These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23551713)

  • 1. Precision of fit and retention force of cast non-precious-crowns on standard titanium implant-abutment with different design and height.
    Enkling N; Ueda T; Gholami H; Bayer S; Katsoulis J; Mericske-Stern R
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Apr; 25(4):451-7. PubMed ID: 23551713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Retention of CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns on prefabricated implant abutments: an in vitro comparative study of luting agents and abutment surface area.
    Carnaggio TV; Conrad R; Engelmeier RL; Gerngross P; Paravina R; Perezous L; Powers JM
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Oct; 21(7):523-8. PubMed ID: 22469271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of axial wall modification on the retention of cement-retained, implant-supported crowns.
    Tan KM; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Limkangwalmongkol P; Romberg E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Feb; 107(2):80-5. PubMed ID: 22304741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of abutment height and surface roughness on in vitro retention of three luting agents.
    Cano-Batalla J; Soliva-Garriga J; Campillo-Funollet M; Munoz-Viveros CA; Giner-Tarrida L
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 22299076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of 3 luting agents on retention of implant-supported crowns on 2 different abutments.
    Güncü MB; Cakan U; Canay S
    Implant Dent; 2011 Oct; 20(5):349-53. PubMed ID: 21811170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cementable implant crowns composed of cast superstructure frameworks luted to electroformed primary copings: an in vitro retention study.
    Di Felice R; Rappelli G; Camaioni E; Cattani M; Meyer JM; Belser UC
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Feb; 18(1):108-13. PubMed ID: 17224031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of Metal Extension of Crown in the Screw Access Channel of a Posterior Implant Abutment on the Retention of Cement Retained Prosthesis.
    Biyani R; Ali M; Belles D; Powers JM
    J Oral Implantol; 2015 Oct; 41(5):537-41. PubMed ID: 23981084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of digitizing techniques on the fit of implant-retained crowns with different antirotational abutment features.
    Aktas G; Özcan N; Aydin DH; Şahin E; Akça K
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 May; 111(5):367-72. PubMed ID: 24360015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A classification system to measure the implant-abutment microgap.
    Kano SC; Binon PP; Curtis DA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):879-85. PubMed ID: 18271368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Discrepancies in marginal and internal fits for different metal and alumina infrastructures cemented on implant abutments.
    Faot F; Suzuki D; Senna PM; da Silva WJ; de Mattias Sartori IA
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2015 Jun; 123(3):215-9. PubMed ID: 25809785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Marginal fit of cemented and screw-retained crowns incorporated on the Straumann (ITI) Dental Implant System: an in vitro study.
    Tosches NA; Brägger U; Lang NP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jan; 20(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 19126111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vitro vertical misfit evaluation of cast frameworks for cement-retained implant-supported partial prostheses.
    Oyagüe RC; Turrión AS; Toledano M; Monticelli F; Osorio R
    J Dent; 2009 Jan; 37(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 18951675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The comparison of provisional luting agents and abutment surface roughness on the retention of provisional implant-supported crowns.
    Kim Y; Yamashita J; Shotwell JL; Chong KH; Wang HL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):450-5. PubMed ID: 16765158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of abutment taper, length and cement type on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations.
    Bernal G; Okamura M; Muñoz CA
    J Prosthodont; 2003 Jun; 12(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 12964683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Retentiveness of dental cements used with metallic implant components.
    Squier RS; Agar JR; Duncan JP; Taylor TD
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(6):793-8. PubMed ID: 11769829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of abutment height and thermocycling on retrievability of cemented implant-supported crowns.
    Mehl C; Harder S; Shahriari A; Steiner M; Kern M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(5):1106-15. PubMed ID: 23057023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Retention of cast crown copings cemented to implant abutments.
    Dudley JE; Richards LC; Abbott JR
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):332-9. PubMed ID: 19133949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fit of metal ceramic crowns cast in Au-1.6 wt% Ti alloy for different abutment finish line curvature.
    Tao J; Yoda M; Kimura K; Okuno O
    Dent Mater; 2006 May; 22(5):397-404. PubMed ID: 16038971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vitro influence of ultrasonic stress, removal force preload and thermocycling on the retrievability of implant-retained crowns.
    Mehl C; Harder S; Schwarz D; Steiner M; Vollrath O; Kern M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Aug; 23(8):930-7. PubMed ID: 21722192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An in vitro assessment of circumferential grooves on the retention of cement-retained implant-supported crowns.
    Lewinstein I; Block L; Lehr Z; Ormianer Z; Matalon S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Dec; 106(6):367-72. PubMed ID: 22133393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.