These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23550756)

  • 1. Deciphering the evolutionary history and developmental mechanisms of a complex sexual ornament: the abdominal appendages of Sepsidae (Diptera).
    Bowsher JH; Ang Y; Ferderer T; Meier R
    Evolution; 2013 Apr; 67(4):1069-80. PubMed ID: 23550756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative analysis reveals the complex role of histoblast nest size in the evolution of novel insect abdominal appendages in Sepsidae (Diptera).
    Melicher D; Su KFY; Meier R; Bowsher JH
    BMC Evol Biol; 2018 Oct; 18(1):151. PubMed ID: 30314458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evolution of novel abdominal appendages in a sepsid fly from histoblasts, not imaginal discs.
    Bowsher JH; Nijhout HF
    Evol Dev; 2007; 9(4):347-54. PubMed ID: 17651359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multiple origins of a major novelty: moveable abdominal lobes in male sepsid flies (Diptera: Sepsidae), and the question of developmental constraints.
    Eberhard WG
    Evol Dev; 2001; 3(3):206-22. PubMed ID: 11440252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Selection on bristle length has the ability to drive the evolution of male abdominal appendages in the sepsid fly Themira biloba.
    Herath B; Dochtermann NA; Johnson JI; Leonard Z; Bowsher JH
    J Evol Biol; 2015 Dec; 28(12):2308-17. PubMed ID: 26356143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bending for love: losses and gains of sexual dimorphisms are strictly correlated with changes in the mounting position of sepsid flies (Sepsidae: Diptera).
    Puniamoorthy N; Su KF; Meier R
    BMC Evol Biol; 2008 May; 8():155. PubMed ID: 18492287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Size rather than complexity of sexual ornaments prolongs male metamorphosis and explains sexual size dimorphism in sepsid flies.
    Rajaratnam G; Lui G; Su KFY; Chew MSJ; Ang Y; Puniamoorthy N; Rohner PT; Blanckenhorn WU; Meier R
    Proc Biol Sci; 2023 May; 290(1998):20222531. PubMed ID: 37132233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stalk-eyed flies (Diopsidae): modelling the evolution and development of an exaggerated sexual trait.
    Warren I; Smith H
    Bioessays; 2007 Mar; 29(3):300-7. PubMed ID: 17295307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Partial co-option of the appendage patterning pathway in the development of abdominal appendages in the sepsid fly Themira biloba.
    Bowsher JH; Nijhout HF
    Dev Genes Evol; 2009 Dec; 219(11-12):577-87. PubMed ID: 20182886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differential investment in pre- vs. post-copulatory sexual selection reinforces a cross-continental reversal of sexual size dimorphism in Sepsis punctum (Diptera: Sepsidae).
    Puniamoorthy N; Blanckenhorn WU; Schäfer MA
    J Evol Biol; 2012 Nov; 25(11):2253-63. PubMed ID: 22984945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Comparative Study of the Role of Sex-Specific Condition Dependence in the Evolution of Sexually Dimorphic Traits.
    Rohner PT; Blanckenhorn WU
    Am Nat; 2018 Dec; 192(6):E202-E215. PubMed ID: 30444660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Convergent evolution of sexual shape dimorphism in Diptera.
    Bonduriansky R
    J Morphol; 2006 May; 267(5):602-11. PubMed ID: 16477603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evolutionary innovations overcome ancestral constraints: a re-examination of character evolution in male sepsid flies (Diptera: Sepsidae).
    Wagner GP; Müller GB
    Evol Dev; 2002; 4(1):1-6; discussion 7-8. PubMed ID: 11868655
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Unlocking the "Black box": internal female genitalia in Sepsidae (Diptera) evolve fast and are species-specific.
    Puniamoorthy N; Kotrba M; Meier R
    BMC Evol Biol; 2010 Sep; 10():275. PubMed ID: 20831809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sexual selection on multiple female ornaments in dance flies.
    Murray RL; Wheeler J; Gwynne DT; Bussière LF
    Proc Biol Sci; 2018 Sep; 285(1887):. PubMed ID: 30232158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Patterning mechanisms and morphological diversity of spider appendages and their importance for spider evolution.
    Pechmann M; Khadjeh S; Sprenger F; Prpic NM
    Arthropod Struct Dev; 2010 Nov; 39(6):453-67. PubMed ID: 20696272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The evolution of condition-dependent sexual dimorphism.
    Bonduriansky R
    Am Nat; 2007 Jan; 169(1):9-19. PubMed ID: 17206580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intralocus sexual conflict and the genetic architecture of sexually dimorphic traits in Prochyliza xanthostoma (Diptera: Piophilidae).
    Bonduriansky R; Rowe L
    Evolution; 2005 Sep; 59(9):1965-75. PubMed ID: 16261734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Condition dependence of developmental stability in the sexually dimorphic fly Telostylinus angusticollis (Diptera: Neriidae).
    Bonduriansky R
    J Evol Biol; 2009 Apr; 22(4):861-72. PubMed ID: 19220651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evolution of sexual dimorphism and male dimorphism in the expression of beetle horns: phylogenetic evidence for modularity, evolutionary lability, and constraint.
    Emlen DJ; Hunt J; Simmons LW
    Am Nat; 2005 Oct; 166 Suppl 4():S42-68. PubMed ID: 16224711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.