105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23546757)
21. Establishing clonal cell lines with endothelial-like potential from CD9(hi), SSEA-1(-) cells in embryonic stem cell-derived embryoid bodies.
Lian Q; Yeo KS; Que J; Tan EK; Yu F; Yin Y; Salto-Tellez M; Menshawe El Oakley R; Lim SK
PLoS One; 2006 Dec; 1(1):e6. PubMed ID: 17183690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparative analysis of human embryonic stem cell and induced pluripotent stem cell-derived hepatocyte-like cells reveals current drawbacks and possible strategies for improved differentiation.
Jozefczuk J; Prigione A; Chavez L; Adjaye J
Stem Cells Dev; 2011 Jul; 20(7):1259-75. PubMed ID: 21162674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Dynamic transcriptional and epigenomic reprogramming from pediatric nasal epithelial cells to induced pluripotent stem cells.
Ji H; Zhang X; Oh S; Mayhew CN; Ulm A; Somineni HK; Ericksen M; Wells JM; Khurana Hershey GK
J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2015 Jan; 135(1):236-44. PubMed ID: 25441642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Defining pluripotent stem cells through quantitative proteomic analysis.
Reiland S; Salekdeh GH; Krijgsveld J
Expert Rev Proteomics; 2011 Feb; 8(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 21329426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Conversion of ancestral fibroblasts to induced pluripotent stem cells.
Araki R; Jincho Y; Hoki Y; Nakamura M; Tamura C; Ando S; Kasama Y; Abe M
Stem Cells; 2010 Feb; 28(2):213-20. PubMed ID: 20020427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Identification of microRNAs regulated by activin A in human embryonic stem cells.
Tsai ZY; Singh S; Yu SL; Kao LP; Chen BZ; Ho BC; Yang PC; Li SS
J Cell Biochem; 2010 Jan; 109(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 19885849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Cellular characterization of human pluripotent stem cells.
Quintanilla RH
Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 997():179-90. PubMed ID: 23546756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Human testis-derived embryonic stem cell-like cells are not pluripotent, but possess potential of mesenchymal progenitors.
Chikhovskaya JV; Jonker MJ; Meissner A; Breit TM; Repping S; van Pelt AM
Hum Reprod; 2012 Jan; 27(1):210-21. PubMed ID: 22095788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A stable chimeric fibroblast growth factor (FGF) can successfully replace basic FGF in human pluripotent stem cell culture.
Onuma Y; Higuchi K; Aiki Y; Shu Y; Asada M; Asashima M; Suzuki M; Imamura T; Ito Y
PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0118931. PubMed ID: 25850016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Characterizing Pluripotent Stem Cells Using the TaqMan® hPSC Scorecard(TM) Panel.
Fergus J; Quintanilla R; Lakshmipathy U
Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1307():25-37. PubMed ID: 25138722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparative transcriptomic analysis identifies reprogramming and differentiation genes differentially expressed in UiPSCs and ESCs.
Shi L; Cui Y; Zhou X; Luan J; Wang L; Han J
Biosci Trends; 2017 Jul; 11(3):355-359. PubMed ID: 28529265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Quantitative glycomics monitoring of induced pluripotent- and embryonic stem cells during neuronal differentiation.
Terashima M; Amano M; Onodera T; Nishimura S; Iwasaki N
Stem Cell Res; 2014 Nov; 13(3 Pt A):454-64. PubMed ID: 25460606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparing the mitochondrial signatures in ESCs and iPSCs and their neural derivations.
Kristiansen CK; Chen A; Høyland LE; Ziegler M; Sullivan GJ; Bindoff LA; Liang KX
Cell Cycle; 2022 Oct; 21(20):2206-2221. PubMed ID: 35815665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparative gene expression signature of pig, human and mouse induced pluripotent stem cell lines reveals insight into pig pluripotency gene networks.
Liu Y; Ma Y; Yang JY; Cheng D; Liu X; Ma X; West FD; Wang H
Stem Cell Rev Rep; 2014 Apr; 10(2):162-76. PubMed ID: 24338594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Analysis of Mitochondrial DNA in Induced Pluripotent and Embryonic Stem Cells.
Lee W; Kelly RD; Yeung KY; Cagnone G; McKenzie M; St John JC
Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1330():219-52. PubMed ID: 26621601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Functional modules distinguish human induced pluripotent stem cells from embryonic stem cells.
Wang A; Huang K; Shen Y; Xue Z; Cai C; Horvath S; Fan G
Stem Cells Dev; 2011 Nov; 20(11):1937-50. PubMed ID: 21542696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Integrated transcriptome and binding sites analysis implicates E2F in the regulation of self-renewal in human pluripotent stem cells.
Yeo HC; Beh TT; Quek JJ; Koh G; Chan KK; Lee DY
PLoS One; 2011; 6(11):e27231. PubMed ID: 22076139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparative Metabolomic Profiling of Rat Embryonic and Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells.
Sherstyuk VV; Yanshole LV; Zelentsova EA; Melnikov AD; Medvedev SP; Tsentalovich YP; Zakian SM
Stem Cell Rev Rep; 2020 Dec; 16(6):1256-1265. PubMed ID: 33047280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The SOX transcription factors as key players in pluripotent stem cells.
Abdelalim EM; Emara MM; Kolatkar PR
Stem Cells Dev; 2014 Nov; 23(22):2687-99. PubMed ID: 25127330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A quantitative system for discriminating induced pluripotent stem cells, embryonic stem cells and somatic cells.
Wang A; Du Y; He Q; Zhou C
PLoS One; 2013; 8(2):e56095. PubMed ID: 23418520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
