BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23548452)

  • 1. A comparison of lateral ankle ligament suture anchor strength.
    Barber FA; Herbert MA; Crates JM
    Foot Ankle Surg; 2013 Jun; 19(2):108-11. PubMed ID: 23548452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cyclic loading biomechanical analysis of the pullout strengths of rotator cuff and glenoid anchors: 2013 update.
    Barber FA; Herbert MA
    Arthroscopy; 2013 May; 29(5):832-44. PubMed ID: 23561482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cyclic biomechanical testing of biocomposite lateral row knotless anchors in a human cadaveric model.
    Barber FA; Bava ED; Spenciner DB; Piccirillo J
    Arthroscopy; 2013 Jun; 29(6):1012-8. PubMed ID: 23578366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cyclic load testing and ultimate failure strength of suture anchors in the acetabular rim.
    Ruiz-Suarez M; Aziz-Jacobo J; Barber FA
    Arthroscopy; 2010 Jun; 26(6):762-8. PubMed ID: 20511034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Anatomic suture anchor versus the Broström technique for anterior talofibular ligament repair: a biomechanical comparison.
    Waldrop NE; Wijdicks CA; Jansson KS; LaPrade RF; Clanton TO
    Am J Sports Med; 2012 Nov; 40(11):2590-6. PubMed ID: 22962291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanical comparison of tibial eminence fracture fixation with high-strength suture, EndoButton, and suture anchor.
    Hapa O; Barber FA; Süner G; Özden R; Davul S; Bozdağ E; Sünbüloğlu E
    Arthroscopy; 2012 May; 28(5):681-7. PubMed ID: 22284410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cyclic loading of rotator cuff reconstructions: single-row repair with modified suture configurations versus double-row repair.
    Lorbach O; Bachelier F; Vees J; Kohn D; Pape D
    Am J Sports Med; 2008 Aug; 36(8):1504-10. PubMed ID: 18296541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical comparison of knotless anchor repair versus simple suture repair for type II SLAP lesions.
    Uggen C; Wei A; Glousman RE; ElAttrache N; Tibone JE; McGarry MH; Lee TQ
    Arthroscopy; 2009 Oct; 25(10):1085-92. PubMed ID: 19801286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical analysis of suture bridge fixation for tibial eminence fractures.
    Sawyer GA; Anderson BC; Paller D; Schiller J; Eberson CP; Hulstyn M
    Arthroscopy; 2012 Oct; 28(10):1533-9. PubMed ID: 22607830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Knotless Anchors in Acetabular Labral Repair: A Biomechanical Comparison.
    Safran MR; Behn AW; Botser IB; Mardones R
    Arthroscopy; 2019 Jan; 35(1):70-76.e1. PubMed ID: 30473457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cyclic load testing and ultimate failure strength of biodegradable glenoid anchors.
    Barber FA; Coons DA; Ruiz-Suarez M
    Arthroscopy; 2008 Feb; 24(2):224-8. PubMed ID: 18237708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomechanical comparison of an all-soft suture anchor with a modified Broström-Gould suture repair for lateral ligament reconstruction.
    Brown CA; Hurwit D; Behn A; Hunt KJ
    Am J Sports Med; 2014 Feb; 42(2):417-22. PubMed ID: 24401683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. All-Suture Anchors: Biomechanical Analysis of Pullout Strength, Displacement, and Failure Mode.
    Barber FA; Herbert MA
    Arthroscopy; 2017 Jun; 33(6):1113-1121. PubMed ID: 28017468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biomechanical Analysis of an Arthroscopic Broström Ankle Ligament Repair and a Suture Anchor-Augmented Repair.
    Giza E; Whitlow SR; Williams BT; Acevedo JI; Mangone PG; Haytmanek CT; Curry EE; Turnbull TL; LaPrade RF; Wijdicks CA; Clanton TO
    Foot Ankle Int; 2015 Jul; 36(7):836-41. PubMed ID: 25767195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Suture slippage in knotless suture anchors as a potential failure mechanism in rotator cuff repair.
    Wieser K; Farshad M; Vlachopoulos L; Ruffieux K; Gerber C; Meyer DC
    Arthroscopy; 2012 Nov; 28(11):1622-7. PubMed ID: 22981366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cyclic load testing of biodegradable suture anchors containing 2 high-strength sutures.
    Barber FA; Coons DA; Ruiz-Suarez M
    Arthroscopy; 2007 Apr; 23(4):355-60. PubMed ID: 17418326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical advantages of triple-loaded suture anchors compared with double-row rotator cuff repairs.
    Barber FA; Herbert MA; Schroeder FA; Aziz-Jacobo J; Mays MM; Rapley JH
    Arthroscopy; 2010 Mar; 26(3):316-23. PubMed ID: 20206040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vitro comparison of standard and Knotless metal suture anchors.
    Zumstein M; Jacob HA; Schneeberger AG
    Arthroscopy; 2004 May; 20(5):517-20. PubMed ID: 15122142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanical comparison of a knotless suture anchor with standard suture anchor in the repair of type II SLAP tears.
    Sileo MJ; Lee SJ; Kremenic IJ; Orishimo K; Ben-Avi S; McHugh M; Nicholas SJ
    Arthroscopy; 2009 Apr; 25(4):348-54. PubMed ID: 19341920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The 2.5 mm PushLock suture anchor system versus a traditional suture anchor for ulnar collateral ligament injuries of the thumb: a biomechanical study.
    Jarrett CD; McGillivary GR; Hutton WC
    J Hand Surg Eur Vol; 2010 Feb; 35(2):139-43. PubMed ID: 19828569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.