These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23543603)

  • 1. Sequential bioequivalence trial designs with increased power and controlled type I error rates.
    Fuglsang A
    AAPS J; 2013 Jul; 15(3):659-61. PubMed ID: 23543603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimal adaptive sequential designs for crossover bioequivalence studies.
    Xu J; Audet C; DiLiberti CE; Hauck WW; Montague TH; Parr AF; Potvin D; Schuirmann DJ
    Pharm Stat; 2016; 15(1):15-27. PubMed ID: 26538182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of the upper sample size limit in two-stage bioequivalence designs.
    Karalis V
    Int J Pharm; 2013 Nov; 456(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 23954235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Controlling the type I error rate in two-stage sequential adaptive designs when testing for average bioequivalence.
    Maurer W; Jones B; Chen Y
    Stat Med; 2018 May; 37(10):1587-1607. PubMed ID: 29462835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Controlling type 1 error rate for sequential, bioequivalence studies with crossover designs.
    Rasmussen HE; Ma R; Wang JJ
    Pharm Stat; 2019 Jan; 18(1):96-105. PubMed ID: 30370634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Blinded sample size re-estimation in crossover bioequivalence trials.
    Golkowski D; Friede T; Kieser M
    Pharm Stat; 2014; 13(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 24715672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sequential design approaches for bioequivalence studies with crossover designs.
    Potvin D; DiLiberti CE; Hauck WW; Parr AF; Schuirmann DJ; Smith RA
    Pharm Stat; 2008; 7(4):245-62. PubMed ID: 17710740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sequential bioequivalence approaches for parallel designs.
    Fuglsang A
    AAPS J; 2014 May; 16(3):373-8. PubMed ID: 24526610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Futility rules in bioequivalence trials with sequential designs.
    Fuglsang A
    AAPS J; 2014 Jan; 16(1):79-82. PubMed ID: 24218038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pilot and Repeat Trials as Development Tools Associated with Demonstration of Bioequivalence.
    Fuglsang A
    AAPS J; 2015 May; 17(3):678-83. PubMed ID: 25732246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An iterative method to protect the type I error rate in bioequivalence studies under two-stage adaptive 2×2 crossover designs.
    Molins E; Labes D; Schütz H; Cobo E; Ocaña J
    Biom J; 2021 Jan; 63(1):122-133. PubMed ID: 33000873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Two-stage designs in bioequivalence trials.
    Schütz H
    Eur J Clin Pharmacol; 2015 Mar; 71(3):271-81. PubMed ID: 25604509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Two-stage designs versus European scaled average designs in bioequivalence studies for highly variable drugs: Which to choose?
    Molins E; Cobo E; Ocaña J
    Stat Med; 2017 Dec; 36(30):4777-4788. PubMed ID: 28853164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Additional results for 'Sequential design approaches for bioequivalence studies with crossover designs'.
    Montague TH; Potvin D; Diliberti CE; Hauck WW; Parr AF; Schuirmann DJ
    Pharm Stat; 2012; 11(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 21308974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Design and inference for 3-stage bioequivalence testing with serial sampling data.
    Yan F; Zhu H; Liu J; Jiang L; Huang X
    Pharm Stat; 2018 Sep; 17(5):458-476. PubMed ID: 29726096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Two-stage designs for cross-over bioequivalence trials.
    Kieser M; Rauch G
    Stat Med; 2015 Jul; 34(16):2403-16. PubMed ID: 25809815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Carryover negligibility and relevance in bioequivalence studies.
    Ocaña J; Sanchez O MP; Carrasco JL
    Pharm Stat; 2015; 14(5):400-8. PubMed ID: 26175204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A sequential bioequivalence design with a potential ethical advantage.
    Fuglsang A
    AAPS J; 2014 Jul; 16(4):843-6. PubMed ID: 24871343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Power Analysis and Sample Size Determination for Crossover Trials with Application to Bioequivalence Assessment of Topical Ophthalmic Drugs Using Serial Sampling Pharmacokinetic Data.
    Yu YP; Yan XY; Yao C; Xia JL
    Biomed Environ Sci; 2019 Aug; 32(8):614-623. PubMed ID: 31488237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modifications of sequential designs in bioequivalence trials.
    Zheng C; Zhao L; Wang J
    Pharm Stat; 2015; 14(3):180-8. PubMed ID: 25663282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.