255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23550914)
1. Longevity of direct restorations in stress-bearing posterior cavities: a retrospective study.
Rho YJ; Namgung C; Jin BH; Lim BS; Cho BH
Oper Dent; 2013; 38(6):572-82. PubMed ID: 23550914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A retrospective clinical study of cervical restorations: longevity and failure-prognostic variables.
Namgung C; Rho YJ; Jin BH; Lim BS; Cho BH
Oper Dent; 2013; 38(4):376-85. PubMed ID: 23215544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Longevity of posterior resin composite restorations in permanent teeth in Public Dental Health Service: a prospective 8 years follow up.
Pallesen U; van Dijken JW; Halken J; Hallonsten AL; Höigaard R
J Dent; 2013 Apr; 41(4):297-306. PubMed ID: 23228499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Twelve-year survival of 2-surface composite resin and amalgam premolar restorations placed by dental students.
Naghipur S; Pesun I; Nowakowski A; Kim A
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Sep; 116(3):336-9. PubMed ID: 27086110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Frequency of restoration replacement in posterior teeth for U.S. Navy and Marine Corps personnel.
Laccabue M; Ahlf RL; Simecek JW
Oper Dent; 2014; 39(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 23802636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of Refurbishing Amalgam and Resin Composite Restorations After 12 Years: Controlled Clinical Trial.
Estay J; Martín J; Vildosola P; Mjor IA; Oliveira OB; Andrade MF; Moncada G; Gordan VV; Fernández E
Oper Dent; 2017; 42(6):587-595. PubMed ID: 28857709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Repair may increase survival of direct posterior restorations - A practice based study.
Casagrande L; Laske M; Bronkhorst EM; Huysmans MCDNJM; Opdam NJM
J Dent; 2017 Sep; 64():30-36. PubMed ID: 28602850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Direct composite resin fillings versus amalgam fillings for permanent or adult posterior teeth.
Rasines Alcaraz MG; Veitz-Keenan A; Sahrmann P; Schmidlin PR; Davis D; Iheozor-Ejiofor Z
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Mar; (3):CD005620. PubMed ID: 24683067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Longevity of 2- and 3-surface restorations in posterior teeth of 25- to 30-year-olds attending Public Dental Service-A 13-year observation.
Palotie U; Eronen AK; Vehkalahti K; Vehkalahti MM
J Dent; 2017 Jul; 62():13-17. PubMed ID: 28529175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Selection of dental materials and longevity of replaced restorations in Public Dental Health clinics in northern Sweden.
Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K; van Dijken JW; Funegård U; Lindberg A; Nilsson M
J Dent; 2009 Sep; 37(9):673-8. PubMed ID: 19477572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preventive resin restorations vs. amalgam restorations: a three-year clinical study.
Cloyd S; Gilpatrick RO; Moore D
J Tenn Dent Assoc; 1997 Oct; 77(4):36-40. PubMed ID: 9520761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Nine-year evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite/resin composite open sandwich technique in Class II cavities.
Lindberg A; van Dijken JW; Lindberg M
J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 16956709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations.
Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Roeters JM; Loomans BA
Dent Mater; 2007 Jan; 23(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 16417916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical results and new developments of direct posterior restorations.
Hickel R; Manhart J; García-Godoy F
Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):41D-54D. PubMed ID: 11763918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. 12 Years of Repair of Amalgam and Composite Resins: A Clinical Study.
Estay J; Martín J; Viera V; Valdivieso J; Bersezio C; Vildosola P; Mjor IA; Andrade MF; Moraes RR; Moncada G; Gordan VV; Fernández E
Oper Dent; 2018; 43(1):12-21. PubMed ID: 28976841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Longevity of posterior dental restorations and reasons for failure.
Kopperud SE; Tveit AB; Gaarden T; Sandvik L; Espelid I
Eur J Oral Sci; 2012 Dec; 120(6):539-48. PubMed ID: 23167471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Longevity of occlusally-stressed restorations in posterior primary teeth.
Hickel R; Kaaden C; Paschos E; Buerkle V; García-Godoy F; Manhart J
Am J Dent; 2005 Jun; 18(3):198-211. PubMed ID: 16158813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Longevity and associated risk factors in adhesive restorations of young permanent teeth after complete and selective caries removal: a retrospective study.
Casagrande L; Seminario AT; Correa MB; Werle SB; Maltz M; Demarco FF; Araujo FB
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Apr; 21(3):847-855. PubMed ID: 27103587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Patient risk factors' influence on survival of posterior composites.
van de Sande FH; Opdam NJ; Rodolpho PA; Correa MB; Demarco FF; Cenci MS
J Dent Res; 2013 Jul; 92(7 Suppl):78S-83S. PubMed ID: 23690354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Composite veneering of complex amalgam restorations.
Demarco FF; Zanchi CH; Bueno M; Piva E
Oper Dent; 2007; 32(1):94-8. PubMed ID: 17288335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
