225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23550791)
1. A randomised, non-crossover study of the GuardianCPV Laryngeal Mask versus the LMA Supreme in paralysed, anaesthetised female patients.
Tiefenthaler W; Eschertzhuber S; Brimacombe J; Fricke E; Keller C; Kaufmann M
Anaesthesia; 2013 Jun; 68(6):600-4. PubMed ID: 23550791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The laryngeal mask airway Supreme--a single use laryngeal mask airway with an oesophageal vent. A randomised, cross-over study with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal in paralysed, anaesthetised patients.
Eschertzhuber S; Brimacombe J; Hohlrieder M; Keller C
Anaesthesia; 2009 Jan; 64(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 19087011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Randomized crossover study assessing oropharyngeal leak pressure and fiber optic positioning : Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme™ versus Laryngeal Tube LTS II™ size 2 in non-paralyzed anesthetized children.
Gasteiger L; Ofner S; Stögermüller B; Ziegler B; Brimacombe J; Keller C
Anaesthesist; 2016 Aug; 65(8):585-9. PubMed ID: 27380049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Safety and efficacy of laryngeal mask airway Supreme versus laryngeal mask airway ProSeal: a randomized controlled trial.
Seet E; Rajeev S; Firoz T; Yousaf F; Wong J; Wong DT; Chung F
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Jul; 27(7):602-7. PubMed ID: 20540172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Randomised crossover comparison of the Ambu AuraOnce Laryngeal Mask with the LMA Classic laryngeal mask airway in paralysed anaesthetised patients.
Shariffuddin II; Wang CY
Anaesthesia; 2008 Jan; 63(1):82-5. PubMed ID: 18086075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prospective clinical and fiberoptic evaluation of the Supreme laryngeal mask airway.
Timmermann A; Cremer S; Eich C; Kazmaier S; Bräuer A; Graf BM; Russo SG
Anesthesiology; 2009 Feb; 110(2):262-5. PubMed ID: 19194153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparisons of clinical performance of Guardian laryngeal mask with laryngeal mask airway ProSeal.
Pajiyar AK; Wen Z; Wang H; Ma L; Miao L; Wang G
BMC Anesthesiol; 2015 May; 15():69. PubMed ID: 25929558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Similar oropharyngeal leak pressures during anaesthesia with i-gel, LMA-ProSeal and LMA-Supreme Laryngeal Masks.
Van Zundert TC; Brimacombe JR
Acta Anaesthesiol Belg; 2012; 63(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 22783708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ambu® AuraGain™ versus LMA Supreme™ Second Seal™: a randomised controlled trial comparing oropharyngeal leak pressures and gastric drain functionality in spontaneously breathing patients.
Shariffuddin II; Teoh WH; Tang E; Hashim N; Loh PS
Anaesth Intensive Care; 2017 Mar; 45(2):244-250. PubMed ID: 28267947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A randomized comparison of the laryngeal mask airway supreme™ and laryngeal mask airway unique™ in infants and children: does cuff pressure influence leak pressure?
Jagannathan N; Sohn L; Sommers K; Belvis D; Shah RD; Sawardekar A; Eidem J; Dagraca J; Mukherji I
Paediatr Anaesth; 2013 Oct; 23(10):927-33. PubMed ID: 23521105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of laryngeal mask airway (LMA)- Proseal and the LMA-Classic in ventilated children receiving neuromuscular blockade.
Lardner DR; Cox RG; Ewen A; Dickinson D
Can J Anaesth; 2008 Jan; 55(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 18166745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the laryngeal mask airway Supreme and laryngeal mask airway Classic in adults.
Ali A; Canturk S; Turkmen A; Turgut N; Altan A
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2009 Dec; 26(12):1010-4. PubMed ID: 19707148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. LMA Supreme™ vs i-gel™--a comparison of insertion success in novices.
Ragazzi R; Finessi L; Farinelli I; Alvisi R; Volta CA
Anaesthesia; 2012 Apr; 67(4):384-8. PubMed ID: 22329593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of the disposable versus the reusable laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed adult patients.
Brimacombe J; Keller C; Morris R; Mecklem D
Anesth Analg; 1998 Oct; 87(4):921-4. PubMed ID: 9768795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The LMA-Supreme versus the I-gel in simulated difficult airway in children: a randomised study.
Kus A; Gok CN; Hosten T; Gurkan Y; Solak M; Toker K
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2014 May; 31(5):280-4. PubMed ID: 24632572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A randomised, crossover comparison between the CobraPLA and the LMA Classic in paralysed patients.
Nam SB; Han DW; Chang CH; Lee JS
Anaesthesia; 2007 Dec; 62(12):1285-8. PubMed ID: 17991267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A prospective randomized comparison of airway seal using the novel vision-guided insertion of LMA-Supreme® and LMA-Protector®.
van Zundert AAJ; Wyssusek KH; Pelecanos A; Roets M; Kumar CM
J Clin Monit Comput; 2020 Apr; 34(2):285-294. PubMed ID: 30953222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Laryngeal mask airway protector generates higher oropharyngeal leak pressures compared to the laryngeal mask airway supreme: A randomized clinical trial in the ambulatory surgery unit.
Acx E; Van Caelenberg E; De Baerdemaeker L; Coppens M
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol; 2021; 37(2):221-225. PubMed ID: 34349370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A prospective, randomized trial of the Ambu AuraGain™ laryngeal mask versus the LMA® protector airway in paralyzed, anesthetized adult men.
Moser B; Audigé L; Keller C; Brimacombe J; Gasteiger L; Bruppacher HR
Minerva Anestesiol; 2018 Jun; 84(6):684-692. PubMed ID: 29152934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Oropharyngeal leak pressure with the laryngeal mask airway Supreme™ at different intracuff pressures: a randomized controlled trial.
Zhang L; Seet E; Mehta V; Subramanyam R; Ankichetty SP; Wong DT; Chung F
Can J Anaesth; 2011 Jul; 58(7):624-629. PubMed ID: 21533663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
