144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23550505)
21. Validity and reliability of remote dental screening by different oral health professionals using a store-and-forward telehealth model.
Estai M; Winters J; Kanagasingam Y; Shiikha J; Checker H; Kruger E; Tennant M
Br Dent J; 2016 Oct; 221(7):411-414. PubMed ID: 27713449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. In vitro evaluation of ICDAS and radiographic examination of occlusal surfaces and their association with treatment decisions.
Diniz MB; Lima LM; Eckert G; Zandona AG; Cordeiro RC; Pinto LS
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):133-42. PubMed ID: 21777096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Reliability analysis using the in-lux examination method for dental indices in adolescents for use in epidemiological studies.
Pinto RDS; Vettore MV; de Abreu MHGN; Palmier AC; de Moura RNV; Roncalli AG
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2023 Oct; 51(5):847-853. PubMed ID: 35864597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Caries diagnosis: agreement between WHO and ICDAS II criteria in epidemiological surveys.
Iranzo-Cortés JE; Montiel-Company JM; Almerich-Silla JM
Community Dent Health; 2013 Jun; 30(2):108-11. PubMed ID: 23888541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Is it feasible to use smartphone images to perform telediagnosis of different stages of occlusal caries lesions?
Kohara EK; Abdala CG; Novaes TF; Braga MM; Haddad AE; Mendes FM
PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0202116. PubMed ID: 30188900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Clinical performance of two fluorescence-based methods in detecting occlusal caries lesions in primary teeth.
Matos R; Novaes TF; Braga MM; Siqueira WL; Duarte DA; Mendes FM
Caries Res; 2011; 45(3):294-302. PubMed ID: 21625126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Occlusal caries: Evaluation of direct microscopy versus digital imaging used for two histological classification systems.
Jablonski-Momeni A; Ricketts DN; Stachniss V; Maschka R; Heinzel-Gutenbrunner M; Pieper K
J Dent; 2009 Mar; 37(3):204-11. PubMed ID: 19124186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparing potential early caries assessment methods for teledentistry.
Van Hilsen Z; Jones RS
BMC Oral Health; 2013 Mar; 13():16. PubMed ID: 23537067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Validity and reliability of methods for the detection of secondary caries around amalgam restorations in primary teeth.
Braga MM; Chiarotti AP; Imparato JC; Mendes FM
Braz Oral Res; 2010; 24(1):102-7. PubMed ID: 20339722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of dental hygienists and dentists: clinical and teledentistry identification of dental caries in children.
Daniel SJ; Kumar S
Int J Dent Hyg; 2017 Nov; 15(4):e143-e148. PubMed ID: 27256722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS): an integrated system for measuring dental caries.
Ismail AI; Sohn W; Tellez M; Amaya A; Sen A; Hasson H; Pitts NB
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2007 Jun; 35(3):170-8. PubMed ID: 17518963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Reliability of self-reported toothbrushing frequency as an indicator for the assessment of oral hygiene in epidemiological research on caries in adolescents: a cross-sectional study.
Gil GS; Morikava FS; Santin GC; Pintarelli TP; Fraiz FC; Ferreira FM
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Mar; 15():14. PubMed ID: 25887179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Clinical evaluation of polypropylene glycol-based caries detecting dyes for primary and permanent carious dentin.
Hosoya Y; Taguchi T; Arita S; Tay FR
J Dent; 2008 Dec; 36(12):1041-7. PubMed ID: 18938022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Validation of quantitative light-induced fluorescence-digital (QLF-D) for the detection of approximal caries in vitro.
Ko HY; Kang SM; Kim HE; Kwon HK; Kim BI
J Dent; 2015 May; 43(5):568-75. PubMed ID: 25724115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Dental caries diagnosis calibration for clinical field surveys.
Cleaton-Jones P; Hargreaves JA; Fatti LP; Chandler HD; Grossman ES
Caries Res; 1989; 23(3):195-9. PubMed ID: 2736583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Dental screening of preschool children using teledentistry: a feasibility study.
Kopycka-Kedzierawski DT; Billings RJ; McConnochie KM
Pediatr Dent; 2007; 29(3):209-13. PubMed ID: 17688017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Using laser fluorescence (DIAGNOdent) in surveys for the detection of noncavitated occlusal dentine caries.
Rando-Meirelles MP; de Sousa Mda L
Community Dent Health; 2011 Mar; 28(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 21485229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Development of a standardisation device for photographic assessment of dental fluorosis in field studies.
Soto-Rojas AE; Martínez-Mier EA; Ureña-Cirett J; Jackson RD; Stookey GK
Oral Health Prev Dent; 2008; 6(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 18399305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Activity assessment has little impact on caries parameters reduction in epidemiological surveys with preschool children.
Piovesan C; Ardenghi TM; Guedes RS; Ekstrand KR; Braga MM; Mendes FM
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2013 Jun; 41(3):204-11. PubMed ID: 23004568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Assessment of mother's ability in caries diagnosis, utilizing the smartphone photographic method.
Kale S; Kakodkar P; Shetiya SH
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2019; 37(4):360-364. PubMed ID: 31710010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]