163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23543639)
1. A prospective randomized comparative study of vicryl rapide versus chromic catgut for episiotomy repair.
Bharathi A; Reddy DB; Kote GS
J Clin Diagn Res; 2013 Feb; 7(2):326-30. PubMed ID: 23543639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Ipswich Childbirth Study: 2. A randomised comparison of polyglactin 910 with chromic catgut for postpartum perineal repair.
Mackrodt C; Gordon B; Fern E; Ayers S; Truesdale A; Grant A
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1998 Apr; 105(4):441-5. PubMed ID: 9609273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical equivalence of Trusynth fast
Hemalatha Devi D; Bolanthakodi C; D'Cunha P; Bheema Bai M; Kumar Moharana A; Ts D
F1000Res; 2022; 11():1179. PubMed ID: 37388624
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A randomised trial, conducted by midwives, of perineal repairs comparing a polyglycolic suture material and chromic catgut.
Upton A; Roberts CL; Ryan M; Faulkner M; Reynolds M; Raynes-Greenow C
Midwifery; 2002 Sep; 18(3):223-9. PubMed ID: 12381426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Absorbable suture materials for primary repair of episiotomy and second degree tears.
Kettle C; Dowswell T; Ismail KM
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2010 Jun; 2010(6):CD000006. PubMed ID: 20556745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Randomized comparison of chromic versus fast-absorbing polyglactin 910 for postpartum perineal repair.
Greenberg JA; Lieberman E; Cohen AP; Ecker JL
Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jun; 103(6):1308-13. PubMed ID: 15172869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Absorbable synthetic versus catgut suture material for perineal repair.
Kettle C; Johanson RB
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2000; (2):CD000006. PubMed ID: 10796081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of chromic catgut versus polyglactin 910 versus fast-absorbing polyglactin 910 sutures for perineal repair: a randomized, controlled trial.
Leroux N; Bujold E
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Jun; 194(6):1585-90; discussion 1590. PubMed ID: 16731075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Postpartum perineal repair performed by midwives: a randomised trial comparing two suture techniques leaving the skin unsutured.
Kindberg S; Stehouwer M; Hvidman L; Henriksen TB
BJOG; 2008 Mar; 115(4):472-9. PubMed ID: 18271883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Episiotomy repair: chromic versus polyglycolic acid suture.
Ketcham KR; Pastorek JG; Letellier RL
South Med J; 1994 Apr; 87(4):514-7. PubMed ID: 8153782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [A comparison between chromic catgut and polyglycolic acid sutures in episiotomy repair (author's transl)].
Bänninger U; Bührig H; Schreiner WE
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1978 Jan; 38(1):30-3. PubMed ID: 342330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A randomized comparison of glycerol-impregnated chromic catgut with untreated chromic catgut for the repair of perineal trauma.
Spencer JA; Grant A; Elbourne D; Garcia J; Sleep J
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1986 May; 93(5):426-30. PubMed ID: 3518787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Secondary suturing compared to non-suturing for broken down perineal wounds following childbirth.
Dudley LM; Kettle C; Ismail KM
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Sep; (9):CD008977. PubMed ID: 24065561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Episiotomy repair: Vicryl versus Vicryl rapide.
McElhinney BR; Glenn DR; Dornan G; Harper MA
Ulster Med J; 2000 May; 69(1):27-9. PubMed ID: 10881642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The MOVE-trial: Monocryl® vs. Vicryl Rapide™ for skin repair in mediolateral episiotomies: a randomized controlled trial.
Odijk R; Hennipman B; Rousian M; Madani K; Dijksterhuis M; de Leeuw JW; van Hof A
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Oct; 17(1):355. PubMed ID: 29037181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Ipswich Childbirth Study: 1. A randomised evaluation of two stage postpartum perineal repair leaving the skin unsutured.
Gordon B; Mackrodt C; Fern E; Truesdale A; Ayers S; Grant A
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1998 Apr; 105(4):435-40. PubMed ID: 9609272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Ipswich childbirth study: one year follow up of alternative methods used in perineal repair.
Grant A; Gordon B; Mackrodat C; Fern E; Truesdale A; Ayers S
BJOG; 2001 Jan; 108(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 11213002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Continuous versus interrupted sutures for repair of episiotomy or second degree tears.
Kettle C; Hills RK; Ismail KM
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2007 Oct; (4):CD000947. PubMed ID: 17943747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Randomized, Single-Blind Study Comparing the Clinical Equivalence of Truglyde Fast® and Safil Quick® Polyglycolic Acid Fast-Absorbing Sutures for Episiotomy Repair Following Vaginal Delivery.
Nk R; Devgarha G; Subha Shree Rao YA; N R; Moharana AK; Ts D
Cureus; 2023 Jul; 15(7):e42348. PubMed ID: 37621806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Southmead perineal suture study. A randomized comparison of suture materials and suturing techniques for repair of perineal trauma.
Mahomed K; Grant A; Ashurst H; James D
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1989 Nov; 96(11):1272-80. PubMed ID: 2558705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
