BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23550505)

  • 21. Validity and reliability of remote dental screening by different oral health professionals using a store-and-forward telehealth model.
    Estai M; Winters J; Kanagasingam Y; Shiikha J; Checker H; Kruger E; Tennant M
    Br Dent J; 2016 Oct; 221(7):411-414. PubMed ID: 27713449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. In vitro evaluation of ICDAS and radiographic examination of occlusal surfaces and their association with treatment decisions.
    Diniz MB; Lima LM; Eckert G; Zandona AG; Cordeiro RC; Pinto LS
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):133-42. PubMed ID: 21777096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Reliability analysis using the in-lux examination method for dental indices in adolescents for use in epidemiological studies.
    Pinto RDS; Vettore MV; de Abreu MHGN; Palmier AC; de Moura RNV; Roncalli AG
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2023 Oct; 51(5):847-853. PubMed ID: 35864597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Caries diagnosis: agreement between WHO and ICDAS II criteria in epidemiological surveys.
    Iranzo-Cortés JE; Montiel-Company JM; Almerich-Silla JM
    Community Dent Health; 2013 Jun; 30(2):108-11. PubMed ID: 23888541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Is it feasible to use smartphone images to perform telediagnosis of different stages of occlusal caries lesions?
    Kohara EK; Abdala CG; Novaes TF; Braga MM; Haddad AE; Mendes FM
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0202116. PubMed ID: 30188900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Clinical performance of two fluorescence-based methods in detecting occlusal caries lesions in primary teeth.
    Matos R; Novaes TF; Braga MM; Siqueira WL; Duarte DA; Mendes FM
    Caries Res; 2011; 45(3):294-302. PubMed ID: 21625126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Occlusal caries: Evaluation of direct microscopy versus digital imaging used for two histological classification systems.
    Jablonski-Momeni A; Ricketts DN; Stachniss V; Maschka R; Heinzel-Gutenbrunner M; Pieper K
    J Dent; 2009 Mar; 37(3):204-11. PubMed ID: 19124186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparing potential early caries assessment methods for teledentistry.
    Van Hilsen Z; Jones RS
    BMC Oral Health; 2013 Mar; 13():16. PubMed ID: 23537067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Validity and reliability of methods for the detection of secondary caries around amalgam restorations in primary teeth.
    Braga MM; Chiarotti AP; Imparato JC; Mendes FM
    Braz Oral Res; 2010; 24(1):102-7. PubMed ID: 20339722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of dental hygienists and dentists: clinical and teledentistry identification of dental caries in children.
    Daniel SJ; Kumar S
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2017 Nov; 15(4):e143-e148. PubMed ID: 27256722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS): an integrated system for measuring dental caries.
    Ismail AI; Sohn W; Tellez M; Amaya A; Sen A; Hasson H; Pitts NB
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2007 Jun; 35(3):170-8. PubMed ID: 17518963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Reliability of self-reported toothbrushing frequency as an indicator for the assessment of oral hygiene in epidemiological research on caries in adolescents: a cross-sectional study.
    Gil GS; Morikava FS; Santin GC; Pintarelli TP; Fraiz FC; Ferreira FM
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Mar; 15():14. PubMed ID: 25887179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Clinical evaluation of polypropylene glycol-based caries detecting dyes for primary and permanent carious dentin.
    Hosoya Y; Taguchi T; Arita S; Tay FR
    J Dent; 2008 Dec; 36(12):1041-7. PubMed ID: 18938022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Validation of quantitative light-induced fluorescence-digital (QLF-D) for the detection of approximal caries in vitro.
    Ko HY; Kang SM; Kim HE; Kwon HK; Kim BI
    J Dent; 2015 May; 43(5):568-75. PubMed ID: 25724115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Dental caries diagnosis calibration for clinical field surveys.
    Cleaton-Jones P; Hargreaves JA; Fatti LP; Chandler HD; Grossman ES
    Caries Res; 1989; 23(3):195-9. PubMed ID: 2736583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Dental screening of preschool children using teledentistry: a feasibility study.
    Kopycka-Kedzierawski DT; Billings RJ; McConnochie KM
    Pediatr Dent; 2007; 29(3):209-13. PubMed ID: 17688017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Using laser fluorescence (DIAGNOdent) in surveys for the detection of noncavitated occlusal dentine caries.
    Rando-Meirelles MP; de Sousa Mda L
    Community Dent Health; 2011 Mar; 28(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 21485229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Development of a standardisation device for photographic assessment of dental fluorosis in field studies.
    Soto-Rojas AE; Martínez-Mier EA; Ureña-Cirett J; Jackson RD; Stookey GK
    Oral Health Prev Dent; 2008; 6(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 18399305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Activity assessment has little impact on caries parameters reduction in epidemiological surveys with preschool children.
    Piovesan C; Ardenghi TM; Guedes RS; Ekstrand KR; Braga MM; Mendes FM
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2013 Jun; 41(3):204-11. PubMed ID: 23004568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Assessment of mother's ability in caries diagnosis, utilizing the smartphone photographic method.
    Kale S; Kakodkar P; Shetiya SH
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2019; 37(4):360-364. PubMed ID: 31710010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.