These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23544315)

  • 1. A new approach to sex-based classifications in the context of procreative rights: S.H. & Others V. Austria in context.
    Sanderson M
    Eur J Health Law; 2013 Mar; 20(1):21-40. PubMed ID: 23544315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Health, human rights and the regulation of reproductive technologies in S.H. And others V Austria (application no. 57813/00).
    McGuinness S
    Med Law Rev; 2013; 21(1):146-60. PubMed ID: 23420774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [On the Decision of the European Court of Human Rights. The S.H. and others against Austria. TEDH 2010/56 of April 1, on human assisted reproduction and its incidence on the European legislative arena].
    Vidal Martínez J
    Rev Derecho Genoma Hum; 2011; (34):155-201. PubMed ID: 22977960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The consequences of S.H. and Others v. Austria for legislation on gamete donation in Europe: an ethical analysis of the European Court of Human Rights judgments.
    Van Hoof W; Pennings G
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2012 Dec; 25(7):665-9. PubMed ID: 23063819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Judicial review of restrictions on gamete donation in Europe.
    Storrow RF
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2012 Dec; 25(7):655-9. PubMed ID: 23084881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. European Court of Human Rights. ECHR 2012/6. Case of S.H. and others v. Austria, 3 November 2011, no. 57813/00 (Grand Chamber).
    Dute J
    Eur J Health Law; 2012 Apr; 19(2):206-11. PubMed ID: 22558661
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Extraterritorial laws for cross-border reproductive care: the issue of legal diversity.
    Van Hoof W; Pennings G
    Eur J Health Law; 2012 Apr; 19(2):187-200. PubMed ID: 22558659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Human assisted procreation and human rights--the Greek response to the felt necessities of the time.
    Kriari-Catranis I
    Eur J Health Law; 2003 Sep; 10(3):271-80. PubMed ID: 14733044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The European Court legitimates access of Italian couples to assisted reproductive techniques and to pre-implantation genetic diagnosis.
    Turillazzi E; Frati P; Busardò FP; Gulino M; Fineschi V
    Med Sci Law; 2015 Jul; 55(3):194-200. PubMed ID: 24777348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Right to Access to Emergency Health Care: The European Court of Human Rights Pushes the Envelope.
    Nissen A
    Med Law Rev; 2018 Nov; 26(4):693-702. PubMed ID: 29240944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. First amendment -- California Supreme Court holds that free exercise of religion does not give fertility doctors right to deny treatment to lesbians. -- North Coast Women's Care Medical Group, Inc. v. San Diego County Superior Court, 189 P.3d 959 (Cal. 2008).
    Harv Law Rev; 2008 Dec; 122(2):787-94. PubMed ID: 19130682
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A human right to reproduce non-coitally? A comment on the Austrian Constitutional Court's judgment of 14 October 1999.
    Bernat E
    Univ Tasman Law Rev; 2002; 21(1):20-38. PubMed ID: 15214357
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Access to medical-assisted reproduction and pgd in Italian law: a deadly blow to an illiberal statute? commentary to the European Court on Human Rights's decision Costa and Pavan v Italy (ECtHR, 28 August 2012, App. 54270/2010).
    Biondi S
    Med Law Rev; 2013; 21(3):474-86. PubMed ID: 23552505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. European Court of Human Rights. ECHR 2010/12 Case of S.H. and others v. Austria, 1 April 2010, no. 57813/00 (First Section).
    Dute J
    Eur J Health Law; 2010 Jun; 17(3):307-13. PubMed ID: 20666293
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The regulation of assisted reproductive technology: a comparative study of permissive and prescriptive laws and policies.
    Petersen K
    J Law Med; 2002 May; 9(4):483-97. PubMed ID: 12194479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. S.H. and Others v. Austria.
    Jackson E
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2012 Dec; 25(7):663-4. PubMed ID: 23063823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Infertility around the globe: new thinking on gender, reproductive technologies and global movements in the 21st century.
    Inhorn MC; Patrizio P
    Hum Reprod Update; 2015; 21(4):411-26. PubMed ID: 25801630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Body, rights and comprehensive health: Analysis of the parliamentary debates on the Gender Identity and Assisted Fertilization Laws (Argentina, 2011-2013).
    Farji Neer A
    Salud Colect; 2015 Sep; 11(3):351-65. PubMed ID: 26418092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reproductive health information and abortion services: standards developed by the European Court of Human Rights.
    Westeson J
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2013 Aug; 122(2):173-6. PubMed ID: 23773435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. European court of human rights. ECHR 2007/7 Case of Istratii and others v. Moldova, 27 March 2007, no. 8721/05, 8705/05 and 8742/05 (Fourth Section).
    Dute J
    Eur J Health Law; 2007 Jul; 14(2):206-8. PubMed ID: 17847837
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.