These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
25. Sequential lineup laps and eyewitness accuracy. Steblay NK; Dietrich HL; Ryan SL; Raczynski JL; James KA Law Hum Behav; 2011 Aug; 35(4):262-74. PubMed ID: 20632113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The emotional eyewitness: the effects of emotion on specific aspects of eyewitness recall and recognition performance. Houston KA; Clifford BR; Phillips LH; Memon A Emotion; 2013 Feb; 13(1):118-28. PubMed ID: 22775133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Identifying the bad guy in a lineup using confidence judgments under deadline pressure. Brewer N; Weber N; Wootton D; Lindsay DS Psychol Sci; 2012 Oct; 23(10):1208-14. PubMed ID: 22933457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Confidence-accuracy calibration in absolute and relative face recognition judgments. Weber N; Brewer N J Exp Psychol Appl; 2004 Sep; 10(3):156-72. PubMed ID: 15462618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Does methodology matter in eyewitness identification research? The effect of live versus video exposure on eyewitness identification accuracy. Pozzulo JD; Crescini C; Panton T Int J Law Psychiatry; 2008; 31(5):430-7. PubMed ID: 18790535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Fact learning: how information accuracy, delay, and repeated testing change retention and retrieval experience. Barber SJ; Rajaram S; Marsh EJ Memory; 2008 Nov; 16(8):934-46. PubMed ID: 18949663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Practice and feedback effects on the confidence-accuracy relation in eyewitness memory. Perfect TJ; Hollins TS; Hunt AL Memory; 2000 Jul; 8(4):235-44. PubMed ID: 10932793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Recognition memory for valenced and arousing materials under conditions of divided attention. Clark-Foos A; Marsh RL Memory; 2008; 16(5):530-7. PubMed ID: 18569681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Face distinctiveness and delayed testing: differential effects on performance and confidence. Metzger MM J Gen Psychol; 2006 Apr; 133(2):209-16. PubMed ID: 16705913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Retention interval and eyewitness memory for events and personal identifying attributes. Ebbesen EB; Rienick CB J Appl Psychol; 1998 Oct; 83(5):745-62. PubMed ID: 9806014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The information gained from witnesses' responses to an initial "blank" lineup. Palmer MA; Brewer N; Weber N Law Hum Behav; 2012 Oct; 36(5):439-47. PubMed ID: 22468758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Eyewitness identification accuracy and response latency. Brewer N; Caon A; Todd C; Weber N Law Hum Behav; 2006 Feb; 30(1):31-50. PubMed ID: 16729207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Biased lineup instructions and face identification from video images. Thompson WB; Johnson J J Gen Psychol; 2008 Jan; 135(1):23-36. PubMed ID: 18318406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The effect of judgment type and confidence scale on confidence-accuracy calibration in face recognition. Weber N; Brewer N J Appl Psychol; 2003 Jun; 88(3):490-9. PubMed ID: 12814297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Confidence-accuracy resolution in the misinformation paradigm is influenced by the availability of source cues. Horry R; Colton LM; Williamson P Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Sep; 151():164-73. PubMed ID: 24983514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]