These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2355342)

  • 21. Hitting the bull's eye rather than shooting yourself between the eyes.
    Froman RD
    Res Nurs Health; 2008 Oct; 31(5):399-401. PubMed ID: 18613067
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The manuscript review process of nursing journals.
    Swanson E; McCloskey JC
    Image (IN); 1982 Oct; 14(3):72-6. PubMed ID: 6922826
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Writing for publication.
    Duff D
    Axone; 2001 Jun; 22(4):36-9. PubMed ID: 14621504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Winning funds for nursing research.
    Baines EM
    Nursingconnections; 1989; 2(2):5-11. PubMed ID: 2761642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Peering into the review process.
    Nat Struct Biol; 2000 Dec; 7(12):1075-6. PubMed ID: 11101879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A new template for referees and guidance on writing high quality papers.
    Goodsitt MM; Das SK; Williamson JF
    Med Phys; 2016 Aug; 43(8):4465. PubMed ID: 27487861
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The peer review process.
    Wolf LA
    J Emerg Nurs; 2016 Sep; 42(5):454-6. PubMed ID: 27594079
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Consider the source.
    Mason DJ
    Am J Nurs; 2009 Apr; 109(4):7. PubMed ID: 19325281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Don't send it yet! Getting your manuscript ready to submit.
    Robinson R; Rivers DL
    Nurse Author Ed; 2003; 13(4):1-4. PubMed ID: 14562511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Peer review: guerir quelquefois, soulager souvent, consoler toujours.
    Martin GI
    J Perinatol; 1991 Mar; 11(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 2037880
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Experimenting with peer review.
    Jabri E
    ACS Chem Biol; 2006 Jul; 1(6):325-6. PubMed ID: 17163762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Peer review--the newcomers' perspective.
    Mainguy G; Motamedi MR; Mietchen D
    PLoS Biol; 2005 Sep; 3(9):e326. PubMed ID: 16149851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Biomedical review articles: what editors want from authors and peer reviewers.
    Squires BP
    CMAJ; 1989 Aug; 141(3):195-7. PubMed ID: 2752346
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Harefuah peer review].
    Shemer Y; Shoenfeld Y
    Harefuah; 2001 May; 140(5):403-5. PubMed ID: 11419062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Pretentious and deified papers].
    Amato Neto V
    Rev Soc Bras Med Trop; 2003; 36(2):305-6. PubMed ID: 12806469
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Medical writing.
    Grange RI; Vale J; Williams G; Whitfield HN
    BJU Int; 2004 Jul; 94(2):225-31. PubMed ID: 15217414
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Information for peer reviewers.
    Huston P
    CMAJ; 1994 Apr; 150(8):1211-22. PubMed ID: 8162544
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Advice for authors. Four principal reasons for manuscript rejection].
    Clarke SP
    Perspect Infirm; 2006; 3(3):35-9. PubMed ID: 16480058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Quality of manuscript reviews in nursing research.
    Henly SJ; Dougherty MC
    Nurs Outlook; 2009; 57(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 19150263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [How to write a scientific article: how to get your research published].
    Elizondo-Rivera RL; Bosques-Padilla FJ
    Rev Gastroenterol Mex; 2007; 72(2):113-6. PubMed ID: 17966370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.