These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23549490)
1. Magnetic navigation system and CT roadmap-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention: a comparison to the conventional approach. Hao R; Zhang Q; Xu Z; Tang L; Yang Z; Cao K; Li C J Invasive Cardiol; 2013 Apr; 25(4):177-81. PubMed ID: 23549490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Initial experience of percutaneous coronary intervention guided by computed tomography coronary angiography derived roadmap and magnetic navigation system]. Zhang Q; Kong DY; Li CJ; Chen B; Jia EZ; Chen LL; Jia QZ; Dai ZH; Zhu TT; Chen J; Liu J; Zhu TB; Yang ZJ; Cao KJ Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi; 2013 Feb; 41(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 23710740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Integration of dual source computed tomography with magnetic navigation system for percutaneous coronary intervention: a feasibility study. Li C; Tang L; Yang Z; Cao K Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Dec; 78(7):1108-15. PubMed ID: 21538793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A randomized comparison of the magnetic navigation system versus conventional percutaneous coronary intervention. Ramcharitar S; van Geuns RJ; Patterson M; van der Giessen WJ; van der Ent M; van Domburg RT; Serruys PW Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2008 Nov; 72(6):761-70. PubMed ID: 18798236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Integration of multislice computed tomography with magnetic navigation facilitates percutaneous coronary interventions without additional contrast agents. Ramcharitar S; Pugliese F; Schultz C; Ligthart J; de Feyter P; Li H; Mollet N; van de Ent M; Serruys PW; van Geuns RJ J Am Coll Cardiol; 2009 Mar; 53(9):741-6. PubMed ID: 19245963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Clinical study on the coronary artery interventions guided by the magnetic navigation system]. Li CJ; Wang H; Wang LS; Zhu TB; Yang ZJ; Cao KJ Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi; 2010 Mar; 38(3):243-7. PubMed ID: 20450567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The feasibility and safety of applying the Magnetic Navigation System to manage chronically occluded vessels: a single centre experience. Ramcharitar S; van der Giessen WJ; van der Ent M; de Feyter P; Serruys PW; van Geuns RJ EuroIntervention; 2011 Jan; 6(6):711-6. PubMed ID: 21205593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Randomized comparison of the magnetic navigation system vs. standard wires in the treatment of bifurcations. Ramcharitar S; van der Giessen WJ; van der Ent M; Serruys PW; van Geuns RJ Eur Heart J; 2011 Jun; 32(12):1479-83. PubMed ID: 20439262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Magnetic navigation system assisted percutaneous coronary intervention: a comparison to the conventional approach in daily practice. Li CJ; Wang H; Yang ZJ; Cao KJ Chin Med J (Engl); 2011 Jan; 124(2):233-6. PubMed ID: 21362372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of magnetically navigated and conventional wire percutaneous coronary intervention of a single discrete stenosis. Patterson MS; van Nooijen F; Ijsselmuiden A; Dirksen M; Van Domburg R; Serruys P; Kiemeneij F Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Nov; 74(5):693-9. PubMed ID: 19496121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Initial experience with a magnetic navigation system for invasive treatment in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. Wang H; Li C; Wang L; Yang Z; Cao K J Interv Cardiol; 2011 Dec; 24(6):549-54. PubMed ID: 21883473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention by magnetic navigation compared with conventional wire technique. Patterson MS; Dirksen MT; Ijsselmuiden AJ; Amoroso G; Slagboom T; Laarman GJ; Schultz C; van Domburg RT; Serruys PW; Kiemeneij F Eur Heart J; 2011 Jun; 32(12):1472-8. PubMed ID: 20051425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Guidewire navigation in coronary artery stenoses using a novel magnetic navigation system: first clinical experience. Tsuchida K; García-García HM; van der Giessen WJ; McFadden EP; van der Ent M; Sianos G; Meulenbrug H; Ong AT; Serruys PW Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2006 Mar; 67(3):356-63. PubMed ID: 16489562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Magnetic navigation system for percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis. Qi Z; Wu B; Luo X; Zhu J; Shi H; Jin B Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Jul; 95(29):e4216. PubMed ID: 27442645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Initial experience with a magnetic navigation system for percutaneous coronary intervention in complex coronary artery lesions. Atmakuri SR; Lev EI; Alviar C; Ibarra E; Raizner AE; Solomon SL; Kleiman NS J Am Coll Cardiol; 2006 Feb; 47(3):515-21. PubMed ID: 16458129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robotic-Enhanced PCI Compared to the Traditional Manual Approach. Smilowitz NR; Moses JW; Sosa FA; Lerman B; Qureshi Y; Dalton KE; Privitera LT; Canone-Weber D; Singh V; Leon MB; Weisz G J Invasive Cardiol; 2014 Jul; 26(7):318-21. PubMed ID: 24993988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Magnetically navigated percutaneous coronary intervention in distal and/or complex lesions may improve procedural outcome and material consumption. IJsselmuiden AJ; Patterson MS; van Nooijen FC; Tangelder GJ; Dirksen MT; Amoroso G; Slagboom T; Serruys PW; Laarman GJ; Kiemeneij F EuroIntervention; 2009 Jan; 4(4):517-23. PubMed ID: 19284075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of multislice computed tomography to estimate difficulty in wire crossing in percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion. Ehara M; Terashima M; Kawai M; Matsushita S; Tsuchikane E; Kinoshita Y; Kimura M; Nasu K; Tanaka N; Fujita H; Habara M; Ito T; Rathore S; Katoh O; Suzuki T J Invasive Cardiol; 2009 Nov; 21(11):575-82. PubMed ID: 19901411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]