These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23543803)

  • 1. 'Doctor, what would you do in my position?' Health professionals and the decision-making process in pregnancy monitoring.
    Hertig SG; Cavalli S; Burton-Jeangros C; Elger BS
    J Med Ethics; 2014 May; 40(5):310-4. PubMed ID: 23543803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ethical decision-making in prenatal diagnosis and termination of pregnancy: a qualitative survey among physicians and midwives.
    Garel M; Gosme-Seguret S; Kaminski M; Cuttini M
    Prenat Diagn; 2002 Sep; 22(9):811-7. PubMed ID: 12224077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The analysis of physicians' work: announcing the end of attempts at in vitro fertilization].
    Santiago-Delefosse M; Cahen F; Coeffin-Driol C
    Encephale; 2003; 29(4 Pt 1):293-305. PubMed ID: 14615699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Women's and health professionals' preferences for prenatal testing for Down syndrome in Australia.
    Lewis SM; Cullinane FM; Carlin JB; Halliday JL
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Jun; 46(3):205-11. PubMed ID: 16704474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Psychosocial Factors of Health Professionals' Intention to Use a Decision Aid for Down Syndrome Screening: Cross-Sectional Quantitative Study.
    Abbasgholizadeh Rahimi S; Lépine J; Croteau J; Robitaille H; Giguere AM; Wilson BJ; Rousseau F; Lévesque I; Légaré F
    J Med Internet Res; 2018 Apr; 20(4):e114. PubMed ID: 29695369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Obstetric professionals' perceptions of non-invasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome: clinical usefulness compared with existing tests and ethical implications.
    Ngan OMY; Yi H; Wong SYS; Sahota D; Ahmed S
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Sep; 17(1):285. PubMed ID: 28870159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attitudes and practices of patients and physicians towards patient autonomy: a survey conducted prior to the enactment of the Patients' Rights Bill in Israel.
    Sadan B; Chejk-Saul T
    Eubios J Asian Int Bioeth; 2000 Jul; 10(4):119-25. PubMed ID: 16273716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Norwegian obstetricians' experiences of the use of ultrasound in pregnancy management. A qualitative study.
    Edvardsson K; Åhman A; Fagerli TA; Darj E; Holmlund S; Small R; Mogren I
    Sex Reprod Healthc; 2018 Mar; 15():69-76. PubMed ID: 29389504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Patient-centered prenatal counseling: aligning obstetric healthcare professionals with needs of pregnant women.
    Farrell RM; Nutter B; Agatisa PK
    Women Health; 2015; 55(3):280-96. PubMed ID: 25794055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Ethical aspects of prenatal screening for Down's syndrome].
    Tóth A; Szabó J
    Orv Hetil; 2000 Oct; 141(42):2293-8. PubMed ID: 11076495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Uptake of a prenatal screening test: the role of healthcare professionals' attitudes towards the test.
    Dormandy E; Marteau TM
    Prenat Diagn; 2004 Nov; 24(11):864-8. PubMed ID: 15565654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The medical practice of patient autonomy and cancer treatment refusals: a patients' and physicians' perspective.
    van Kleffens T; van Baarsen B; van Leeuwen E
    Soc Sci Med; 2004 Jun; 58(11):2325-36. PubMed ID: 15047088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What factors influence health professionals to use decision aids for Down syndrome prenatal screening?
    Lépine J; Leiva Portocarrero ME; Delanoë A; Robitaille H; Lévesque I; Rousseau F; Wilson BJ; Giguère AM; Légaré F
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Sep; 16(1):262. PubMed ID: 27596573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Factors influencing repeat caesarean section: qualitative exploratory study of obstetricians' and midwives' accounts.
    Kamal P; Dixon-Woods M; Kurinczuk JJ; Oppenheimer C; Squire P; Waugh J
    BJOG; 2005 Aug; 112(8):1054-60. PubMed ID: 16045517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Missed expectations? Physicians' views of patients' participation in medical decision-making.
    McGuire AL; McCullough LB; Weller SC; Whitney SN
    Med Care; 2005 May; 43(5):466-70. PubMed ID: 15838411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Representing and intervening: 'doing' good care in first trimester prenatal knowledge production and decision-making.
    Schwennesen N; Koch L
    Sociol Health Illn; 2012 Feb; 34(2):283-98. PubMed ID: 22257243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Medical decision making: paternalism versus patient-centered (autonomous) care.
    Rodriguez-Osorio CA; Dominguez-Cherit G
    Curr Opin Crit Care; 2008 Dec; 14(6):708-13. PubMed ID: 19005314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The provision of information and informed decision-making on prenatal screening for Down syndrome: a questionnaire- and register-based survey in a non-selected population.
    Schoonen M; Wildschut H; Essink-Bot ML; Peters I; Steegers E; de Koning H
    Patient Educ Couns; 2012 Jun; 87(3):351-9. PubMed ID: 22030253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Obstetric decision-making and counseling at the limits of viability.
    Tucker Edmonds B; Krasny S; Srinivas S; Shea J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Mar; 206(3):248.e1-5. PubMed ID: 22381606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ethical issues in periviable birth.
    Chervenak FA; McCullough LB
    Semin Perinatol; 2013 Dec; 37(6):422-5. PubMed ID: 24290400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.