These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2354696)

  • 21. A manual materials handling study of bag lifting.
    Smith JL; Jiang BC
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1984 Aug; 45(8):505-8. PubMed ID: 6475757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Psychophysical determination of load carrying capacity for a 1-h work period by Chinese males.
    Wu SP; Chen CC
    Ergonomics; 2001 Sep; 44(11):1008-23. PubMed ID: 11693245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Oxygen consumption prediction models for individual and combination materials handling tasks.
    Dempsey PG; Ciriello VM; Maikala RV; O'Brien NV
    Ergonomics; 2008 Nov; 51(11):1776-89. PubMed ID: 18941980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Psychophysical lifting capacity over extended periods.
    Fernandez JE; Ayoub MM; Smith JL
    Ergonomics; 1991 Jan; 34(1):23-32. PubMed ID: 2009847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A critical review of biomechanical, epidemiological, physiological and psychophysical criteria for designing manual materials handling tasks.
    Dempsey PG
    Ergonomics; 1998 Jan; 41(1):73-88. PubMed ID: 9468807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of lifting frequency and technique on physical fatigue with special reference to psychophysical methodology and metabolic rate.
    Garg A; Saxena U
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1979 Oct; 40(10):894-503. PubMed ID: 525616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Maximum acceptable weight of lift for side and back lifting.
    Lee K; Waikar A; Aghazadeh F
    J Hum Ergol (Tokyo); 1990 Jun; 19(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 2092069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A comparison of isokinetic lifting strength with static strength and maximum acceptable weight with special reference to speed of lifting.
    Garg A; Beller D
    Ergonomics; 1994 Aug; 37(8):1363-74. PubMed ID: 7925260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Rating of acceptable load in manual sorting of postal parcels.
    Stålhammar HR; Louhevaara V; Troup JD
    Ergonomics; 1996 Oct; 39(10):1214-20. PubMed ID: 8876080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The validity of the use of heart rate in estimating oxygen consumption in static and in combined static/dynamic exercise.
    Maas S; Kok ML; Westra HG; Kemper HC
    Ergonomics; 1989 Feb; 32(2):141-8. PubMed ID: 2714245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Gender differences in exerted forces and physiological load during pushing and pulling of wheeled cages by postal workers.
    van der Beek AJ; Kluver BD; Frings-Dresen MH; Hoozemans MJ
    Ergonomics; 2000 Feb; 43(2):269-81. PubMed ID: 10675063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Psychophysical frequency and sustained exertion at varying wrist postures for a drilling task.
    Marley RJ; Fernandez JE
    Ergonomics; 1995 Feb; 38(2):303-25. PubMed ID: 7895737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Ergonomic study of a vertical rope-pulling task from a scaffolding.
    Wu SP; Ho CP; Chi HC
    Ergonomics; 2008 Mar; 51(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 18311611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Perceived exertion of physical effort for various manual handling tasks.
    Asfour SS; Ayoub MM; Mital A; Bethea NJ
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1983 Mar; 44(3):223-8. PubMed ID: 6846149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Physiologic responses to static, dynamic and combined work.
    Asfour SS; Genaidy AM; Khalil TM; Muthuswamy S
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1986 Dec; 47(12):798-802. PubMed ID: 3799482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparative analysis of the workload in seated and standing horizontal submaximal lifting tasks.
    Lee YH; Chen YL
    Ergonomics; 1995 Sep; 38(9):1859-66. PubMed ID: 7671863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of task variables and their interactions in lifting and lowering loads.
    Mital A; Ayoub MM
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1981 Feb; 42(2):134-42. PubMed ID: 7234678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Physiological workload evaluation of carrying soft drink beverage boxes on the back.
    Chung MK; Lee YJ; Lee I; Choi KI
    Appl Ergon; 2005 Sep; 36(5):569-74. PubMed ID: 15913538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Maximum weights and work loads acceptable to female workers.
    Snook SH; Ciriello VM
    J Occup Med; 1974 Aug; 16(8):527-34. PubMed ID: 4843402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Spine loading as a function of lift frequency, exposure duration, and work experience.
    Marras WS; Parakkat J; Chany AM; Yang G; Burr D; Lavender SA
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2006 May; 21(4):345-52. PubMed ID: 16310299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.