156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23548696)
1. Experimental designs for array comparative genomic hybridization technology.
McDonnell SK; Riska SM; Klee EW; Thorland EC; Kay NE; Thibodeau SN; Parker AS; Eckel-Passow JE
Cytogenet Genome Res; 2013; 139(4):250-7. PubMed ID: 23548696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A GC-wave correction algorithm that improves the analytical performance of aCGH.
Leo A; Walker AM; Lebo MS; Hendrickson B; Scholl T; Akmaev VR
J Mol Diagn; 2012 Nov; 14(6):550-9. PubMed ID: 22922130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Array comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH) for detection of genomic copy number variants.
Ahn JW; Coldwell M; Bint S; Mackie Ogilvie C
J Vis Exp; 2015 Feb; (96):e51718. PubMed ID: 25742425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Array-Based Comparative Genomic Hybridization (aCGH).
Zhang C; Cerveira E; Romanovitch M; Zhu Q
Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1541():167-179. PubMed ID: 27910023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reference-unbiased copy number variant analysis using CGH microarrays.
Ju YS; Hong D; Kim S; Park SS; Kim S; Lee S; Park H; Kim JI; Seo JS
Nucleic Acids Res; 2010 Nov; 38(20):e190. PubMed ID: 20802225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Centralization errors in comparative genomic hybridization array analysis of pituitary tumor samples.
Lasolle H; Alix E; Bonnefille C; Elsensohn MH; Michel J; Sanlaville D; Roy P; Raverot G; Bardel C
Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2018 Jun; 57(6):320-328. PubMed ID: 29460398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Single-cell copy number variation detection.
Cheng J; Vanneste E; Konings P; Voet T; Vermeesch JR; Moreau Y
Genome Biol; 2011 Aug; 12(8):R80. PubMed ID: 21854607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Microarray Techniques to Analyze Copy-Number Alterations in Genomic DNA: Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization and Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism Array.
Szuhai K; Vermeer M
J Invest Dermatol; 2015 Oct; 135(10):e37. PubMed ID: 26358390
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Array comparative genomic hybridisation testing in CHD.
Hightower HB; Robin NH; Mikhail FM; Ambalavanan N
Cardiol Young; 2015 Aug; 25(6):1155-72. PubMed ID: 25296170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Array-based comparative genomic hybridization as a tool for analyzing the leukemia genome.
Strefford JC; Parker H
Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 538():151-77. PubMed ID: 19277573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Stationary wavelet packet transform and dependent laplacian bivariate shrinkage estimator for array-CGH data smoothing.
Nguyen N; Huang H; Oraintara S; Vo A
J Comput Biol; 2010 Feb; 17(2):139-52. PubMed ID: 20078226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comprehensive performance comparison of high-resolution array platforms for genome-wide Copy Number Variation (CNV) analysis in humans.
Haraksingh RR; Abyzov A; Urban AE
BMC Genomics; 2017 Apr; 18(1):321. PubMed ID: 28438122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative genomic hybridization to detect variation in the copy number of large DNA segments.
Holcomb IN; Trask BJ
Cold Spring Harb Protoc; 2011 Nov; 2011(11):1323-33. PubMed ID: 22046040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Defining the impact of maternal cell contamination on the interpretation of prenatal microarray analysis.
Lamb AN; Rosenfeld JA; Coppinger J; Dodge ET; Dabell MP; Torchia BS; Ravnan JB; Shaffer LG; Ballif BC
Genet Med; 2012 Nov; 14(11):914-21. PubMed ID: 22766610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The value of microarray-based comparative genomic hybridisation (aCGH) testing in the paediatric clinic.
Briggs TA; Harris J; Innes J; Will A; Arkwright PD; Clayton-Smith J
Arch Dis Child; 2015 Aug; 100(8):728-31. PubMed ID: 25809346
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Incidental detection of cancer predisposition gene copy number variations by array comparative genomic hybridization.
Hamm JA; Mikhail FM; Hollenbeck D; Farmer M; Robin NH
J Pediatr; 2014 Nov; 165(5):1057-9.e1-4. PubMed ID: 25201531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Current limitations and difficulties in application of microarray comparative genomic hybridization in prenatal diagnosis].
Chen Y; Choy KW
Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 28(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 21287509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Whole-genome sequencing analysis of CNV using low-coverage and paired-end strategies is efficient and outperforms array-based CNV analysis.
Zhou B; Ho SS; Zhang X; Pattni R; Haraksingh RR; Urban AE
J Med Genet; 2018 Nov; 55(11):735-743. PubMed ID: 30061371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The genomic basis of disease, mechanisms and assays for genomic disorders.
Stankiewicz P; Lupski JR
Genome Dyn; 2006; 1():1-16. PubMed ID: 18724050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A robust method to analyze copy number alterations of less than 100 kb in single cells using oligonucleotide array CGH.
Möhlendick B; Bartenhagen C; Behrens B; Honisch E; Raba K; Knoefel WT; Stoecklein NH
PLoS One; 2013; 8(6):e67031. PubMed ID: 23825608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
