These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23551923)

  • 1. Sagittal condylar angle and gender differences.
    Alshali RZ; Yar R; Barclay C; Satterthwaite JD
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Oct; 22(7):561-565. PubMed ID: 23551923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measurements of the sagittal condylar inclination: intraindividual variations.
    Cimić S; Simunković SK; Badel T; Dulcić N; Alajbeg I; Catić A
    Cranio; 2014 Apr; 32(2):104-9. PubMed ID: 24839721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative tests of arbitrary and kinematic transverse horizontal axis recordings of mandibular movements.
    Bernhardt O; Küppers N; Rosin M; Meyer G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):175-9. PubMed ID: 12616238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. ARTICULATOR-RELATED REGISTRATION AND ANALYSIS OF SAGITTAL CONDYLAR INCLINATION.
    Cimić S; Simunković SK; Suncana Simonić Kocijan ; Matijević J; Dulcić N; Catić A
    Acta Clin Croat; 2015 Dec; 54(4):432-7. PubMed ID: 27017716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of condylar guidance setting obtained from a wax record versus an extraoral tracing: a pilot study.
    dos Santos J; Nelson S; Nowlin T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jan; 89(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 12589287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Recording sagittal condylar angles using a mandibular facebow.
    Johnson A; Winstanley RB
    J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Dec; 24(12):904-8. PubMed ID: 9467992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The reliability of computerized condylar path angle assessment.
    Schierz O; Klinger N; Schön G; Reissmann DR
    Int J Comput Dent; 2014; 17(1):35-51. PubMed ID: 24791464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparative study to evaluate the discrepancy in condylar guidance values between two commercially available arcon and non-arcon articulators: a clinical study.
    Goyal MK; Goyal S
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):880. PubMed ID: 22484898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Symmetry of horizontal and sagittal condylar path angles: an in vivo study.
    Hernandez AI; Jasinevicius TR; Kaleinikova Z; Sadan A
    Cranio; 2010 Jan; 28(1):60-6. PubMed ID: 20158010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Sagittal Condylar Paths in Edentulous Patients: Analysis with Computerized Axiography.
    Hue O
    Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 26757321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The horizontal condylar inclination: clinical comparison of different recording methods.
    Boulos PJ; Adib SM; Naltchayan LJ
    Gen Dent; 2007; 55(2):112-6. PubMed ID: 17333981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Standard and limit values for the symmetry of articulation parameters in the temporomandibular joint area - evaluations of the associated project of the SHIP study.
    Kordaß B; Bernhardt O; Ruge S; Ratzmann A; Hugger S; Hugger A
    Int J Comput Dent; 2019; 22(4):353-362. PubMed ID: 31840143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computerized axiographic evaluation of the changes in sagittal condylar path inclination with dental and physical development.
    Baqaien MA; Barra J; Muessig D
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jan; 135(1):88-94. PubMed ID: 19121506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A clinical comparative study of Cadiax Compact II and intraoral records using wax and addition silicone.
    Torabi K; Pour SR; Ahangari AH; Ghodsi S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(6):541-3. PubMed ID: 25390868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the Cadiax Compact® II accuracy in recording preadjusted condylar inclinations on fully adjustable articulator.
    Ahangari AH; Torabi K; Pour SR; Ghodsi S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Jul; 13(4):504-8. PubMed ID: 23151700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Changes in condylar path inclination during maximum protrusion between the ages of 6 and 12 years.
    Baqaien MA; Al-Salti FM; Muessig D
    J Oral Rehabil; 2007 Jan; 34(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 17207075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Condylar guidance: correlation between protrusive interocclusal record and panoramic radiographic image: a pilot study.
    Tannamala PK; Pulagam M; Pottem SR; Swapna B
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Apr; 21(3):181-4. PubMed ID: 22339685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of condylar translation by sonography versus axiography in orthognathic surgery patients.
    Landes CA; Sterz M
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Dec; 61(12):1410-7. PubMed ID: 14663805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sagittal Condylar Inclination and Transversal Condylar Inclination in Different Skeletal Classes.
    Lewandowska A; Mańka-Malara K; Kostrzewa-Janicka J
    J Clin Med; 2022 May; 11(9):. PubMed ID: 35566792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Correlation of condylar kinematics in children with gender, facial type and weight.
    Reicheneder C; Kardari Z; Proff P; Fanghaenel J; Faltermeier A; Römer P
    Ann Anat; 2013 May; 195(3):243-7. PubMed ID: 23484954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.