These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23550611)

  • 1. Quantifying the effect of habitat availability on species distributions.
    Aarts G; Fieberg J; Brasseur S; Matthiopoulos J
    J Anim Ecol; 2013 Nov; 82(6):1135-45. PubMed ID: 23550611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mixed conditional logistic regression for habitat selection studies.
    Duchesne T; Fortin D; Courbin N
    J Anim Ecol; 2010 May; 79(3):548-55. PubMed ID: 20202010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Defining the scale of habitat availability for models of habitat selection.
    Paton RS; Matthiopoulos J
    Ecology; 2016 May; 97(5):1113-22. PubMed ID: 27349089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The functional value of Caribbean coral reef, seagrass and mangrove habitats to ecosystem processes.
    Harborne AR; Mumby PJ; Micheli F; Perry CT; Dahlgren CP; Holmes KE; Brumbaugh DR
    Adv Mar Biol; 2006; 50():57-189. PubMed ID: 16782451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The importance of incorporating functional habitats into conservation planning for highly mobile species in dynamic systems.
    Webb MH; Terauds A; Tulloch A; Bell P; Stojanovic D; Heinsohn R
    Conserv Biol; 2017 Oct; 31(5):1018-1028. PubMed ID: 28130909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The point process use-availability or presence-only likelihood and comments on analysis.
    McDonald TL
    J Anim Ecol; 2013 Nov; 82(6):1174-82. PubMed ID: 24111555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Movement is the glue connecting home ranges and habitat selection.
    Van Moorter B; Rolandsen CM; Basille M; Gaillard JM
    J Anim Ecol; 2016 Jan; 85(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 25980987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Emergent properties of conspecific attraction in fragmented landscapes.
    Fletcher RJ
    Am Nat; 2006 Aug; 168(2):207-19. PubMed ID: 16874630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimating animal resource selection from telemetry data using point process models.
    Johnson DS; Hooten MB; Kuhn CE
    J Anim Ecol; 2013 Nov; 82(6):1155-64. PubMed ID: 23800202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spatial scale and movement behaviour traits control the impacts of habitat fragmentation on individual fitness.
    Cattarino L; McAlpine CA; Rhodes JR
    J Anim Ecol; 2016 Jan; 85(1):168-77. PubMed ID: 26250334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Process-based approach reveals directional effects of environmental factors on movement between habitats.
    Nakayama S; Ojanguren AF; Fuiman LA
    J Anim Ecol; 2011 Nov; 80(6):1299-304. PubMed ID: 21569030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Functional responses in habitat selection: clarifying hypotheses and interpretations.
    Holbrook JD; Olson LE; DeCesare NJ; Hebblewhite M; Squires JR; Steenweg R
    Ecol Appl; 2019 Apr; 29(3):e01852. PubMed ID: 30653797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A re-evaluation of a case-control model with contaminated controls for resource selection studies.
    Rota CT; Millspaugh JJ; Kesler DC; Lehman CP; Rumble MA; Jachowski CM
    J Anim Ecol; 2013 Nov; 82(6):1165-73. PubMed ID: 23701233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Coexistence and invasibility in a two-species competition model with habitat-preference.
    Pigolotti S; Cencini M
    J Theor Biol; 2010 Aug; 265(4):609-17. PubMed ID: 20665971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ontogenetic and sex-based differences in habitat preferences and site fidelity of White's seahorse Hippocampus whitei.
    Harasti D; Martin-Smith K; Gladstone W
    J Fish Biol; 2014 Nov; 85(5):1413-28. PubMed ID: 25098708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Considering ecological dynamics in resource selection functions.
    McLoughlin PD; Morris DW; Fortin D; Vander Wal E; Contasti AL
    J Anim Ecol; 2010 Jan; 79(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 19732211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Temporal scales, trade-offs, and functional responses in red deer habitat selection.
    Godvik IM; Loe LE; Vik JO; Veiberg V; Langvatn R; Mysterud A
    Ecology; 2009 Mar; 90(3):699-710. PubMed ID: 19341140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. REVIEW: Can habitat selection predict abundance?
    Boyce MS; Johnson CJ; Merrill EH; Nielsen SE; Solberg EJ; van Moorter B
    J Anim Ecol; 2016 Jan; 85(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 25786026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Chapter 4. Susceptibility of sharks, rays and chimaeras to global extinction.
    Field IC; Meekan MG; Buckworth RC; Bradshaw CJ
    Adv Mar Biol; 2009; 56():275-363. PubMed ID: 19895977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Increasing density leads to generalization in both coarse-grained habitat selection and fine-grained resource selection in a large mammal.
    van Beest FM; Uzal A; Vander Wal E; Laforge MP; Contasti AL; Colville D; McLoughlin PD
    J Anim Ecol; 2014 Jan; 83(1):147-56. PubMed ID: 23931034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.