428 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23551569)
1. A prospective comparison of totally minimally invasive versus open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.
Noble F; Kelly JJ; Bailey IS; Byrne JP; Underwood TJ;
Dis Esophagus; 2013 Apr; 26(3):263-71. PubMed ID: 23551569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A standardized comparison of peri-operative complications after minimally invasive esophagectomy: Ivor Lewis versus McKeown.
Brown AM; Pucci MJ; Berger AC; Tatarian T; Evans NR; Rosato EL; Palazzo F
Surg Endosc; 2018 Jan; 32(1):204-211. PubMed ID: 28643075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Techniques and short-term outcomes for total minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophageal resection in distal esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancers: pooled data from six European centers.
Straatman J; van der Wielen N; Nieuwenhuijzen GA; Rosman C; Roig J; Scheepers JJ; Cuesta MA; Luyer MD; van Berge Henegouwen MI; van Workum F; Gisbertz SS; van der Peet DL
Surg Endosc; 2017 Jan; 31(1):119-126. PubMed ID: 27129563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Abdominothoracic esophageal resection according to Ivor Lewis with intrathoracic anastomosis : standardized totally minimally invasive technique].
Runkel N; Walz M; Ketelhut M
Chirurg; 2015 May; 86(5):468-75. PubMed ID: 24994588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Outcomes With Open and Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy After Neoadjuvant Therapy.
Tapias LF; Mathisen DJ; Wright CD; Wain JC; Gaissert HA; Muniappan A; Lanuti M; Donahue DM; Morse CR
Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Mar; 101(3):1097-103. PubMed ID: 26652140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Minimally invasive esophagectomy provides significant survival advantage compared with open or hybrid esophagectomy for patients with cancers of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction.
Palazzo F; Rosato EL; Chaudhary A; Evans NR; Sendecki JA; Keith S; Chojnacki KA; Yeo CJ; Berger AC
J Am Coll Surg; 2015 Apr; 220(4):672-9. PubMed ID: 25667145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minimally Invasive
Knitter S; Andreou A; Hofmann T; Chopra S; Denecke C; Thuss-Patience PC; Kröll D; Bahra M; Schmelzle M; Pratschke J; Biebl M
Anticancer Res; 2021 Jul; 41(7):3499-3510. PubMed ID: 34230145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy for resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma, a randomized controlled trial (ROBOT-2 trial).
Tagkalos E; van der Sluis PC; Berlth F; Poplawski A; Hadzijusufovic E; Lang H; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Gisbertz SS; Müller-Stich BP; Ruurda JP; Schiesser M; Schneider PM; van Hillegersberg R; Grimminger PP
BMC Cancer; 2021 Sep; 21(1):1060. PubMed ID: 34565343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: results of a prospective phase II multicenter trial-the eastern cooperative oncology group (E2202) study.
Luketich JD; Pennathur A; Franchetti Y; Catalano PJ; Swanson S; Sugarbaker DJ; De Hoyos A; Maddaus MA; Nguyen NT; Benson AB; Fernando HC
Ann Surg; 2015 Apr; 261(4):702-7. PubMed ID: 25575253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative Perioperative Outcomes by Esophagectomy Surgical Technique.
Meredith KL; Maramara T; Blinn P; Lee D; Huston J; Shridhar R
J Gastrointest Surg; 2020 Jun; 24(6):1261-1268. PubMed ID: 31197697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Anastomosis in minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy via two ports provides equivalent perioperative outcomes to open.
Zhao Y; Jiao W; Zhao J; Wang X; Luo Y; Wang Y
Indian J Cancer; 2015 Feb; 51 Suppl 2():e25-8. PubMed ID: 25712837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. FA01.01: MINIMALLY INVASIVE APPROACH RESULTS IN BETTER OUTCOME COMPARED TO OPEN ESOPHAGECTOMY-A PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHED ANALYSIS.
Kwan Kit Chan D; Siu Yin Chan F; King Hung Tong D; Yu Hong Wong I; Lai Yin Wong C; Ting Law T; Ying Kit Law S
Dis Esophagus; 2018 Sep; 31(13):1. PubMed ID: 30219909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Thoracoscopy in prone position with two-lung ventilation compared to conventional thoracotomy during Ivor Lewis procedure: a multicenter case-control study.
Souche R; Nayeri M; Chati R; Huet E; Donici I; Tuech JJ; Borie F; Prudhomme M; Jaber S; Fabre JM
Surg Endosc; 2020 Jan; 34(1):142-152. PubMed ID: 30868323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of perioperative outcomes following open versus minimally invasive Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy at a single, high-volume centre.
Sihag S; Wright CD; Wain JC; Gaissert HA; Lanuti M; Allan JS; Mathisen DJ; Morse CR
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2012 Sep; 42(3):430-7. PubMed ID: 22345284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Propensity Score-Matched Analysis Comparing Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Versus Minimally Invasive Mckeown Esophagectomy.
van Workum F; Slaman AE; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Gisbertz SS; Kouwenhoven EA; van Det MJ; van den Wildenberg FJH; Polat F; Luyer MDP; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Rosman C
Ann Surg; 2020 Jan; 271(1):128-133. PubMed ID: 30102633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of body mass index on operative outcome after robotic-assisted Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: retrospective analysis of 129 cases at a single high-volume tertiary care center.
Salem AI; Thau MR; Strom TJ; Abbott AM; Saeed N; Almhanna K; Hoffe SE; Shridhar R; Karl RC; Meredith KL
Dis Esophagus; 2017 Jan; 30(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 27149640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A preliminary experience with minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.
Tapias LF; Morse CR
Dis Esophagus; 2012 Jul; 25(5):449-55. PubMed ID: 21967644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evolving changes of minimally invasive esophagectomy: a single-institution experience.
Gambhir S; Daly S; Maithel S; Putnam LR; Nguyen J; Smith BR; Nguyen NT
Surg Endosc; 2020 Jun; 34(6):2503-2511. PubMed ID: 31385074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Decreasing morbidity and mortality in 100 consecutive minimally invasive esophagectomies.
Ben-David K; Sarosi GA; Cendan JC; Howard D; Rossidis G; Hochwald SN
Surg Endosc; 2012 Jan; 26(1):162-7. PubMed ID: 21792712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Short-term efficacy comparison between Ivor-Lewis approach and McKeown approach in minimally invasive esophagectomy].
Lin J; Kang M; Lin J; Chen S; Deng F; Han W; Lin R
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Sep; 17(9):888-91. PubMed ID: 25273657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
