These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23549299)

  • 1. Haemodynamic monitoring using arterial waveform analysis.
    Chew MS; Åneman A
    Curr Opin Crit Care; 2013 Jun; 19(3):234-41. PubMed ID: 23549299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Arterial waveform analysis in anesthesia and critical care.
    Montenij LJ; de Waal EE; Buhre WF
    Curr Opin Anaesthesiol; 2011 Dec; 24(6):651-6. PubMed ID: 22036950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of variable arterial transducer level on the accuracy of pulse contour waveform-derived measurements in critically ill patients.
    He HW; Liu DW; Long Y; Wang XT; Zhao ML; Lai XL
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2016 Oct; 30(5):569-75. PubMed ID: 26298710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Functional haemodynamic monitoring: The value of SVV as measured by the LiDCORapid™ in predicting fluid responsiveness in high risk vascular surgical patients.
    Willars C; Dada A; Hughes T; Green D
    Int J Surg; 2012; 10(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 22330275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Systematic review of uncalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis to determine cardiac output and stroke volume variation.
    Slagt C; Malagon I; Groeneveld AB
    Br J Anaesth; 2014 Apr; 112(4):626-37. PubMed ID: 24431387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Heart lung interactions during mechanical ventilation.
    Pinsky MR
    Curr Opin Crit Care; 2012 Jun; 18(3):256-60. PubMed ID: 22473256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of stroke volume variation compared with pleth variability index to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients undergoing major surgery.
    Zimmermann M; Feibicke T; Keyl C; Prasser C; Moritz S; Graf BM; Wiesenack C
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Jun; 27(6):555-61. PubMed ID: 20035228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dynamic preload indicators fail to predict fluid responsiveness in open-chest conditions.
    de Waal EE; Rex S; Kruitwagen CL; Kalkman CJ; Buhre WF
    Crit Care Med; 2009 Feb; 37(2):510-5. PubMed ID: 19114886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Applicability of stroke volume variation in patients of a general intensive care unit: a longitudinal observational study.
    Mair S; Tschirdewahn J; Götz S; Frank J; Phillip V; Henschel B; Schultheiss C; Mayr U; Noe S; Treiber M; Schmid RM; Saugel B; Huber W
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2017 Dec; 31(6):1177-1187. PubMed ID: 27817009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The ability of PiCCO versus LiDCO variables to detect changes in cardiac index: a prospective clinical study.
    Donati A; Nardella R; Gabbanelli V; Scarcella M; Romanelli M; Romagnoli L; Botticelli L; Pantanetti S; Pelaia P
    Minerva Anestesiol; 2008; 74(7-8):367-74. PubMed ID: 18414371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Limitations of arterial pulse pressure variation and left ventricular stroke volume variation in estimating cardiac pre-load during open heart surgery.
    Rex S; Schälte G; Schroth S; de Waal EE; Metzelder S; Overbeck Y; Rossaint R; Buhre W
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2007 Oct; 51(9):1258-67. PubMed ID: 17714575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Arterial pulse pressure variation predicting fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients.
    Auler JO; Galas FR; Sundin MR; Hajjar LA
    Shock; 2008 Oct; 30 Suppl 1():18-22. PubMed ID: 18704014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. FloTrac® monitoring system: what are its uses in critically ill medical patients?
    Argueta E; Berdine G; Pena C; Nugent KM
    Am J Med Sci; 2015 Apr; 349(4):352-6. PubMed ID: 25584624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of invasive techniques in cardiopulmonary evaluation.
    De Backer D; Fagnoul D; Herpain A
    Curr Opin Crit Care; 2013 Jun; 19(3):228-33. PubMed ID: 23519080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.
    Hofer CK; Müller SM; Furrer L; Klaghofer R; Genoni M; Zollinger A
    Chest; 2005 Aug; 128(2):848-54. PubMed ID: 16100177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hemodynamic monitoring by transpulmonary thermodilution and pulse contour analysis in critically ill children.
    Proulx F; Lemson J; Choker G; Tibby SM
    Pediatr Crit Care Med; 2011 Jul; 12(4):459-66. PubMed ID: 21263372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of changes in blood pressure and airway pressures on parameters of fluid responsiveness.
    Sakka SG; Becher L; Kozieras J; van Hout N
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2009 Apr; 26(4):322-7. PubMed ID: 19401662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predicting fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients by using 3 dynamic indices: is it all equally effective?
    Wacharasint P; Lertamornpong A; Wattanathum A; Wongsa A
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2012 May; 95 Suppl 5():S149-56. PubMed ID: 22934461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Invasive measures of left ventricular preload.
    Monnet X; Teboul JL
    Curr Opin Crit Care; 2006 Jun; 12(3):235-40. PubMed ID: 16672783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Calibrated versus uncalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis in monitoring cardiac output with transpulmonary thermodilution in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock: an observational study.
    Slagt C; Helmi M; Malagon I; Groeneveld AB
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2015 Jan; 32(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 25387298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.