These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23544475)

  • 1. The confidence-accuracy relationship for eyewitness identification decisions: Effects of exposure duration, retention interval, and divided attention.
    Palmer MA; Brewer N; Weber N; Nagesh A
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2013 Mar; 19(1):55-71. PubMed ID: 23544475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of retention interval on the confidence-accuracy relationship for eyewitness identification.
    Sauer J; Brewer N; Zweck T; Weber N
    Law Hum Behav; 2010 Aug; 34(4):337-47. PubMed ID: 19626432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Phenomenological reports diagnose accuracy of eyewitness identification decisions.
    Palmer MA; Brewer N; McKinnon AC; Weber N
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Feb; 133(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 19954764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The confidence-accuracy relationship in eyewitness identification: effects of lineup instructions, foil similarity, and target-absent base rates.
    Brewer N; Wells GL
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2006 Mar; 12(1):11-30. PubMed ID: 16536656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Children's metacognitive judgments in an eyewitness identification task.
    Keast A; Brewer N; Wells GL
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2007 Aug; 97(4):286-314. PubMed ID: 17512942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The confidence-accuracy relationship in eyewitness identification: the effects of reflection and disconfirmation on correlation and calibration.
    Brewer N; Keast A; Rishworth A
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2002 Mar; 8(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 12009176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Exposure duration: effects on eyewitness accuracy and confidence.
    Memon A; Hope L; Bull R
    Br J Psychol; 2003 Aug; 94(Pt 3):339-54. PubMed ID: 14511547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The mitigating effects of suspicion on post-identification feedback and on retrospective eyewitness memory.
    Neuschatz JS; Lawson DS; Fairless AH; Powers RA; Neuschatz JS; Goodsell CA; Toglia MP
    Law Hum Behav; 2007 Jun; 31(3):231-47. PubMed ID: 17253155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing nonchoosers' eyewitness identification accuracy from photographic showups by using confidence and response times.
    Sauerland M; Sagana A; Sporer SL
    Law Hum Behav; 2012 Oct; 36(5):394-403. PubMed ID: 23030820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multiple confidence estimates as indices of eyewitness memory.
    Sauer JD; Brewer N; Weber N
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Aug; 137(3):528-47. PubMed ID: 18729714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Recalling a witnessed event increases eyewitness suggestibility: the reversed testing effect.
    Chan JC; Thomas AK; Bulevich JB
    Psychol Sci; 2009 Jan; 20(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 19037905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predictors of eyewitness identification decisions from video lineups in England: a field study.
    Horry R; Memon A; Wright DB; Milne R
    Law Hum Behav; 2012 Aug; 36(4):257-65. PubMed ID: 22849411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How variations in distance affect eyewitness reports and identification accuracy.
    Lindsay RC; Semmler C; Weber N; Brewer N; Lindsay MR
    Law Hum Behav; 2008 Dec; 32(6):526-35. PubMed ID: 18253819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of postidentification feedback on eyewitness identification and nonidentification confidence.
    Semmler C; Brewer N; Wells GL
    J Appl Psychol; 2004 Apr; 89(2):334-46. PubMed ID: 15065979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attention and perceptual implicit memory: effects of selective versus divided attention and number of visual objects.
    Mulligan NW
    Psychol Res; 2002 Aug; 66(3):157-65. PubMed ID: 12192444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Eyewitness confidence in simultaneous and sequential lineups: a criterion shift account for sequential mistaken identification overconfidence.
    Dobolyi DG; Dodson CS
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2013 Dec; 19(4):345-57. PubMed ID: 24188335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The contributions of encoding, retention, and recall to the Hebb effect.
    Oberauer K; Meyer N
    Memory; 2009 Oct; 17(7):774-81. PubMed ID: 19598058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Witnesses' blindness for their own facial recognition decisions: a field study.
    Sagana A; Sauerland M; Merckelbach H
    Behav Sci Law; 2013; 31(5):624-36. PubMed ID: 24019073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fast and confident: postdicting eyewitness identification accuracy in a field study.
    Sauerland M; Sporer SL
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Mar; 15(1):46-62. PubMed ID: 19309216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of divided attention at study and reporting procedure on regulation and monitoring for episodic recall.
    Sauer J; Hope L
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Sep; 169():143-56. PubMed ID: 27311110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.