These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23543236)
1. Lower energy to make a corneal flap with a 60 kHz femtosecond laser reduces flap inflammation and corneal stromal cell death but weakens flap adhesion. Kim JY; Joo SW; Sunwoo JH; Kim ES; Kim MJ; Tchah H Korean J Ophthalmol; 2013 Apr; 27(2):120-5. PubMed ID: 23543236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of femtosecond laser energy level on corneal stromal cell death and inflammation. de Medeiros FW; Kaur H; Agrawal V; Chaurasia SS; Hammel J; Dupps WJ; Wilson SE J Refract Surg; 2009 Oct; 25(10):869-74. PubMed ID: 19835327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A femtosecond laser creates a stronger flap than a mechanical microkeratome. Kim JY; Kim MJ; Kim TI; Choi HJ; Pak JH; Tchah H Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Feb; 47(2):599-604. PubMed ID: 16431956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Femtosecond laser and microkeratome corneal flaps: comparison of stromal wound healing and inflammation. Netto MV; Mohan RR; Medeiros FW; Dupps WJ; Sinha S; Krueger RR; Stapleton WM; Rayborn M; Suto C; Wilson SE J Refract Surg; 2007 Sep; 23(7):667-76. PubMed ID: 17912936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of flap adhesion strength using the Amadeus microkeratome and the IntraLase iFS femtosecond laser in rabbits. Knorz MC; Vossmerbaeumer U J Refract Surg; 2008 Nov; 24(9):875-8. PubMed ID: 19044226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative study of nJ- and μJ-energy level femtosecond lasers: evaluation of flap adhesion strength, stromal bed quality, and tissue responses. Riau AK; Liu YC; Lwin NC; Ang HP; Tan NY; Yam GH; Tan DT; Mehta JS Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Apr; 55(5):3186-94. PubMed ID: 24764066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Corneal response to femtosecond laser photodisruption in the rabbit. Morishige N; Kesler-Diaz A; Wahlert AJ; Kurtz RM; Juhasz T; Sarayba M; Jester JV Exp Eye Res; 2008 May; 86(5):835-43. PubMed ID: 18395714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cellular effects after laser in situ keratomileusis flap formation with femtosecond lasers: a review. Santhiago MR; Wilson SE Cornea; 2012 Feb; 31(2):198-205. PubMed ID: 22157568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the femtosecond laser (IntraLase) versus manual microkeratome (Moria ALTK) in dissection of the donor in endothelial keratoplasty: initial study in eye bank eyes. Jones YJ; Goins KM; Sutphin JE; Mullins R; Skeie JM Cornea; 2008 Jan; 27(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 18245973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Opaque bubble layer incidence in Femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK: comparison among different flap design parameters. Mastropasqua L; Calienno R; Lanzini M; Salgari N; De Vecchi S; Mastropasqua R; Nubile M Int Ophthalmol; 2017 Jun; 37(3):635-641. PubMed ID: 27518898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]