144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23550505)
1. The views of examiners on the use of intra-oral photographs to detect dental caries in epidemiological studies.
Boye U; Foster GR; Pretty IA; Tickle M
Community Dent Health; 2013 Mar; 30(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 23550505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of caries detection methods using varying numbers of intra-oral digital photographs with visual examination for epidemiology in children.
Boye U; Pretty IA; Tickle M; Walsh T
BMC Oral Health; 2013 Jan; 13():6. PubMed ID: 23312001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of an intra-oral photographic caries assessment with an established visual caries assessment method for use in dental epidemiological studies of children.
Boye U; Willasey A; Walsh T; Tickle M; Pretty IA
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2013 Dec; 41(6):526-33. PubMed ID: 23566100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Children's views on the experience of a visual examination and intra-oral photographs to detect dental caries in epidemiological studies.
Boye U; Foster GR; Pretty IA; Tickle M
Community Dent Health; 2012 Dec; 29(4):284-8. PubMed ID: 23488210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validity of scoring caries and primary molar hypomineralization (DMH) on intraoral photographs.
Elfrink ME; Veerkamp JS; Aartman IH; Moll HA; Ten Cate JM
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2009 Nov; 10 Suppl 1():5-10. PubMed ID: 19863892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of photographic and visual assessment of occlusal caries with histology as the reference standard.
Boye U; Walsh T; Pretty IA; Tickle M
BMC Oral Health; 2012 Apr; 12():10. PubMed ID: 22540771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of the ICDAS system and two fluorescence-based intraoral devices for examination of occlusal surfaces.
Theocharopoulou A; Lagerweij MD; van Strijp AJ
Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2015 Mar; 16(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 25793954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mobile photographic screening for dental caries in children: Diagnostic performance compared to unaided visual dental examination.
Estai M; Kanagasingam Y; Mehdizadeh M; Vignarajan J; Norman R; Huang B; Spallek H; Irving M; Arora A; Kruger E; Tennant M
J Public Health Dent; 2022 Mar; 82(2):166-175. PubMed ID: 33495989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of examiner experience on clinical performance of visual inspection in detecting and assessing the activity status of caries lesions.
Gimenez T; Bittar DG; Piovesan C; Guglielmi CA; Fujimoto KY; Matos R; Novaes TF; Braga MM; Mendes FM
Oper Dent; 2013; 38(6):583-90. PubMed ID: 23617691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Are Carious Lesions in Previously Sealed Occlusal Surfaces Detected as well on Colour Photographs as by Visual Clinical Examination?
Hu X; Fan M; Mulder J; Frencken JE
Oral Health Prev Dent; 2016; 14(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 26870847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Laboratorial training of examiners for using a visual caries detection system in epidemiological surveys.
Piovesan C; Moro BL; Lara JS; Ardenghi TM; Guedes RS; Haddad AE; Braga MM; Mendes FM
BMC Oral Health; 2013 Oct; 13():49. PubMed ID: 24090355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Performance of a fluorescence camera for detection of occlusal caries in vitro.
Jablonski-Momeni A; Schipper HM; Rosen SM; Heinzel-Gutenbrunner M; Roggendorf MJ; Stoll R; Stachniss V; Pieper K
Odontology; 2011 Jan; 99(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 21271327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Registration of dental erosive wear on study models and intra-oral photographs.
Hove LH; Mulic A; Tveit AB; Stenhagen KR; Skaare AB; Espelid I
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2013 Feb; 14(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 23532811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro performance of different methods in detecting occlusal caries lesions.
Gomez J; Zakian C; Salsone S; Pinto SC; Taylor A; Pretty IA; Ellwood R
J Dent; 2013 Feb; 41(2):180-6. PubMed ID: 23146817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparing the outcomes of gold-standard dental examinations with photographic screening by mid-level dental providers.
Park JS; Kruger E; Nicholls W; Estai M; Winters J; Tennant M
Clin Oral Investig; 2019 May; 23(5):2383-2387. PubMed ID: 30302610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dental examiners consistency in applying the ICDAS criteria for a caries prevention community trial.
Nelson S; Eggertsson H; Powell B; Mandelaris J; Ntragatakis M; Richardson T; Ferretti G
Community Dent Health; 2011 Sep; 28(3):238-42. PubMed ID: 21916361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The efficacy of remote screening for dental caries by mid-level dental providers using a mobile teledentistry model.
Estai M; Kanagasingam Y; Huang B; Checker H; Steele L; Kruger E; Tennant M
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2016 Oct; 44(5):435-41. PubMed ID: 27111291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of examiner's clinical experience in detecting occlusal caries lesions in primary teeth.
Bengtson AL; Gomes AC; Mendes FM; Cichello LR; Bengtson NG; Pinheiro SL
Pediatr Dent; 2005; 27(3):238-43. PubMed ID: 16173230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of different magnification levels on visual caries detection with ICDAS.
Neuhaus KW; Jost F; Perrin P; Lussi A
J Dent; 2015 Dec; 43(12):1559-64. PubMed ID: 26366524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Examiner calibration in caries detection for populations and settings where in vivo calibration is not practical.
Christian B; Amezdroz E; Calache H; Gussy M; Sore R; Waters E
Community Dent Health; 2017 Dec; 34(4):248-253. PubMed ID: 29136362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
