These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23548696)

  • 1. Experimental designs for array comparative genomic hybridization technology.
    McDonnell SK; Riska SM; Klee EW; Thorland EC; Kay NE; Thibodeau SN; Parker AS; Eckel-Passow JE
    Cytogenet Genome Res; 2013; 139(4):250-7. PubMed ID: 23548696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A GC-wave correction algorithm that improves the analytical performance of aCGH.
    Leo A; Walker AM; Lebo MS; Hendrickson B; Scholl T; Akmaev VR
    J Mol Diagn; 2012 Nov; 14(6):550-9. PubMed ID: 22922130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Array comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH) for detection of genomic copy number variants.
    Ahn JW; Coldwell M; Bint S; Mackie Ogilvie C
    J Vis Exp; 2015 Feb; (96):e51718. PubMed ID: 25742425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Array-Based Comparative Genomic Hybridization (aCGH).
    Zhang C; Cerveira E; Romanovitch M; Zhu Q
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1541():167-179. PubMed ID: 27910023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reference-unbiased copy number variant analysis using CGH microarrays.
    Ju YS; Hong D; Kim S; Park SS; Kim S; Lee S; Park H; Kim JI; Seo JS
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2010 Nov; 38(20):e190. PubMed ID: 20802225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Centralization errors in comparative genomic hybridization array analysis of pituitary tumor samples.
    Lasolle H; Alix E; Bonnefille C; Elsensohn MH; Michel J; Sanlaville D; Roy P; Raverot G; Bardel C
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2018 Jun; 57(6):320-328. PubMed ID: 29460398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Single-cell copy number variation detection.
    Cheng J; Vanneste E; Konings P; Voet T; Vermeesch JR; Moreau Y
    Genome Biol; 2011 Aug; 12(8):R80. PubMed ID: 21854607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Microarray Techniques to Analyze Copy-Number Alterations in Genomic DNA: Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization and Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism Array.
    Szuhai K; Vermeer M
    J Invest Dermatol; 2015 Oct; 135(10):e37. PubMed ID: 26358390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Array comparative genomic hybridisation testing in CHD.
    Hightower HB; Robin NH; Mikhail FM; Ambalavanan N
    Cardiol Young; 2015 Aug; 25(6):1155-72. PubMed ID: 25296170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Array-based comparative genomic hybridization as a tool for analyzing the leukemia genome.
    Strefford JC; Parker H
    Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 538():151-77. PubMed ID: 19277573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stationary wavelet packet transform and dependent laplacian bivariate shrinkage estimator for array-CGH data smoothing.
    Nguyen N; Huang H; Oraintara S; Vo A
    J Comput Biol; 2010 Feb; 17(2):139-52. PubMed ID: 20078226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comprehensive performance comparison of high-resolution array platforms for genome-wide Copy Number Variation (CNV) analysis in humans.
    Haraksingh RR; Abyzov A; Urban AE
    BMC Genomics; 2017 Apr; 18(1):321. PubMed ID: 28438122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative genomic hybridization to detect variation in the copy number of large DNA segments.
    Holcomb IN; Trask BJ
    Cold Spring Harb Protoc; 2011 Nov; 2011(11):1323-33. PubMed ID: 22046040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Defining the impact of maternal cell contamination on the interpretation of prenatal microarray analysis.
    Lamb AN; Rosenfeld JA; Coppinger J; Dodge ET; Dabell MP; Torchia BS; Ravnan JB; Shaffer LG; Ballif BC
    Genet Med; 2012 Nov; 14(11):914-21. PubMed ID: 22766610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The value of microarray-based comparative genomic hybridisation (aCGH) testing in the paediatric clinic.
    Briggs TA; Harris J; Innes J; Will A; Arkwright PD; Clayton-Smith J
    Arch Dis Child; 2015 Aug; 100(8):728-31. PubMed ID: 25809346
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Incidental detection of cancer predisposition gene copy number variations by array comparative genomic hybridization.
    Hamm JA; Mikhail FM; Hollenbeck D; Farmer M; Robin NH
    J Pediatr; 2014 Nov; 165(5):1057-9.e1-4. PubMed ID: 25201531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Current limitations and difficulties in application of microarray comparative genomic hybridization in prenatal diagnosis].
    Chen Y; Choy KW
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 28(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 21287509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Whole-genome sequencing analysis of CNV using low-coverage and paired-end strategies is efficient and outperforms array-based CNV analysis.
    Zhou B; Ho SS; Zhang X; Pattni R; Haraksingh RR; Urban AE
    J Med Genet; 2018 Nov; 55(11):735-743. PubMed ID: 30061371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The genomic basis of disease, mechanisms and assays for genomic disorders.
    Stankiewicz P; Lupski JR
    Genome Dyn; 2006; 1():1-16. PubMed ID: 18724050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A robust method to analyze copy number alterations of less than 100 kb in single cells using oligonucleotide array CGH.
    Möhlendick B; Bartenhagen C; Behrens B; Honisch E; Raba K; Knoefel WT; Stoecklein NH
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(6):e67031. PubMed ID: 23825608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.