387 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23549771)
1. Biologic meshes are not superior to synthetic meshes in ventral hernia repair: an experimental study with long-term follow-up evaluation.
Ditzel M; Deerenberg EB; Grotenhuis N; Harlaar JJ; Monkhorst K; Bastiaansen-Jenniskens YM; Jeekel J; Lange JF
Surg Endosc; 2013 Oct; 27(10):3654-62. PubMed ID: 23549771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Non-Cross-Linked Collagen Mesh Performs Best in a Physiologic, Noncontaminated Rat Model.
Kaufmann R; Jairam AP; Mulder IM; Wu Z; Verhelst J; Vennix S; Giesen LJX; Clahsen-van Groningen MC; Jeekel J; Lange JF
Surg Innov; 2019 Jun; 26(3):302-311. PubMed ID: 30834819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Coated meshes for hernia repair provide comparable intraperitoneal adhesion prevention.
Schreinemacher MH; van Barneveld KW; Dikmans RE; Gijbels MJ; Greve JW; Bouvy ND
Surg Endosc; 2013 Nov; 27(11):4202-9. PubMed ID: 23749270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of new prosthetic meshes for ventral hernia repair.
Burger JW; Halm JA; Wijsmuller AR; ten Raa S; Jeekel J
Surg Endosc; 2006 Aug; 20(8):1320-5. PubMed ID: 16865616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [The repair of abdominal defects in rabbits with Parietex and Surgisis meshes abdominal wall].
Baroncello JB; Czeczko NG; Malafaia O; Ribas-Filho JM; Nassif PA; Dietz AU
Arq Gastroenterol; 2008; 45(4):323-9. PubMed ID: 19148362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Characteristics of different mesh types for abdominal wall repair in an experimental model of peritonitis.
Kaufmann R; Jairam AP; Mulder IM; Wu Z; Verhelst J; Vennix S; Giesen LJX; Clahsen-van Groningen MC; Jeekel J; Lange JF
Br J Surg; 2017 Dec; 104(13):1884-1893. PubMed ID: 28901533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative study of Polypropylene versus Parietex composite®, Vicryl® and Ultrapro® meshes, regarding the formation of intraperitoneal adhesions.
Biondo-Simões ML; Carvalho LB; Conceição LT; Santos KB; Schiel WA; Arantes M; Silveira TD; Magri JC; Gomes FF
Acta Cir Bras; 2017 Feb; 32(2):98-107. PubMed ID: 28300876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Adhesion prevention in ventral hernia repair: an experimental study comparing three lightweight porous meshes recommended for intraperitoneal use.
D'Amore L; Ceci F; Mattia S; Fabbi M; Negro P; Gossetti F
Hernia; 2017 Feb; 21(1):115-123. PubMed ID: 27757549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prevention of adhesion to prosthetic mesh: comparison of different barriers using an incisional hernia model.
van 't Riet M; de Vos van Steenwijk PJ; Bonthuis F; Marquet RL; Steyerberg EW; Jeekel J; Bonjer HJ
Ann Surg; 2003 Jan; 237(1):123-8. PubMed ID: 12496539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ultrasound detection of visceral adhesion after intraperitoneal ventral hernia treatment: a comparative study of protected versus unprotected meshes.
Arnaud JP; Hennekinne-Mucci S; Pessaux P; Tuech JJ; Aube C
Hernia; 2003 Jun; 7(2):85-8. PubMed ID: 12820030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Degradation of mesh coatings and intraperitoneal adhesion formation in an experimental model.
Schreinemacher MH; Emans PJ; Gijbels MJ; Greve JW; Beets GL; Bouvy ND
Br J Surg; 2009 Mar; 96(3):305-13. PubMed ID: 19224521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Adhesion Prevention Efficacy of Composite Meshes Parietex
Winny M; Maegel L; Grethe L; Lippmann T; Jonigk D; Schrem H; Kaltenborn A; Klempnauer J; Poehnert D
Int J Med Sci; 2016; 13(12):936-941. PubMed ID: 27994499
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Biologic hernia implants in experimental intraperitoneal onlay mesh plasty repair: the impact of proprietary collagen processing methods and fibrin sealant application on tissue integration.
Petter-Puchner AH; Fortelny RH; Silic K; Brand J; Gruber-Blum S; Redl H
Surg Endosc; 2011 Oct; 25(10):3245-52. PubMed ID: 21533522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interposition of the omentum and/or the peritoneum in the emergency repair of large ventral hernias with polypropylene mesh.
Sorour MA
Int J Surg; 2014; 12(6):578-86. PubMed ID: 24793234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adhesions and meshes: synthetic versus bioprosthetic.
Turza KC; Butler CE
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2012 Nov; 130(5 Suppl 2):206S-213S. PubMed ID: 23096974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long term behavior of biological prostheses used as abdominal wall substitutes.
Pascual G; Sotomayor S; Pérez-López P; Buján J; Bellón JM
Histol Histopathol; 2014 Jan; 29(1):139-49. PubMed ID: 23868096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vivo studies comparing the biocompatibility of various polypropylene meshes and their handling properties during endoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) patchplasty: an experimental study in pigs.
Scheidbach H; Tamme C; Tannapfel A; Lippert H; Köckerling F
Surg Endosc; 2004 Feb; 18(2):211-20. PubMed ID: 14691711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Infection susceptibility of crosslinked and non-crosslinked biological meshes in an experimental contaminated environment.
Mulder IM; Deerenberg EB; Bemelman WA; Jeekel J; Lange JF
Am J Surg; 2015 Jul; 210(1):159-66. PubMed ID: 25277544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prevention of adhesion formation to polypropylene mesh by collagen coating: a randomized controlled study in a rat model of ventral hernia repair.
van't Riet M; Burger JW; Bonthuis F; Jeekel J; Bonjer HJ
Surg Endosc; 2004 Apr; 18(4):681-5. PubMed ID: 15026899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-term evaluation of adhesion formation and foreign body response to three new meshes.
Vogels RR; van Barneveld KW; Bosmans JW; Beets G; Gijbels MJ; Schreinemacher MH; Bouvy ND
Surg Endosc; 2015 Aug; 29(8):2251-9. PubMed ID: 25361655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
