These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Electric-field-enhanced transport in polyacrylamide hydrogel nanocomposites. Hill RJ J Colloid Interface Sci; 2007 Dec; 316(2):635-44. PubMed ID: 17915246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Nanoparticle transport in conical-shaped nanopores. Lan WJ; Holden DA; Zhang B; White HS Anal Chem; 2011 May; 83(10):3840-7. PubMed ID: 21495727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Numerical analysis of field-modulated electroosmotic flows in microchannels with arbitrary numbers and configurations of discrete electrodes. Chao K; Chen B; Wu J Biomed Microdevices; 2010 Dec; 12(6):959-66. PubMed ID: 20668948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Electrokinetic transport through the nanopores in cell membrane during electroporation. Movahed S; Li D J Colloid Interface Sci; 2012 Mar; 369(1):442-52. PubMed ID: 22226500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Electrokinetic translocation of a deformable nanoparticle controlled by field effect in nanopores. He X; Wang P; Shi L; Zhou T; Wen L Electrophoresis; 2021 Nov; 42(21-22):2197-2205. PubMed ID: 34409625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Electrokinetic particle translocation through a nanopore. Ai Y; Qian S Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2011 Mar; 13(9):4060-71. PubMed ID: 21229154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Theoretical and experimental analysis of conductivity, ion diffusion and molecular transport during cell electroporation--relation between short-lived and long-lived pores. Pavlin M; Miklavcic D Bioelectrochemistry; 2008 Nov; 74(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 18499534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Electrodiffusiophoretic motion of a charged spherical particle in a nanopore. Yalcin SE; Lee SY; Joo SW; Baysal O; Qian S J Phys Chem B; 2010 Mar; 114(11):4082-93. PubMed ID: 20196581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Electrokinetic transport through nanochannels. Movahed S; Li D Electrophoresis; 2011 Jun; 32(11):1259-67. PubMed ID: 21538982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accurate characterization of single track-etched, conical nanopores. Apel PY; Ramirez P; Blonskaya IV; Orelovitch OL; Sartowska BA Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2014 Aug; 16(29):15214-23. PubMed ID: 24939748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Modeling and simulation of nanoparticle separation through a solid-state nanopore. Jubery TZ; Prabhu AS; Kim MJ; Dutta P Electrophoresis; 2012 Jan; 33(2):325-33. PubMed ID: 22222977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Role of Particle Focusing in Resistive-Pulse Technique: Direction-Dependent Velocity in Micropores. Qiu Y; Vlassiouk I; Hinkle P; Toimil-Molares ME; Levine AJ; Siwy ZS ACS Nano; 2016 Mar; 10(3):3509-17. PubMed ID: 26901283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Transient electrophoretic motion of a charged particle through a converging-diverging microchannel: effect of direct current-dielectrophoretic force. Ai Y; Joo SW; Jiang Y; Xuan X; Qian S Electrophoresis; 2009 Jul; 30(14):2499-506. PubMed ID: 19639572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the multiphasic model and the transport model for the swelling and deformation of polyelectrolyte hydrogels. Feng L; Jia Y; Li X; An L J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2011 Oct; 4(7):1328-35. PubMed ID: 21783142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The estimation of pore size distribution of electroporated MCF-7 cell membrane. Eşmekaya MA; Gürsoy G; Coşkun A Electromagn Biol Med; 2024 Jul; 43(3):176-186. PubMed ID: 38900674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Modeling of electric-stimulus-responsive hydrogels immersed in different bathing solutions. Luo R; Li H; Birgersson E; Lam KY J Biomed Mater Res A; 2008 Apr; 85(1):248-57. PubMed ID: 17688273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]