These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

69 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2355032)

  • 1. Wagner resurfacing hip arthroplasty. The results of one hundred consecutive arthroplasties after eight to ten years.
    Howie DW; Campbell D; McGee M; Cornish BL
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1990 Jun; 72(5):708-14. PubMed ID: 2355032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Charnley total hip arthroplasty with use of improved techniques of cementing. The results after a minimum of fifteen years of follow-up.
    Madey SM; Callaghan JJ; Olejniczak JP; Goetz DD; Johnston RC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1997 Jan; 79(1):53-64. PubMed ID: 9010186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long-term survival and reason for revision of Wagner resurfacing hip arthroplasty.
    Costi K; Howie DW; Campbell DG; McGee MA; Cornish BL
    J Arthroplasty; 2010 Jun; 25(4):522-8. PubMed ID: 19520546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Minimum ten-year follow-up of cemented total hip replacement in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head.
    Fyda TM; Callaghan JJ; Olejniczak J; Johnston RC
    Iowa Orthop J; 2002; 22():8-19. PubMed ID: 12180617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Total hip arthroplasty with an uncemented tapered femoral component.
    McLaughlin JR; Lee KR
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Jun; 90(6):1290-6. PubMed ID: 18519323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fixation, survival, and dislocation of jumbo acetabular components in revision hip arthroplasty.
    Lachiewicz PF; Soileau ES
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Mar; 95(6):543-8. PubMed ID: 23515989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Conventional versus resurfacing total hip arthroplasty. A long-term prospective study of concomitant bilateral implantation of prostheses.
    Ritter MA; Gioe TJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1986 Feb; 68(2):216-25. PubMed ID: 3944161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [10-year actuarial analysis of a cohort of 156 total hip prostheses of a cemented polished aluminum/polyethylene alloy].
    Le Mouel S; Allain J; Goutallier D
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1998 Jul; 84(4):338-45. PubMed ID: 9775034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cementless total hip arthroplasty in patients fifty years of age or younger: a minimum ten-year follow-up.
    Takenaga RK; Callaghan JJ; Bedard NA; Liu SS; Klaassen AL; Pedersen DR
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Dec; 94(23):2153-9. PubMed ID: 23224386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Total hip arthroplasty with cement and use of a collared matte-finish femoral component: nineteen to twenty-year follow-up.
    Callaghan JJ; Liu SS; Firestone DE; Yehyawi TM; Goetz DD; Sullivan J; Vittetoe DA; O'Rourke MR; Johnston RC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Feb; 90(2):299-306. PubMed ID: 18245589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Early results of conversion of a failed femoral component in hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Ball ST; Le Duff MJ; Amstutz HC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Apr; 89(4):735-41. PubMed ID: 17403794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Uncemented grit-blasted straight tapered titanium stems in patients younger than fifty-five years of age. Fifteen to twenty-year results.
    Aldinger PR; Jung AW; Pritsch M; Breusch S; Thomsen M; Ewerbeck V; Parsch D
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 Jun; 91(6):1432-9. PubMed ID: 19487522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Primary total hip arthroplasty with a flattened press-fit acetabular component in osteoarthritis and inflammatory arthritis: a prospective study on 416 hips with 6-10 years follow-up.
    Zwartelé RE; Olsthoorn PG; Pöll RG; Brand R; Doets HC
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 Dec; 128(12):1379-86. PubMed ID: 18758793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical experience of Ganz surgical dislocation approach for metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.
    Beaulé PE; Shim P; Banga K
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Sep; 24(6 Suppl):127-31. PubMed ID: 19553070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Early failure of the Durom prosthesis in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing in Chinese patients.
    Li J; He C; Li D; Zheng W; Liu D; Xu W
    J Arthroplasty; 2013 Dec; 28(10):1816-21. PubMed ID: 23831082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Functional results of isolated femoral revision of hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Gilbert RE; Cheung G; Carrothers AD; Meyer C; Richardson JB
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Jul; 92(7):1600-4. PubMed ID: 20595565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Durom hip resurfacing system: retrospective study of 644 cases with an average follow-up of 34 months.
    Leclercq S; Lavigne M; Girard J; Chiron P; Vendittoli PA
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2013 May; 99(3):273-9. PubMed ID: 23562709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Wagner surface replacement arthroplasty of the hip. Analysis of fourteen failures in forty-one hips.
    Head WC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1981 Mar; 63(3):420-7. PubMed ID: 7204442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A five-year radiostereometric follow-up of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Itayem R; Arndt A; McMinn DJ; Daniel J; Lundberg A
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 Sep; 89(9):1140-3. PubMed ID: 17905947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. ICLH surface replacement of the hip. An analysis of the first 10 years.
    Freeman MA; Bradley GW
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1983 Aug; 65(4):405-11. PubMed ID: 6409905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.