These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2354696)

  • 1. The effects of task duration on psychophysically-determined maximum acceptable weights and forces.
    Ciriello VM; Snook SH; Blick AC; Wilkinson PL
    Ergonomics; 1990 Feb; 33(2):187-200. PubMed ID: 2354696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of container size, frequency and extended horizontal reach on maximum acceptable weights of lifting for female industrial workers.
    Ciriello VM
    Appl Ergon; 2007 Jan; 38(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 16616883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Secular changes in psychophysically determined maximum acceptable weights and forces over 20 years for male industrial workers.
    Ciriello VM; Dempsey PG; Maikala RV; O'Brien NV
    Ergonomics; 2008 May; 51(5):593-601. PubMed ID: 18432440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Maximum acceptable forces of dynamic pushing: comparison of two techniques.
    Ciriello VM; McGorry RW; Martin SE; Bezverkhny IB
    Ergonomics; 1999 Jan; 42(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 9973870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Psychophysically determined horizontal and vertical forces of dynamic pushing on high and low coefficient of friction floors for female industrial workers.
    Ciriello VM
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2005 Mar; 2(3):136-42. PubMed ID: 15764537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Psychophysically determined forces of dynamic pushing for female industrial workers: Comparison of two apparatuses.
    Ciriello VM; Maikala RV; Dempsey PG; O'Brien NV
    Appl Ergon; 2010 Jan; 41(1):141-5. PubMed ID: 19628201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The design of manual handling tasks: revised tables of maximum acceptable weights and forces.
    Snook SH; Ciriello VM
    Ergonomics; 1991 Sep; 34(9):1197-213. PubMed ID: 1743178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Gender differences in psychophysically determined maximum acceptable weights and forces for industrial workers observed after twenty years.
    Ciriello VM; Maikala RV; Dempsey PG; O'Brien NV
    Int Arch Occup Environ Health; 2011 Jun; 84(5):569-75. PubMed ID: 20953621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Acceptable weights and physiological costs of performing combined manual handling tasks in restricted postures.
    Gallagher S
    Ergonomics; 1991 Jul; 34(7):939-52. PubMed ID: 1915255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minimal acceptable handling time intervals for lifting and lowering tasks.
    Lee TH
    Appl Ergon; 2003 Nov; 34(6):629-34. PubMed ID: 14559424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Physiological and psychophysical responses in handling maximum acceptable weights under different footwear--floor friction conditions.
    Li KW; Yu RF; Han XL
    Appl Ergon; 2007 May; 38(3):259-65. PubMed ID: 17010302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Further studies of psychophysically determined maximum acceptable weights and forces.
    Ciriello VM; Snook SH; Hughes GJ
    Hum Factors; 1993 Mar; 35(1):175-86. PubMed ID: 8509102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Maximum acceptable weights for asymmetric lifting of Chinese females.
    Wu SP
    Appl Ergon; 2003 May; 34(3):215-24. PubMed ID: 12737921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Psychophysically acceptable weights for a combination lifting task using bags with handles.
    Fredericks TK; Fernandez JE; Rodrigues CC
    J Hum Ergol (Tokyo); 1994 Dec; 23(2):101-9. PubMed ID: 7730595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Maximum weights and work loads acceptable to male industrial workers. A study of lifting, lowering, pushing, pulling, carrying, and walking tasks.
    Snook SH; Irvine CH; Bass SF
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1970; 31(5):579-86. PubMed ID: 5488305
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Psychophysical acceptability and perception of load heaviness by females.
    Karwowski W
    Ergonomics; 1991 Apr; 34(4):487-96. PubMed ID: 1860464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparative study of methods for establishing load handling capabilities.
    Nicholson AS
    Ergonomics; 1989 Sep; 32(9):1125-44. PubMed ID: 2680481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of asymmetric dynamic and isometric liftings on strength/force and rating of perceived exertion.
    Hattori Y; Ono Y; Shimaoka M; Hiruta S; Kamijima M; Shibata E; Ichihara G; Ando S; Villaneuva MB; Takeuchi Y
    Ergonomics; 1996 Jun; 39(6):862-76. PubMed ID: 8681928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Maximum acceptable repetitive lifting workload by Chinese subjects.
    Zhu ZX; Zhang ZJ
    Ergonomics; 1990 Jul; 33(7):875-84. PubMed ID: 2226423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of risk assessment of single and combination manual handling tasks: 2. Discomfort, rating of perceived exertion and heart rate measures.
    Straker LM; Stevenson MG; Twomey LT
    Ergonomics; 1997 Jun; 40(6):656-69. PubMed ID: 9174417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.