229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23543463)
1. Effects of a TASER® conducted energy weapon on the circulating red-blood-cell population and other factors in Sus scrofa.
Jauchem JR; Bernhard JA; Cerna CZ; Lim TY; Seaman RL; Tarango M
Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2013 Sep; 9(3):308-20. PubMed ID: 23543463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Blood lactate concentration after exposure to conducted energy weapons (including TASER® devices): is it clinically relevant?
Jauchem JR
Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2013 Sep; 9(3):386-94. PubMed ID: 23605975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Physiological effects of the TASER C2 conducted energy weapon.
Jauchem JR; Seaman RL; Klages CM
Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2009; 5(3):189-98. PubMed ID: 19598011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Exposures of Sus scrofa to a TASER(®) conducted electrical weapon: no effects on 2-dimensional gel electrophoresis patterns of plasma proteins.
Jauchem JR; Cerna CZ; Lim TY; Seaman RL
Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2014 Dec; 10(4):526-34. PubMed ID: 25319243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Increased hematocrit after applications of conducted energy weapons (including TASER(®) devices) to Sus scrofa.
Jauchem JR
J Forensic Sci; 2011 Jan; 56 Suppl 1():S229-33. PubMed ID: 21198623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Increased Hematocrit Due to Electrical-Waveform Exposures in Splenectomized Sus scrofa.
Jauchem JR; Burns JM; Voorhees WB; Jirjis MB
J Forensic Sci; 2019 Jul; 64(4):1196-1202. PubMed ID: 30508303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An evaluation of two conducted electrical weapons and two probe designs using a swine comparative cardiac safety model.
Dawes DM; Ho JD; Moore JC; Miner JR
Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2013 Sep; 9(3):333-42. PubMed ID: 23543462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. TASER® conducted electrical weapons: misconceptions in the scientific/medical and other literature.
Jauchem JR
Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2015 Mar; 11(1):53-64. PubMed ID: 25549958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. 40-Hz square-wave stimulation requires less energy to produce muscle contraction: compared with the TASER® X26 conducted energy weapon.
Comeaux JA; Jauchem JR; Cox DD; Crane CC; D'Andrea JA
J Forensic Sci; 2013 Jul; 58(4):1026-31. PubMed ID: 23682682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Exposures to conducted electrical weapons (including TASER® devices): how many and for how long are acceptable?
Jauchem JR
J Forensic Sci; 2015 Jan; 60 Suppl 1():S116-29. PubMed ID: 25443856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Medical safety of TASER conducted energy weapon in a hybrid 3-point deployment mode.
Panescu D; Kroll MW; Stratbucker RA
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():3191-4. PubMed ID: 19964800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. New conducted electrical weapons: Finite element modeling of safety margins.
Panescu D; Kroll MW; Brave MA
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2017 Jul; 2017():2170-2176. PubMed ID: 29060327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Acidosis, lactate, electrolytes, muscle enzymes, and other factors in the blood of Sus scrofa following repeated TASER exposures.
Jauchem JR; Sherry CJ; Fines DA; Cook MC
Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Aug; 161(1):20-30. PubMed ID: 16289999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An animal model to investigate effectiveness and safety of conducted energy weapons (including TASER devices).
Jauchem JR
J Forensic Sci; 2010 Mar; 55(2):521-6. PubMed ID: 20141556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. TASER CEW distance determination for models X26P, X2, and TASER 7.
Zhou YR; Liscio E; Ruffo HE; Doucette CM; Cao W
Forensic Sci Int; 2023 Jan; 342():111520. PubMed ID: 36462472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Transcardiac conducted electrical weapon (TASER) probe deployments: incidence and outcomes.
Bozeman WP; Teacher E; Winslow JE
J Emerg Med; 2012 Dec; 43(6):970-5. PubMed ID: 22674039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Blood factors of Sus scrofa following a series of three TASER electronic control device exposures.
Jauchem JR; Cook MC; Beason CW
Forensic Sci Int; 2008 Mar; 175(2-3):166-70. PubMed ID: 17630236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An evaluation of two conducted electrical weapons using a swine comparative cardiac safety model.
Dawes DM; Ho JD; Moore JC; Laudenbach AP; Reardon RF; Miner JR
Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2014 Sep; 10(3):329-35. PubMed ID: 24895072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Electrical safety of conducted electrical weapons relative to requirements of relevant electrical standards.
Panescu D; Nerheim M; Kroll M
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():5342-7. PubMed ID: 24110943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Survival of anesthetized Sus scrofa after cycling (7-second on/3-second off) exposures to an electronic control device for 3 minutes.
Jauchem JR; Seaman RL; Fines DA
Am J Forensic Med Pathol; 2011 Jun; 32(2):124-30. PubMed ID: 21464698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
