BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

606 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23548263)

  • 1. Web 2.0-based crowdsourcing for high-quality gold standard development in clinical natural language processing.
    Zhai H; Lingren T; Deleger L; Li Q; Kaiser M; Stoutenborough L; Solti I
    J Med Internet Res; 2013 Apr; 15(4):e73. PubMed ID: 23548263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Microtask crowdsourcing for disease mention annotation in PubMed abstracts.
    Good BM; Nanis M; Wu C; Su AI
    Pac Symp Biocomput; 2015; ():282-93. PubMed ID: 25592589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Crowdsourcing image annotation for nucleus detection and segmentation in computational pathology: evaluating experts, automated methods, and the crowd.
    Irshad H; Montaser-Kouhsari L; Waltz G; Bucur O; Nowak JA; Dong F; Knoblauch NW; Beck AH
    Pac Symp Biocomput; 2015; ():294-305. PubMed ID: 25592590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. User-centered design of a web-based crowdsourcing-integrated semantic text annotation tool for building a mental health knowledge base.
    He X; Zhang H; Bian J
    J Biomed Inform; 2020 Oct; 110():103571. PubMed ID: 32961307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating the impact of pre-annotation on annotation speed and potential bias: natural language processing gold standard development for clinical named entity recognition in clinical trial announcements.
    Lingren T; Deleger L; Molnar K; Zhai H; Meinzen-Derr J; Kaiser M; Stoutenborough L; Li Q; Solti I
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2014; 21(3):406-13. PubMed ID: 24001514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validity of Online Screening for Autism: Crowdsourcing Study Comparing Paid and Unpaid Diagnostic Tasks.
    Washington P; Kalantarian H; Tariq Q; Schwartz J; Dunlap K; Chrisman B; Varma M; Ning M; Kline A; Stockham N; Paskov K; Voss C; Haber N; Wall DP
    J Med Internet Res; 2019 May; 21(5):e13668. PubMed ID: 31124463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Crowdsourcing Twitter annotations to identify first-hand experiences of prescription drug use.
    Alvaro N; Conway M; Doan S; Lofi C; Overington J; Collier N
    J Biomed Inform; 2015 Dec; 58():280-287. PubMed ID: 26556646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Boosting drug named entity recognition using an aggregate classifier.
    Korkontzelos I; Piliouras D; Dowsey AW; Ananiadou S
    Artif Intell Med; 2015 Oct; 65(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 26116947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. SemClinBr - a multi-institutional and multi-specialty semantically annotated corpus for Portuguese clinical NLP tasks.
    Oliveira LESE; Peters AC; da Silva AMP; Gebeluca CP; Gumiel YB; Cintho LMM; Carvalho DR; Al Hasan S; Moro CMC
    J Biomed Semantics; 2022 May; 13(1):13. PubMed ID: 35527259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A hybrid approach toward biomedical relation extraction training corpora: combining distant supervision with crowdsourcing.
    Sousa D; Lamurias A; Couto FM
    Database (Oxford); 2020 Dec; 2020():. PubMed ID: 33258966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Standardizing Heterogeneous Annotation Corpora Using HL7 FHIR for Facilitating their Reuse and Integration in Clinical NLP.
    Hong N; Wen A; Mojarad MR; Sohn S; Liu H; Jiang G
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2018; 2018():574-583. PubMed ID: 30815098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Building gold standard corpora for medical natural language processing tasks.
    Deleger L; Li Q; Lingren T; Kaiser M; Molnar K; Stoutenborough L; Kouril M; Marsolo K; Solti I
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2012; 2012():144-53. PubMed ID: 23304283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A study of active learning methods for named entity recognition in clinical text.
    Chen Y; Lasko TA; Mei Q; Denny JC; Xu H
    J Biomed Inform; 2015 Dec; 58():11-18. PubMed ID: 26385377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mapping of Crowdsourcing in Health: Systematic Review.
    Créquit P; Mansouri G; Benchoufi M; Vivot A; Ravaud P
    J Med Internet Res; 2018 May; 20(5):e187. PubMed ID: 29764795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Crowdsourcing for Machine Learning in Public Health Surveillance: Lessons Learned From Amazon Mechanical Turk.
    Shakeri Hossein Abad Z; Butler GP; Thompson W; Lee J
    J Med Internet Res; 2022 Jan; 24(1):e28749. PubMed ID: 35040794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Crowd control: Effectively utilizing unscreened crowd workers for biomedical data annotation.
    Cocos A; Qian T; Callison-Burch C; Masino AJ
    J Biomed Inform; 2017 May; 69():86-92. PubMed ID: 28389234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. RysannMD: A biomedical semantic annotator balancing speed and accuracy.
    Cuzzola J; Jovanović J; Bagheri E
    J Biomed Inform; 2017 Jul; 71():91-109. PubMed ID: 28552401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Crowdsourcing citation-screening in a mixed-studies systematic review: a feasibility study.
    Noel-Storr AH; Redmond P; Lamé G; Liberati E; Kelly S; Miller L; Dooley G; Paterson A; Burt J
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Apr; 21(1):88. PubMed ID: 33906604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. NCBI disease corpus: a resource for disease name recognition and concept normalization.
    Doğan RI; Leaman R; Lu Z
    J Biomed Inform; 2014 Feb; 47():1-10. PubMed ID: 24393765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Crowdsourcing the Citation Screening Process for Systematic Reviews: Validation Study.
    Nama N; Sampson M; Barrowman N; Sandarage R; Menon K; Macartney G; Murto K; Vaccani JP; Katz S; Zemek R; Nasr A; McNally JD
    J Med Internet Res; 2019 Apr; 21(4):e12953. PubMed ID: 31033444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 31.