These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23543248)

  • 1. Early and parallel processing of pragmatic and semantic information in speech acts: neurophysiological evidence.
    Egorova N; Shtyrov Y; Pulvermüller F
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2013; 7():86. PubMed ID: 23543248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Neurophysiological evidence for rapid processing of verbal and gestural information in understanding communicative actions.
    Tomasello R; Kim C; Dreyer FR; Grisoni L; Pulvermüller F
    Sci Rep; 2019 Nov; 9(1):16285. PubMed ID: 31705052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Neural dynamics of speech act comprehension: an MEG study of naming and requesting.
    Egorova N; Pulvermüller F; Shtyrov Y
    Brain Topogr; 2014 May; 27(3):375-92. PubMed ID: 24253730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Brain basis of communicative actions in language.
    Egorova N; Shtyrov Y; Pulvermüller F
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jan; 125():857-867. PubMed ID: 26505303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Brain signatures predict communicative function of speech production in interaction.
    Boux I; Tomasello R; Grisoni L; Pulvermüller F
    Cortex; 2021 Feb; 135():127-145. PubMed ID: 33360757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Instantaneous neural processing of communicative functions conveyed by speech prosody.
    Tomasello R; Grisoni L; Boux I; Sammler D; Pulvermüller F
    Cereb Cortex; 2022 Oct; 32(21):4885-4901. PubMed ID: 35136980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Linguistic signs in action: The neuropragmatics of speech acts.
    Tomasello R
    Brain Lang; 2023 Jan; 236():105203. PubMed ID: 36470125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of brain mechanisms underlying the processing of Chinese characters and pseudo-characters: an event-related potential study.
    Wang T; Li H; Zhang Q; Tu S; Yu C; Qiu J
    Int J Psychol; 2010 Apr; 45(2):102-10. PubMed ID: 22043890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The time course of visual word recognition as revealed by linear regression analysis of ERP data.
    Hauk O; Davis MH; Ford M; Pulvermüller F; Marslen-Wilson WD
    Neuroimage; 2006 May; 30(4):1383-400. PubMed ID: 16460964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spatio-temporal Dynamics of Referential and Inferential Naming: Different Brain and Cognitive Operations to Lexical Selection.
    Fargier R; Laganaro M
    Brain Topogr; 2017 Mar; 30(2):182-197. PubMed ID: 27334987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does dynamic information about the speaker's face contribute to semantic speech processing? ERP evidence.
    Hernández-Gutiérrez D; Abdel Rahman R; Martín-Loeches M; Muñoz F; Schacht A; Sommer W
    Cortex; 2018 Jul; 104():12-25. PubMed ID: 29715582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pragmatics in action: indirect requests engage theory of mind areas and the cortical motor network.
    van Ackeren MJ; Casasanto D; Bekkering H; Hagoort P; Rueschemeyer SA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Nov; 24(11):2237-47. PubMed ID: 22849399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Differential Phonological and Semantic Modulation of Neurophysiological Responses to Visual Word Recognition.
    Drakesmith M; El-Deredy W; Welbourne S
    Neuropsychobiology; 2015; 72(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 26337735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. First-pass neocortical processing of spoken language takes only 30 msec: Electrophysiological evidence.
    Shtyrov Y; Lenzen M
    Cogn Neurosci; 2017 Jan; 8(1):24-38. PubMed ID: 26919206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Some neurophysiological constraints on models of word naming.
    Binder JR; Medler DA; Desai R; Conant LL; Liebenthal E
    Neuroimage; 2005 Sep; 27(3):677-93. PubMed ID: 15921937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Can I have a quick word? Early electrophysiological manifestations of psycholinguistic processes revealed by event-related regression analysis of the EEG.
    Hauk O; Pulvermüller F; Ford M; Marslen-Wilson WD; Davis MH
    Biol Psychol; 2009 Jan; 80(1):64-74. PubMed ID: 18565639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. ERP evidence of distinct processes underlying semantic facilitation and interference in word production.
    Python G; Fargier R; Laganaro M
    Cortex; 2018 Feb; 99():1-12. PubMed ID: 29121484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Early semantic context integration and lexical access as revealed by event-related brain potentials.
    Penolazzi B; Hauk O; Pulvermüller F
    Biol Psychol; 2007 Mar; 74(3):374-88. PubMed ID: 17150298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Electrophysiological differentiation of phonological and semantic integration in word and sentence contexts.
    Diaz MT; Swaab TY
    Brain Res; 2007 May; 1146():85-100. PubMed ID: 16952338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dynamics of phonological-phonetic encoding in word production: evidence from diverging ERPs between stroke patients and controls.
    Laganaro M; Python G; Toepel U
    Brain Lang; 2013 Aug; 126(2):123-32. PubMed ID: 23707932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.