These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23547036)

  • 1. Inaccuracy in determining mean arterial pressure with oscillometric blood pressure techniques.
    Vos J; Vincent HH; Verhaar MC; Bos WJ
    Am J Hypertens; 2013 May; 26(5):624-9. PubMed ID: 23547036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measurement accuracy of a stand-alone oscillometric central blood pressure monitor: a validation report for Microlife WatchBP Office Central.
    Cheng HM; Sung SH; Shih YT; Chuang SY; Yu WC; Chen CH
    Am J Hypertens; 2013 Jan; 26(1):42-50. PubMed ID: 23382326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Oscillometric blood pressure measurement used for calibration of the arterial tonometry method contributes significantly to error.
    Hansen S; Staber M
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2006 Sep; 23(9):781-7. PubMed ID: 16723049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of central blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes: a comparison between SphygmoCor and invasively measured values.
    Laugesen E; Rossen NB; Peters CD; Mæng M; Ebbehøj E; Knudsen ST; Hansen KW; Bøtker HE; Poulsen PL
    Am J Hypertens; 2014 Feb; 27(2):169-76. PubMed ID: 24304654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of blood pressure and pulse pressure values obtained by oscillometric and central measurements in hypertensive patients.
    Kayrak M; Ulgen MS; Yazici M; Yilmaz R; Demir K; Dogan Y; Ozhan H; Alihanoglu Y; Koc F; Bodur S
    Blood Press; 2010 Apr; 19(2):98-103. PubMed ID: 20070247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimating central systolic blood pressure during oscillometric determination of blood pressure: proof of concept and validation by comparison with intra-aortic pressure recording and arterial tonometry.
    Brett SE; Guilcher A; Clapp B; Chowienczyk P
    Blood Press Monit; 2012 Jun; 17(3):132-6. PubMed ID: 22466804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validation of oscillometric pulse wave analysis measurements in children.
    Stoner L; Lambrick DM; Westrupp N; Young J; Faulkner J
    Am J Hypertens; 2014 Jun; 27(6):865-72. PubMed ID: 24390294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Oscillometry and applanation tonometry measurements in older individuals with elevated levels of arterial stiffness.
    van Dijk SC; Enneman AW; Swart KM; van Schoor NM; Uitterlinden AG; Smulders YM; van den Meiracker AH; van der Velde N; Mattace-Raso FU
    Blood Press Monit; 2013 Dec; 18(6):332-8. PubMed ID: 24192847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measurement of central aortic pulse pressure: noninvasive brachial cuff-based estimation by a transfer function vs. a novel pulse wave analysis method.
    Cheng HM; Sung SH; Shih YT; Chuang SY; Yu WC; Chen CH
    Am J Hypertens; 2012 Nov; 25(11):1162-9. PubMed ID: 22874891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Oscillometric estimation of central blood pressure: validation of the Mobil-O-Graph in comparison with the SphygmoCor device.
    Weiss W; Gohlisch C; Harsch-Gladisch C; Tölle M; Zidek W; van der Giet M
    Blood Press Monit; 2012 Jun; 17(3):128-31. PubMed ID: 22561735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Augmented blood pressure measurement through the noninvasive estimation of physiological arterial pressure variability.
    Soueidan K; Chen S; Dajani HR; Bolic M; Groza V
    Physiol Meas; 2012 Jun; 33(6):881-99. PubMed ID: 22551623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of automated oscillometric versus auscultatory blood pressure measurement.
    Landgraf J; Wishner SH; Kloner RA
    Am J Cardiol; 2010 Aug; 106(3):386-8. PubMed ID: 20643251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Random zero sphygmomanometer versus automatic oscillometric blood pressure monitor; is either the instrument of choice?
    Goonasekera CD; Dillon MJ
    J Hum Hypertens; 1995 Nov; 9(11):885-9. PubMed ID: 8583467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation of the noninvasive assessment of central blood pressure by the SphygmoCor and Omron devices against the invasive catheter measurement.
    Ding FH; Fan WX; Zhang RY; Zhang Q; Li Y; Wang JG
    Am J Hypertens; 2011 Dec; 24(12):1306-11. PubMed ID: 21976274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of the shapes of the oscillometric pulse amplitude envelopes and their characteristic ratios on the differences between auscultatory and oscillometric blood pressure measurements.
    Amoore JN; Vacher E; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Oct; 12(5):297-305. PubMed ID: 17890968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validity and reliability of central blood pressure estimated by upper arm oscillometric cuff pressure.
    Climie RE; Schultz MG; Nikolic SB; Ahuja KD; Fell JW; Sharman JE
    Am J Hypertens; 2012 Apr; 25(4):414-20. PubMed ID: 22223041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Oscillometric blood pressure measurements: differences between measured and calculated mean arterial pressure.
    Kiers HD; Hofstra JM; Wetzels JF
    Neth J Med; 2008 Dec; 66(11):474-9. PubMed ID: 19075313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How important is the recommended slow cuff pressure deflation rate for blood pressure measurement?
    Zheng D; Amoore JN; Mieke S; Murray A
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2011 Oct; 39(10):2584-91. PubMed ID: 21735319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Automatic blood pressure measurement: the oscillometric waveform shape is a potential contributor to differences between oscillometric and auscultatory pressure measurements.
    Amoore JN; Lemesre Y; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
    J Hypertens; 2008 Jan; 26(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 18090538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of the Microlife large-extra large-sized cuff (32-52 cm) coupled to an automatic oscillometric device.
    Masiero S; Saladini F; Benetti E; Palatini P
    Blood Press Monit; 2011 Apr; 16(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 21346560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.