BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23552709)

  • 1. Impact of minimally invasive surgery on medical spending and employee absenteeism.
    Epstein AJ; Groeneveld PW; Harhay MO; Yang F; Polsky D
    JAMA Surg; 2013 Jul; 148(7):641-7. PubMed ID: 23552709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of minimally invasive surgery on the risk for surgical site infections: results from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) Database.
    Gandaglia G; Ghani KR; Sood A; Meyers JR; Sammon JD; Schmid M; Varda B; Briganti A; Montorsi F; Sun M; Menon M; Kibel AS; Trinh QD
    JAMA Surg; 2014 Oct; 149(10):1039-44. PubMed ID: 25143176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Workplace absenteeism amongst patients undergoing open vs. robotic radical prostatectomy, hysterectomy, and partial colectomy.
    Pucheril D; Fletcher SA; Chen X; Friedlander DF; Cole AP; Krimphove MJ; Fields AC; Melnitchouk N; Kibel AS; Dasgupta P; Trinh QD
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Apr; 35(4):1644-1650. PubMed ID: 32291540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patterns of care for radical prostatectomy in the United States from 2003 to 2005.
    Hu JC; Hevelone ND; Ferreira MD; Lipsitz SR; Choueiri TK; Sanda MG; Earle CC
    J Urol; 2008 Nov; 180(5):1969-74. PubMed ID: 18801512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Open abdominal versus laparoscopic and vaginal hysterectomy: analysis of a large United States payer measuring quality and cost of care.
    Warren L; Ladapo JA; Borah BJ; Gunnarsson CL
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2009; 16(5):581-8. PubMed ID: 19835801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of Out-of-Pocket Costs for Robotic Cancer Surgery in US Adults.
    Nabi J; Friedlander DF; Chen X; Cole AP; Hu JC; Kibel AS; Dasgupta P; Trinh QD
    JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Jan; 3(1):e1919185. PubMed ID: 31940036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Recovery from minimally invasive vs. open surgery in kidney cancer patients: Opioid use and workplace absenteeism.
    Krimphove MJ; Reese SW; Chen X; Marchese M; Pucheril D; Cone E; Chou W; Tully KH; Kibel AS; Urman RD; Chang SL; Kluth LA; Dasgupta P; Trinh QD
    Investig Clin Urol; 2021 Jan; 62(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 33314804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative effectiveness, cost, and utilization of radical prostatectomy among young men within managed care insurance plans.
    Shih YC; Ward JF; Pettaway CA; Xu Y; Matin SF; Davis JW; Thompson BP; Elting LS
    Value Health; 2012; 15(2):367-75. PubMed ID: 22433769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open radical prostatectomy: results from the nationwide inpatient sample.
    Trinh QD; Sammon J; Sun M; Ravi P; Ghani KR; Bianchi M; Jeong W; Shariat SF; Hansen J; Schmitges J; Jeldres C; Rogers CG; Peabody JO; Montorsi F; Menon M; Karakiewicz PI
    Eur Urol; 2012 Apr; 61(4):679-85. PubMed ID: 22206800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minimally invasive versus conventional mitral valve surgery: a propensity-matched comparison.
    Svensson LG; Atik FA; Cosgrove DM; Blackstone EH; Rajeswaran J; Krishnaswamy G; Jin U; Gillinov AM; Griffin B; Navia JL; Mihaljevic T; Lytle BW
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2010 Apr; 139(4):926-32.e1-2. PubMed ID: 19945121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Antegrade and retrograde arterial perfusion strategy in minimally invasive mitral-valve surgery: a propensity score analysis on 1280 patients.
    Murzi M; Cerillo AG; Miceli A; Bevilacqua S; Kallushi E; Farneti P; Solinas M; Glauber M
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2013 Jun; 43(6):e167-72. PubMed ID: 23404687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Factors associated with the adoption of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy in the United States.
    Ulmer WD; Prasad SM; Kowalczyk KJ; Gu X; Dodgion C; Lipsitz S; Palapattu GS; Choueiri TK; Hu JC
    J Urol; 2012 Sep; 188(3):775-80. PubMed ID: 22818134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Minimally invasive surgery and its impact on 30-day postoperative complications, unplanned readmissions and mortality.
    Sood A; Meyer CP; Abdollah F; Sammon JD; Sun M; Lipsitz SR; Hollis M; Weissman JS; Menon M; Trinh QD
    Br J Surg; 2017 Sep; 104(10):1372-1381. PubMed ID: 28632890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative effectiveness of perineal versus retropubic and minimally invasive radical prostatectomy.
    Prasad SM; Gu X; Lavelle R; Lipsitz SR; Hu JC
    J Urol; 2011 Jan; 185(1):111-5. PubMed ID: 21074198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of a gynecologist-interventional radiologist relationship on selection of treatment modality for the patient with uterine myoma.
    Zurawin RK; Fischer JH; Amir L
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(2):214-21. PubMed ID: 20226411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acute hospital costs after minimally invasive versus open lumbar interbody fusion: data from a US national database with 6106 patients.
    Wang MY; Lerner J; Lesko J; McGirt MJ
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Aug; 25(6):324-8. PubMed ID: 21685806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Financial comparative analysis of minimally invasive surgery to open surgery for localized prostate cancer: a single-institution experience.
    Mouraviev V; Nosnik I; Sun L; Robertson CN; Walther P; Albala D; Moul JW; Polascik TJ
    Urology; 2007 Feb; 69(2):311-4. PubMed ID: 17320670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The economic impact of GERD and PUD: examination of direct and indirect costs using a large integrated employer claims database.
    Joish VN; Donaldson G; Stockdale W; Oderda GM; Crawley J; Sasane R; Joshua-Gotlib S; Brixner DI
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2005 Apr; 21(4):535-44. PubMed ID: 15899102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Outcomes of less invasive J-incision approach to aortic valve surgery.
    Johnston DR; Atik FA; Rajeswaran J; Blackstone EH; Nowicki ER; Sabik JF; Mihaljevic T; Gillinov AM; Lytle BW; Svensson LG
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Oct; 144(4):852-858.e3. PubMed ID: 22244556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Experience with more than 500 minimally invasive hepatic procedures.
    Buell JF; Thomas MT; Rudich S; Marvin M; Nagubandi R; Ravindra KV; Brock G; McMasters KM
    Ann Surg; 2008 Sep; 248(3):475-86. PubMed ID: 18791368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.