; Bendixen A; Alain C
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2016 Sep; 107():16-28. PubMed ID: 27374254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The psychomechanics of simulated sound sources: material properties of impacted thin plates.
    McAdams S; Roussarie V; Chaigne A; Giordano BL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1401-13. PubMed ID: 20815474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceptual constancy in auditory perception of distance to railway tracks.
    De Coensel B; Nilsson ME; Berglund B; Brown AL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jul; 134(1):474-80. PubMed ID: 23862822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. ARTSTREAM: a neural network model of auditory scene analysis and source segregation.
    Grossberg S; Govindarajan KK; Wyse LL; Cohen MA
    Neural Netw; 2004 May; 17(4):511-36. PubMed ID: 15109681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evidence for enhanced discrimination of virtual auditory distance among blind listeners using level and direct-to-reverberant cues.
    Kolarik AJ; Cirstea S; Pardhan S
    Exp Brain Res; 2013 Feb; 224(4):623-33. PubMed ID: 23178908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of frequency disparities on trading of an ambiguous tone between two competing auditory objects.
    Lee AK; Shinn-Cunningham BG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jun; 123(6):4340-51. PubMed ID: 18537385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What the precedence effect tells us about room acoustics.
    Clifton RK; Freyman RL; Meo J
    Percept Psychophys; 2002 Feb; 64(2):180-8. PubMed ID: 12013373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Integration of acoustical information in the perception of impacted sound sources: the role of information accuracy and exploitability.
    Giordano BL; Rocchesso D; McAdams S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Apr; 36(2):462-76. PubMed ID: 20364930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evidence for cue-independent spatial representation in the human auditory cortex during active listening.
    Higgins NC; McLaughlin SA; Rinne T; Stecker GC
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Sep; 114(36):E7602-E7611. PubMed ID: 28827357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Attentive Tracking of Sound Sources.
    Woods KJ; McDermott JH
    Curr Biol; 2015 Aug; 25(17):2238-46. PubMed ID: 26279234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of aging and interaural delay on the detection of a break in the interaural correlation between two sounds.
    Li L; Huang J; Wu X; Qi JG; Schneider BA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):273-86. PubMed ID: 19194287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Judging sound rotation when listeners and sounds rotate: Sound source localization is a multisystem process.
    Yost WA; Zhong X; Najam A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Nov; 138(5):3293-310. PubMed ID: 26627802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does Loudness Relate to the Strength of the Sound Produced by the Source or Received by the Ears? A Review of How Focus Affects Loudness.
    Berthomieu G; Koehl V; Paquier M
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():583690. PubMed ID: 33633631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.