These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

27 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23551151)

  • 1. Personality trait similarity between spouses in four cultures.
    McCrae RR; Martin TA; Hrebícková M; Urbánek T; Boomsma DI; Willemsen G; Costa PT
    J Pers; 2008 Oct; 76(5):1137-64. PubMed ID: 18665894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In-Law Preferences for Similarity: Comparing Parent and Child Preferences for In-Law/Intimate Partner Similarity.
    Wang Y; Apostolou M; Peng X
    Evol Psychol; 2024; 22(1):14747049241234291. PubMed ID: 38403963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Parental choice: exploring in-law preferences and their contingencies in the Greek-Cypriot culture.
    Apostolou M
    Evol Psychol; 2014 Jan; 12(1):54-72. PubMed ID: 24480628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cognitive processes underlying human mate choice: The relationship between self-perception and mate preference in Western society.
    Buston PM; Emlen ST
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2003 Jul; 100(15):8805-10. PubMed ID: 12843405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Partner choice, confounding and trait convergence all contribute to phenotypic partner similarity.
    Sjaarda J; Kutalik Z
    Nat Hum Behav; 2023 May; 7(5):776-789. PubMed ID: 36928782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the similarity between exchangeable profiles: A psychometric model, analytic strategy, and empirical illustration.
    Furr RM; Wood D
    J Res Pers; 2013 Jun; 47(3):233-247. PubMed ID: 24039314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evidence of correlations between human partners based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses of 22 traits and UK Biobank analysis of 133 traits.
    Horwitz TB; Balbona JV; Paulich KN; Keller MC
    Nat Hum Behav; 2023 Sep; 7(9):1568-1583. PubMed ID: 37653148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Singles' similarity preferences in an ideal partner: What, when, and why.
    Liu J; Zhang Y
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1088591. PubMed ID: 36935980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Why do we pick similar mates, or do we?
    Versluys TMM; Flintham EO; Mas-Sandoval A; Savolainen V
    Biol Lett; 2021 Nov; 17(11):20210463. PubMed ID: 34813721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Singles' Reasons for Being Single: Empirical Evidence From an Evolutionary Perspective.
    Apostolou M; O J; Esposito G
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():746. PubMed ID: 32435217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Actor, partner, and similarity effects of personality on global and experienced well-being.
    Chopik WJ; Lucas RE
    J Res Pers; 2019 Feb; 78():249-261. PubMed ID: 31123370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Longitudinal actor, partner, and similarity effects of personality on well-being.
    van Scheppingen MA; Chopik WJ; Bleidorn W; Denissen JJA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2019 Oct; 117(4):e51-e70. PubMed ID: 30102060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Linked Lives: Dyadic Associations of Mastery Beliefs With Health (Behavior) and Health (Behavior) Change Among Older Partners.
    Drewelies J; Chopik WJ; Hoppmann CA; Smith J; Gerstorf D
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2018 Jun; 73(5):787-798. PubMed ID: 27229003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of active assortment in spousal similarity.
    Watson D; Beer A; McDade-Montez E
    J Pers; 2014 Apr; 82(2):116-29. PubMed ID: 23551151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Match makers and deal breakers: analyses of assortative mating in newlywed couples.
    Watson D; Klohnen EC; Casillas A; Simms EN; Haig J; Berry DS
    J Pers; 2004 Oct; 72(5):1029-68. PubMed ID: 15335336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Couple similarity and marital satisfaction: are similar spouses happier?
    Gaunt R
    J Pers; 2006 Oct; 74(5):1401-20. PubMed ID: 16958707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using revealed mate preferences to evaluate market force and differential preference explanations for mate selection.
    Wood D; Brumbaugh CC
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Jun; 96(6):1226-44. PubMed ID: 19469598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Big two personality and big three mate preferences: similarity attracts, but country-level mate preferences crucially matter.
    Gebauer JE; Leary MR; Neberich W
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2012 Dec; 38(12):1579-93. PubMed ID: 22956293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Similarity, agreement, and assumed similarity in proxy end-of-life decision making.
    McDade-Montez E; Watson D; Beer A
    Fam Syst Health; 2013 Dec; 31(4):366-81. PubMed ID: 23957875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 2.