These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Arterial waveform analysis in anesthesia and critical care. Montenij LJ; de Waal EE; Buhre WF Curr Opin Anaesthesiol; 2011 Dec; 24(6):651-6. PubMed ID: 22036950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of variable arterial transducer level on the accuracy of pulse contour waveform-derived measurements in critically ill patients. He HW; Liu DW; Long Y; Wang XT; Zhao ML; Lai XL J Clin Monit Comput; 2016 Oct; 30(5):569-75. PubMed ID: 26298710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Functional haemodynamic monitoring: The value of SVV as measured by the LiDCORapid™ in predicting fluid responsiveness in high risk vascular surgical patients. Willars C; Dada A; Hughes T; Green D Int J Surg; 2012; 10(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 22330275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Systematic review of uncalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis to determine cardiac output and stroke volume variation. Slagt C; Malagon I; Groeneveld AB Br J Anaesth; 2014 Apr; 112(4):626-37. PubMed ID: 24431387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. FloTrac® monitoring system: what are its uses in critically ill medical patients? Argueta E; Berdine G; Pena C; Nugent KM Am J Med Sci; 2015 Apr; 349(4):352-6. PubMed ID: 25584624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The role of invasive techniques in cardiopulmonary evaluation. De Backer D; Fagnoul D; Herpain A Curr Opin Crit Care; 2013 Jun; 19(3):228-33. PubMed ID: 23519080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Hofer CK; Müller SM; Furrer L; Klaghofer R; Genoni M; Zollinger A Chest; 2005 Aug; 128(2):848-54. PubMed ID: 16100177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hemodynamic monitoring by transpulmonary thermodilution and pulse contour analysis in critically ill children. Proulx F; Lemson J; Choker G; Tibby SM Pediatr Crit Care Med; 2011 Jul; 12(4):459-66. PubMed ID: 21263372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of changes in blood pressure and airway pressures on parameters of fluid responsiveness. Sakka SG; Becher L; Kozieras J; van Hout N Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2009 Apr; 26(4):322-7. PubMed ID: 19401662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predicting fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients by using 3 dynamic indices: is it all equally effective? Wacharasint P; Lertamornpong A; Wattanathum A; Wongsa A J Med Assoc Thai; 2012 May; 95 Suppl 5():S149-56. PubMed ID: 22934461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Calibrated versus uncalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis in monitoring cardiac output with transpulmonary thermodilution in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock: an observational study. Slagt C; Helmi M; Malagon I; Groeneveld AB Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2015 Jan; 32(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 25387298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]