267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23544487)
1. [Maternal cell contamination of prenatal samples and the potential effects on prenatal diagnosis results].
Hou QF; Liao SX; Li T; Yang YL; Zhang ZY; Chu Y
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Feb; 48(2):86-91. PubMed ID: 23544487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Maternal cell contamination of prenatal samples assessed by QF-PCR genotyping.
Stojilkovic-Mikic T; Mann K; Docherty Z; Mackie Ogilvie C
Prenat Diagn; 2005 Jan; 25(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 15662689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Testing for maternal cell contamination in prenatal samples: a comprehensive survey of current diagnostic practices in 35 molecular diagnostic laboratories.
Schrijver I; Cherny SC; Zehnder JL
J Mol Diagn; 2007 Jul; 9(3):394-400. PubMed ID: 17591939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A simple and effective approach for detecting maternal cell contamination in molecular prenatal diagnosis.
Antoniadi T; Yapijakis C; Kaminopetros P; Makatsoris C; Velissariou V; Vassilopoulos D; Petersen MB
Prenat Diagn; 2002 May; 22(5):425-9. PubMed ID: 12001201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Karyotype analysis of amniotic fluid cells and comparison of chromosomal abnormality rate during second trimester].
Zhang YP; Wu JP; Li XT; Lei CX; Xu JZ; Yin M
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Sep; 46(9):644-8. PubMed ID: 22176986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The detection of aneuploidy and maternal contamination by QF-PCR in samples undergoing prenatal diagnosis for thalassemia in Southern China.
Liao C; Yang X; Li FT; Li J; Li DZ
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 Jun; 144(2):149-52. PubMed ID: 19375212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prevalence of maternal cell contamination in amniotic fluid samples.
Weida J; Patil AS; Schubert FP; Vance G; Drendel H; Reese A; Dlouhy S; Bai S; Lee MJ
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Sep; 30(17):2133-2137. PubMed ID: 27744775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. QF-PCR: application, overview and review of the literature.
Mann K; Ogilvie CM
Prenat Diagn; 2012 Apr; 32(4):309-14. PubMed ID: 22467160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Invasive prenatal diagnosis of fetal thalassemia.
Li DZ; Yang YD
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2017 Feb; 39():41-52. PubMed ID: 27889305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prenatal cytogenetic diagnosis. Amniotic cell culture versus chorionic villus sampling.
Bell JA; Pearn JH; Smith A
Med J Aust; 1987 Jan; 146(1):27-9. PubMed ID: 3796391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prenatal diagnosis of uniparental disomy 15 following trisomy 15 mosaicism.
Christian SL; Smith AC; Macha M; Black SH; Elder FF; Johnson JM; Resta RG; Surti U; Suslak L; Verp MS; Ledbetter DH
Prenat Diagn; 1996 Apr; 16(4):323-32. PubMed ID: 8734806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prenatal BACs-on-Beads™: the prospective experience of five prenatal diagnosis laboratories.
Vialard F; Simoni G; Gomes DM; Abourra A; De Toffol S; Bru F; Martinez Romero MC; Nitsch L; Bouhanna P; Marcato L; Popowski T; Grimi B; Martínez-Conejero JA; Benzacken B; Genesio R; Grati FR
Prenat Diagn; 2012 Apr; 32(4):329-35. PubMed ID: 22467163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Clinical application of noninvasive prenatal diagnosis using cell free fetal DNA in maternal plasma].
Hou QF; Wu D; Chu Y; Kang B; Liao SX; Yang YL; Zhang CY; Zhang JX; Wu G
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Nov; 47(11):813-7. PubMed ID: 23302120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Maternal cell contamination in amniotic fluid samples as a consequence of the sampling technique.
Nuss S; Brebaum D; Grond-Ginsbach C
Hum Genet; 1994 Feb; 93(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 8112733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis in a diagnostic laboratory; experience with >1000 cases and review of the literature.
Breman A; Pursley AN; Hixson P; Bi W; Ward P; Bacino CA; Shaw C; Lupski JR; Beaudet A; Patel A; Cheung SW; Van den Veyver I
Prenat Diagn; 2012 Apr; 32(4):351-61. PubMed ID: 22467166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Interpretation of chorionic villus sampling laboratory results is just as reliable as amniocentesis.
Wright DJ; Brindley BA; Koppitch FC; Drugan A; Johnson MP; Evans MI
Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Nov; 74(5):739-44. PubMed ID: 2812650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Postnatal and prenatal diagnosis of mucopolysaccharidosis type II (Hunter syndrome)].
Zhang WM; Shi HP; Li BT; Zhao SM; Qi QW; Sun NH; Huang SZ
Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Sep; 44(9):644-7. PubMed ID: 17217652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Prenatal diagnosis].
Miny P; Tercanli S; Gänshirt D; Holzgreve W
Ther Umsch; 1995 Dec; 52(12):792-800. PubMed ID: 8539649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Detection of mosaicism for primary trisomies in prenatal samples by QF-PCR and karyotype analysis.
Donaghue C; Mann K; Docherty Z; Ogilvie CM
Prenat Diagn; 2005 Jan; 25(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 15662691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biochemical analysis of cultured chorionic villi for the prenatal diagnosis of peroxisomal disorders: biochemical thresholds and molecular sensitivity for maternal cell contamination detection.
Steinberg S; Katsanis S; Moser A; Cutting G
J Med Genet; 2005 Jan; 42(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 15635073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
