These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23547036)
41. The impact of pulse pressure on the accuracy of wrist blood pressure measurement. Westhoff TH; Schmidt S; Meissner R; Zidek W; van der Giet M J Hum Hypertens; 2009 Jun; 23(6):391-5. PubMed ID: 19092843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Repeatability of SphygmoCor pulse wave analysis in assessing arterial wave reflection in pregnancy using applanation tonometry. Crilly MA; Orme KM; Henderson J; Allan AJ; Bhattacharya S Hypertens Pregnancy; 2014 Aug; 33(3):322-32. PubMed ID: 24475771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Intra-arterial versus oscillometric blood pressure measurements in women with severe peripartum hypertension undergoing urgent treatment with nicardipine: An observational study. Zhang Y; Lan L; Qi H; Qin J; Ren L; Li L; Yan Y; Gan S; Xiang B Pregnancy Hypertens; 2021 Jun; 24():100-106. PubMed ID: 33773326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Comparison of intra-arterial and automated oscillometric blood pressure measurement methods in postoperative hypertensive patients. Loubser PG Med Instrum; 1986; 20(5):255-9. PubMed ID: 3784934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Replacing the mercury manometer with an oscillometric device in a hypertension clinic: implications for clinical decision making. Stergiou GS; Lourida P; Tzamouranis D J Hum Hypertens; 2011 Nov; 25(11):692-8. PubMed ID: 21107434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Comparison between oscillometric and invasive blood pressure measurements in critically ill premature infants. Takci S; Yigit S; Korkmaz A; Yurdakök M Acta Paediatr; 2012 Feb; 101(2):132-5. PubMed ID: 21880068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Measurement of central systolic blood pressure by pulse volume plethysmography with a noninvasive blood pressure monitor. Sung SH; Cheng HM; Chuang SY; Shih YT; Wang KL; Chen YH; Lin SJ; Yu WC; Chen CH Am J Hypertens; 2012 May; 25(5):542-8. PubMed ID: 22278210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Korotkoff sound versus oscillometric cuff sphygmomanometers: comparison between auscultatory and DynaPulse blood pressure measurements. Chio SS; Urbina EM; Lapointe J; Tsai J; Berenson GS J Am Soc Hypertens; 2011; 5(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 21269907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Discarding the first of three nurse-auscultatory or oscillometric blood pressure measurements does not improve the association of office blood pressure with ABPM. Graves JW; Grossardt BR Blood Press Monit; 2010 Jun; 15(3):146-51. PubMed ID: 20407368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. The impact of calibration approaches on the accuracy of oscillometric central aortic blood pressure measurement. Gotzmann M; Hogeweg M; Bauer F; Seibert FS; Rohn BJ; Mügge A; Babel N; Westhoff TH J Hypertens; 2020 Nov; 38(11):2154-2160. PubMed ID: 32649641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Similarity between blood pressure values assessed by auscultatory method with mercury sphygmomanometer and automated oscillometric digital device. Pavan MV; Saura GE; Korkes HA; Nascimento KM; Madeira Neto ND; Dávila R; Rodrigues CI; Almeida FA J Bras Nefrol; 2012 Mar; 34(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 22441181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Estimation of mean arterial pressure from the oscillometric cuff pressure: comparison of different techniques. Zheng D; Amoore JN; Mieke S; Murray A Med Biol Eng Comput; 2011 Jan; 49(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 21042950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Noninvasive monitoring of blood pressure in the critically ill: reliability according to the cuff site (arm, thigh, or ankle). Lakhal K; Macq C; Ehrmann S; Boulain T; Capdevila X Crit Care Med; 2012 Apr; 40(4):1207-13. PubMed ID: 22425818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Evaluation of an indirect oscillometric blood pressure monitor in normotensive and hypotensive anesthetized dogs. Shih A; Robertson S; Vigani A; da Cunha A; Pablo L; Bandt C J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio); 2010 Jun; 20(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 20636984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Importance of Calibration Method in Central Blood Pressure for Cardiac Structural Abnormalities. Negishi K; Yang H; Wang Y; Nolan MT; Negishi T; Pathan F; Marwick TH; Sharman JE Am J Hypertens; 2016 Sep; 29(9):1070-6. PubMed ID: 27085076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Validation Study to Determine the Accuracy of Central Blood Pressure Measurement Using the Sphygmocor Xcel Cuff Device. Schultz MG; Picone DS; Armstrong MK; Black JA; Dwyer N; Roberts-Thomson P; Sharman JE Hypertension; 2020 Jul; 76(1):244-250. PubMed ID: 32475318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Characteristic Ratio-Independent Arterial Stiffness-Based Blood Pressure Estimation. Baktash S; Forouzanfar M; Batkin I; Bolic M; Groza VZ; Ahmad S; Dajani HR IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2017 Sep; 21(5):1263-1270. PubMed ID: 27479981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Oscillometric and intra-arterial blood pressure in preterm and term infants: extent of discrepancy and factors associated with inaccuracy. Shimokaze T; Akaba K; Saito E Am J Perinatol; 2015 Feb; 32(3):277-82. PubMed ID: 24971570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Automated device that complies with current guidelines for office blood pressure measurement: design and pilot application study of the Microlife WatchBP Office device. Stergiou GS; Lin CW; Lin CM; Chang SL; Protogerou AD; Tzamouranis D; Nasothimiou E; Tan TM Blood Press Monit; 2008 Aug; 13(4):231-5. PubMed ID: 18635980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]