BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23543462)

  • 1. An evaluation of two conducted electrical weapons and two probe designs using a swine comparative cardiac safety model.
    Dawes DM; Ho JD; Moore JC; Miner JR
    Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2013 Sep; 9(3):333-42. PubMed ID: 23543462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An evaluation of two conducted electrical weapons using a swine comparative cardiac safety model.
    Dawes DM; Ho JD; Moore JC; Laudenbach AP; Reardon RF; Miner JR
    Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2014 Sep; 10(3):329-35. PubMed ID: 24895072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electrical safety of conducted electrical weapons relative to requirements of relevant electrical standards.
    Panescu D; Nerheim M; Kroll M
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():5342-7. PubMed ID: 24110943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. New conducted electrical weapons: Finite element modeling of safety margins.
    Panescu D; Kroll MW; Brave MA
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2017 Jul; 2017():2170-2176. PubMed ID: 29060327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. New conducted electrical weapons: Electrical safety relative to relevant standards.
    Panescu D; Nerheim M; Kroll MW; Brave MA
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2017 Jul; 2017():2185-2190. PubMed ID: 29060330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of three conducted electrical weapons in a surrogate swine cardiac safety model.
    Dawes DM; Ho JD; Halperin HR; Fink SJ; Driver BE; Klein LR
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2021 Jan; 77():102088. PubMed ID: 33242742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Blood lactate concentration after exposure to conducted energy weapons (including TASER® devices): is it clinically relevant?
    Jauchem JR
    Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2013 Sep; 9(3):386-94. PubMed ID: 23605975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of a TASER® conducted energy weapon on the circulating red-blood-cell population and other factors in Sus scrofa.
    Jauchem JR; Bernhard JA; Cerna CZ; Lim TY; Seaman RL; Tarango M
    Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2013 Sep; 9(3):308-20. PubMed ID: 23543463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. TASER® conducted electrical weapons: misconceptions in the scientific/medical and other literature.
    Jauchem JR
    Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2015 Mar; 11(1):53-64. PubMed ID: 25549958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. TASER CEW distance determination for models X26P, X2, and TASER 7.
    Zhou YR; Liscio E; Ruffo HE; Doucette CM; Cao W
    Forensic Sci Int; 2023 Jan; 342():111520. PubMed ID: 36462472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Transcardiac conducted electrical weapon (TASER) probe deployments: incidence and outcomes.
    Bozeman WP; Teacher E; Winslow JE
    J Emerg Med; 2012 Dec; 43(6):970-5. PubMed ID: 22674039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The topical problems of the application of the TASER electroshock devices].
    Kondratova IV; Kulinkovich KY
    Sud Med Ekspert; 2017; 60(2):57-64. PubMed ID: 28399089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Medical safety of TASER conducted energy weapon in a hybrid 3-point deployment mode.
    Panescu D; Kroll MW; Stratbucker RA
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():3191-4. PubMed ID: 19964800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cardiac effects of varying pulse charge and polarity of TASER conducted electrical weapons.
    Kroll MW; Panescu D; Carver M; Kroll RM; Hinz AF
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():3195-8. PubMed ID: 19964054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparative study of conducted electrical weapon incapacitation during a goal-directed task.
    Ho J; Dawes DM; Kunz SN; Satpathy R; Klein L; Driver B; Stang JL
    Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2020 Dec; 16(4):613-621. PubMed ID: 32812174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. 40-Hz square-wave stimulation requires less energy to produce muscle contraction: compared with the TASER® X26 conducted energy weapon.
    Comeaux JA; Jauchem JR; Cox DD; Crane CC; D'Andrea JA
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 Jul; 58(4):1026-31. PubMed ID: 23682682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validity of the small swine model for human electrical safety risks.
    Brave MA; Lakkireddy DR; Kroll MW; Panescu D
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2016 Aug; 2016():2343-2348. PubMed ID: 28268796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparative brief on conducted electrical weapon safety.
    Kunz SN; Adamec J
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 2019 May; 169(7-8):185-192. PubMed ID: 29392503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Physiological effects of the TASER C2 conducted energy weapon.
    Jauchem JR; Seaman RL; Klages CM
    Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2009; 5(3):189-98. PubMed ID: 19598011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Immediate cardiovascular effects of the Taser X26 conducted electrical weapon.
    Bozeman WP; Barnes DG; Winslow JE; Johnson JC; Phillips CH; Alson R
    Emerg Med J; 2009 Aug; 26(8):567-70. PubMed ID: 19625551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.