These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
381 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23546302)
1. High permeability and salt rejection reverse osmosis by a zeolite nano-membrane. Liu Y; Chen X Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2013 May; 15(18):6817-24. PubMed ID: 23546302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Exceptionally fast water desalination at complete salt rejection by pristine graphyne monolayers. Xue M; Qiu H; Guo W Nanotechnology; 2013 Dec; 24(50):505720. PubMed ID: 24285308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Enhanced water transport and salt rejection through hydrophobic zeolite pores. Humplik T; Lee J; O'Hern S; Laoui T; Karnik R; Wang EN Nanotechnology; 2017 Dec; 28(50):505703. PubMed ID: 29091586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the removal of hydrophobic trace organic contaminants by forward osmosis and reverse osmosis. Xie M; Nghiem LD; Price WE; Elimelech M Water Res; 2012 May; 46(8):2683-92. PubMed ID: 22402269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Separation of BSA through FAU-type zeolite ceramic composite membrane formed on tubular ceramic support: Optimization of process parameters by hybrid response surface methodology and biobjective genetic algorithm. Vinoth Kumar R; Ganesh Moorthy I; Pugazhenthi G Prep Biochem Biotechnol; 2017 Aug; 47(7):687-698. PubMed ID: 28277946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tailoring the structure of thin film nanocomposite membranes to achieve seawater RO membrane performance. Lind ML; Eumine Suk D; Nguyen TV; Hoek EM Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Nov; 44(21):8230-5. PubMed ID: 20942398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Surfactant solutions and porous substrates: spreading and imbibition. Starov VM Adv Colloid Interface Sci; 2004 Nov; 111(1-2):3-27. PubMed ID: 15571660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Experimental investigation of a spiral-wound pressure-retarded osmosis membrane module for osmotic power generation. Kim YC; Kim Y; Oh D; Lee KH Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Mar; 47(6):2966-73. PubMed ID: 23398240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Permeability and selectivity of reverse osmosis membranes: correlation to swelling revisited. Dražević E; Košutić K; Freger V Water Res; 2014 Feb; 49():444-52. PubMed ID: 24216230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relating rejection of trace organic contaminants to membrane properties in forward osmosis: measurements, modelling and implications. Xie M; Nghiem LD; Price WE; Elimelech M Water Res; 2014 Feb; 49():265-74. PubMed ID: 24345822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of zeolite crystal size on zeolite-polyamide thin film nanocomposite membranes. Lind ML; Ghosh AK; Jawor A; Huang X; Hou W; Yang Y; Hoek EM Langmuir; 2009 Sep; 25(17):10139-45. PubMed ID: 19527039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fabrication of graphene-oxide and zeolite loaded polyvinylidene fluoride reverse osmosis membrane for saltwater remediation. Hassan F; Mushtaq R; Saghar S; Younas U; Pervaiz M; Aljuwayid AM; Habila MA; Sillanpaa M Chemosphere; 2022 Nov; 307(Pt 3):136012. PubMed ID: 35970211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of hydrophilic defects on water transport in MFI zeolites. Humplik T; Raj R; Maroo SC; Laoui T; Wang EN Langmuir; 2014 Jun; 30(22):6446-53. PubMed ID: 24810585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Vacuum membrane distillation of seawater reverse osmosis brines. Mericq JP; Laborie S; Cabassud C Water Res; 2010 Oct; 44(18):5260-73. PubMed ID: 20659753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cross flow ultrafiltration of Cr (VI) using MCM-41, MCM-48 and Faujasite (FAU) zeolite-ceramic composite membranes. Basumatary AK; Kumar RV; Ghoshal AK; Pugazhenthi G Chemosphere; 2016 Jun; 153():436-46. PubMed ID: 27031807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Thin-film composite pressure retarded osmosis membranes for sustainable power generation from salinity gradients. Yip NY; Tiraferri A; Phillip WA; Schiffman JD; Hoover LA; Kim YC; Elimelech M Environ Sci Technol; 2011 May; 45(10):4360-9. PubMed ID: 21491936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. High performance RO membranes for desalination and wastewater reclamation and their operation results. Henmi M; Fusaoka Y; Tomioka H; Kurihara M Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(9):2134-40. PubMed ID: 21045342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hydrophilic nanofibers as new supports for thin film composite membranes for engineered osmosis. Bui NN; McCutcheon JR Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Feb; 47(3):1761-9. PubMed ID: 23234259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Zeolitic octahedral metal oxide-based membranes for pervaporative desalination of concentrated brines. Chen C; Zeng W; Zhu Q; Zhang Z; Li Y; Ueda W Chem Commun (Camb); 2021 Mar; 57(19):2420-2423. PubMed ID: 33554977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Salt and Water Transport in Reverse Osmosis Membranes: Beyond the Solution-Diffusion Model. Wang L; Cao T; Dykstra JE; Porada S; Biesheuvel PM; Elimelech M Environ Sci Technol; 2021 Dec; 55(24):16665-16675. PubMed ID: 34879196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]