These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23553436)

  • 1. A note on the evaluation of novel biomarkers: do not rely on integrated discrimination improvement and net reclassification index.
    Hilden J; Gerds TA
    Stat Med; 2014 Aug; 33(19):3405-14. PubMed ID: 23553436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inference for reclassification statistics under nested and non-nested models for biomarker evaluation.
    Shao F; Li J; Fine J; Wong WK; Pencina M
    Biomarkers; 2015; 20(4):240-52. PubMed ID: 26301882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multicategory reclassification statistics for assessing improvements in diagnostic accuracy.
    Li J; Jiang B; Fine JP
    Biostatistics; 2013 Apr; 14(2):382-94. PubMed ID: 23197381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Asymptotic distribution of ∆AUC, NRIs, and IDI based on theory of U-statistics.
    Demler OV; Pencina MJ; Cook NR; D'Agostino RB
    Stat Med; 2017 Sep; 36(21):3334-3360. PubMed ID: 28627112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of polygenic risk models using multiple performance measures: a critical assessment of discordant results.
    Martens FK; Tonk ECM; Janssens ACJW
    Genet Med; 2019 Feb; 21(2):391-397. PubMed ID: 29895851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. What to expect from net reclassification improvement with three categories.
    Pencina KM; Pencina MJ; D'Agostino RB
    Stat Med; 2014 Dec; 33(28):4975-87. PubMed ID: 25176621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating the effect of multiple genetic risk score models on colorectal cancer risk prediction.
    Xin J; Chu H; Ben S; Ge Y; Shao W; Zhao Y; Wei Y; Ma G; Li S; Gu D; Zhang Z; Du M; Wang M
    Gene; 2018 Oct; 673():174-180. PubMed ID: 29908285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Simpson's paradox in the integrated discrimination improvement.
    Chipman J; Braun D
    Stat Med; 2017 Dec; 36(28):4468-4481. PubMed ID: 29160558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The power-integrated discriminant improvement: An accurate measure of the incremental predictive value of additional biomarkers.
    Hayashi K; Eguchi S
    Stat Med; 2019 Jun; 38(14):2589-2604. PubMed ID: 30859601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Net Reclassification Index and Integrated Discrimination Index Are Not Appropriate for Testing Whether a Biomarker Improves Predictive Performance.
    Burch PM; Glaab WE; Holder DJ; Phillips JA; Sauer JM; Walker EG
    Toxicol Sci; 2017 Mar; 156(1):11-13. PubMed ID: 27815493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prognostic relevance of baseline pro- and anti-inflammatory markers in STEMI: an APEX AMI substudy.
    van Diepen S; Newby LK; Lopes RD; Stebbins A; Hasselblad V; James S; Roe MT; Ezekowitz JA; Moliterno DJ; Neumann FJ; Reist C; Mahaffey KW; Hochman JS; Hamm CW; Armstrong PW; Granger CB; Theroux P;
    Int J Cardiol; 2013 Oct; 168(3):2127-33. PubMed ID: 23394896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. New metrics for assessing diagnostic potential of candidate biomarkers.
    Pickering JW; Endre ZH
    Clin J Am Soc Nephrol; 2012 Aug; 7(8):1355-64. PubMed ID: 22679181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Discriminative ability, reclassification and net benefit: the predictive value of biomarkers].
    Steyerberg EW; Pencina MJ; Van Calster B
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2012; 156(41):A5029. PubMed ID: 23062255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating a New Risk Marker's Predictive Contribution in Survival Models.
    Liu M; Kapadia AS; Etzel CJ
    J Stat Theory Pract; 2010 Dec; 4(4):845-855. PubMed ID: 22984361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Combining risk markers improves cardiovascular risk prediction in women.
    Holewijn S; den Heijer M; Kiemeney LA; Stalenhoef AF; de Graaf J
    Clin Sci (Lond); 2014 Jan; 126(2):139-46. PubMed ID: 23879211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measures for evaluation of prognostic improvement under multivariate normality for nested and nonnested models.
    Enserro DM; Demler OV; Pencina MJ; D'Agostino RB
    Stat Med; 2019 Sep; 38(20):3817-3831. PubMed ID: 31211443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Performance of reclassification statistics in comparing risk prediction models.
    Cook NR; Paynter NP
    Biom J; 2011 Mar; 53(2):237-58. PubMed ID: 21294152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Graphical assessment of incremental value of novel markers in prediction models: From statistical to decision analytical perspectives.
    Steyerberg EW; Vedder MM; Leening MJ; Postmus D; D'Agostino RB; Van Calster B; Pencina MJ
    Biom J; 2015 Jul; 57(4):556-70. PubMed ID: 25042996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bayesian reclassification statistics for assessing improvements in diagnostic accuracy.
    Huang Z; Li J; Cheng CY; Cheung C; Wong TY
    Stat Med; 2016 Jul; 35(15):2574-92. PubMed ID: 26875442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Net Reclassification Index (NRI): a Misleading Measure of Prediction Improvement Even with Independent Test Data Sets.
    Pepe MS; Fan J; Feng Z; Gerds T; Hilden J
    Stat Biosci; 2015 Oct; 7(2):282-295. PubMed ID: 26504496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.