These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23544472)

  • 1. Feedback reduces the metacognitive benefit of tests.
    Kornell N; Rhodes MG
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2013 Mar; 19(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 23544472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measuring memory monitoring with judgements of retention (JORs).
    Tauber SK; Rhodes MG
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(7):1376-96. PubMed ID: 22524495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of delaying judgments of learning on metacognitive accuracy: a meta-analytic review.
    Rhodes MG; Tauber SK
    Psychol Bull; 2011 Jan; 137(1):131-48. PubMed ID: 21219059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does delaying judgments of learning really improve the efficacy of study decisions? Not so much.
    Kimball DR; Smith TA; Muntean WJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jul; 38(4):923-54. PubMed ID: 22250913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Monitoring memory errors: the influence of the veracity of retrieved information on the accuracy of judgements of learning.
    Rhodes MG; Tauber SK
    Memory; 2011 Nov; 19(8):853-70. PubMed ID: 21999219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Metacognitive unawareness of the errorful generation benefit and its effects on self-regulated learning.
    Yang C; Potts R; Shanks DR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Jul; 43(7):1073-1092. PubMed ID: 28114778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The memorizing effort heuristic in judgments of learning: a developmental perspective.
    Koriat A; Ackerman R; Lockl K; Schneider W
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2009 Mar; 102(3):265-79. PubMed ID: 19084238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does the amount of material to be remembered influence judgements of learning (JOLs)?
    Tauber SK; Rhodes MG
    Memory; 2010 Apr; 18(3):351-62. PubMed ID: 20408044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Delayed, but not immediate, feedback after multiple-choice questions increases performance on a subsequent short-answer, but not multiple-choice, exam: evidence for the dual-process theory of memory.
    Sinha N; Glass AL
    J Gen Psychol; 2015; 142(2):118-34. PubMed ID: 25832741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Developmental changes and the effect of self-generated feedback in metacognitive controlled spacing strategies in 7-year-olds, 10-year-olds, and adults.
    Tsalas N; Paulus M; Sodian B
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2015 Apr; 132():140-54. PubMed ID: 25703006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Children's strategic regulation, metacognitive monitoring, and control processes during test taking.
    Krebs SS; Roebers CM
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2010 Sep; 80(Pt 3):325-40. PubMed ID: 20100399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attempting to answer a meaningful question enhances subsequent learning even when feedback is delayed.
    Kornell N
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):106-14. PubMed ID: 23855547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Test-enhanced learning of natural concepts: effects on recognition memory, classification, and metacognition.
    Jacoby LL; Wahlheim CN; Coane JH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Nov; 36(6):1441-51. PubMed ID: 20804279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multiple bases for young and older adults' judgments of learning in multitrial learning.
    Tauber SK; Rhodes MG
    Psychol Aging; 2012 Jun; 27(2):474-83. PubMed ID: 21942899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Metacognitive monitoring in visuospatial working memory.
    Thomas AK; Bonura BM; Taylor HA; Brunyé TT
    Psychol Aging; 2012 Dec; 27(4):1099-110. PubMed ID: 22663158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Judgments of learning do not reduce to memory encoding operations: event-related potential evidence for distinct metacognitive processes.
    Skavhaug IM; Wilding EL; Donaldson DI
    Brain Res; 2010 Mar; 1318():87-95. PubMed ID: 19968975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of feedback on predictions of future memory performance.
    Sitzman DM; Rhodes MG; Kornell N
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Oct; 44(7):1102-13. PubMed ID: 27245926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The benefit of generating errors during learning.
    Potts R; Shanks DR
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Apr; 143(2):644-67. PubMed ID: 23815457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Test-enhanced learning: taking memory tests improves long-term retention.
    Roediger HL; Karpicke JD
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Mar; 17(3):249-55. PubMed ID: 16507066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mending metacognitive illusions: a comparison of mnemonic-based and theory-based procedures.
    Koriat A; Bjork RA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Sep; 32(5):1133-45. PubMed ID: 16938051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.