These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23551510)

  • 1. Comparison of the centring ability of the ProTaper™ and ProTaper Universal™ rotary systems for preparing curved root canals.
    Aguiar CM; Sobrinho PB; Teles F; Câmara AC; de Figueiredo JA
    Aust Endod J; 2013 Apr; 39(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 23551510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the centreing ability of the ProTaper Universal rotary system in curved roots in comparison to Nitiflex files.
    Aguiar CM; de Andrade Mendes D; Câmara AC; de Figueiredo JA
    Aust Endod J; 2009 Dec; 35(3):174-9. PubMed ID: 19961458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Instrument separation analysis of multi-used ProTaper Universal rotary system during root canal therapy.
    Wu J; Lei G; Yan M; Yu Y; Yu J; Zhang G
    J Endod; 2011 Jun; 37(6):758-63. PubMed ID: 21787484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of canal walls after biomechanical preparation of root canals instrumented with Protaper Universal rotary system.
    Aguiar CM; Mendes Dde A; Câmara AC; Figueiredo AP
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2009; 17(6):590-5. PubMed ID: 20027432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Root canal shaping using rotary nickel-titanium files in preclinical dental education in Turkey.
    Ünal GÇ; Maden M; Orhan EO; Sarıtekin E; Teke A
    J Dent Educ; 2012 Apr; 76(4):509-13. PubMed ID: 22473564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of the NiTi rotary system on the debridement quality of the root canal space.
    De-Deus G; Garcia-Filho P
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Oct; 108(4):e71-6. PubMed ID: 19778736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Master file size and apical transportation in severely curved root canals.
    Moradi S; Disfani R; Baziar H; Daneshvar F; Jafarzadeh H
    N Z Dent J; 2014 Dec; 110(4):126-9. PubMed ID: 25597191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. ProTaper rotary instrument fracture during root canal preparation: a comparison between rotary and hybrid techniques.
    Farid H; Khan FR; Rahman M
    Oral Health Dent Manag; 2013 Mar; 12(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 23474581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hard-tissue debris accumulation created by conventional rotary versus self-adjusting file instrumentation in mesial root canal systems of mandibular molars.
    Paqué F; Al-Jadaa A; Kfir A
    Int Endod J; 2012 May; 45(5):413-8. PubMed ID: 22188277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficacy of three different rotary files to remove gutta-percha and Resilon from root canals.
    Marfisi K; Mercade M; Plotino G; Duran-Sindreu F; Bueno R; Roig M
    Int Endod J; 2010 Nov; 43(11):1022-8. PubMed ID: 20726911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The challenge of C-shaped canal systems: a comparative study of the self-adjusting file and ProTaper.
    Solomonov M; Paqué F; Fan B; Eilat Y; Berman LH
    J Endod; 2012 Feb; 38(2):209-14. PubMed ID: 22244638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Suboptimal debridement quality produced by the single-file F2 ProTaper technique in oval-shaped canals.
    De-Deus G; Barino B; Zamolyi RQ; Souza E; Fonseca A; Fidel S; Fidel RA
    J Endod; 2010 Nov; 36(11):1897-900. PubMed ID: 20951309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rotary Mtwo system versus manual K-file instruments: efficacy in preparing primary and permanent molar root canals.
    Azar MR; Mokhtare M
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):363. PubMed ID: 21891918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. SEM evaluation of canal wall dentine following use of Mtwo and ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments.
    Foschi F; Nucci C; Montebugnoli L; Marchionni S; Breschi L; Malagnino VA; Prati C
    Int Endod J; 2004 Dec; 37(12):832-9. PubMed ID: 15548274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Root canal area increase promoted by the EndoSequence and ProTaper systems: comparison by computed tomography.
    Bernardes RA; Rocha EA; Duarte MA; Vivan RR; de Moraes IG; Bramante AS; de Azevedo JR
    J Endod; 2010 Jul; 36(7):1179-82. PubMed ID: 20630294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of the deviation after biomechanical preparation of the coronal, middle, and apical thirds of root canals instrumented with three HERO rotary systems.
    Câmara AC; Aguiar CM; Poli de Figueiredo JA
    J Endod; 2007 Dec; 33(12):1460-3. PubMed ID: 18037059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Microscopic computerized tomographic evaluation of root canal transportation prepared with twisted or ground nickel-titanium rotary instruments.
    Freire LG; Gavini G; Branco-Barletta F; Sanches-Cunha R; dos Santos M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Dec; 112(6):e143-8. PubMed ID: 21937249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Self-adjusting files in retreatment: a high-resolution micro-computed tomography study.
    Solomonov M; Paqué F; Kaya S; Adigüzel O; Kfir A; Yiğit-Özer S
    J Endod; 2012 Sep; 38(9):1283-7. PubMed ID: 22892752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of cervical preflaring on determination of apical file size in mandibular molars: SEM analysis.
    Schmitz Mda S; Santos R; Capelli A; Jacobovitz M; Spanó JC; Pécora JD
    Braz Dent J; 2008; 19(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 18949299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effectiveness of different final irrigant activation protocols on smear layer removal in curved canals.
    Caron G; Nham K; Bronnec F; Machtou P
    J Endod; 2010 Aug; 36(8):1361-6. PubMed ID: 20647097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.