These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23553995)

  • 1. Statistical reporting deficiencies in environmental toxicology.
    Bosker T; Mudge JF; Munkittrick KR
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2013 Aug; 32(8):1737-9. PubMed ID: 23553995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Power, effects, confidence, and significance: an investigation of statistical practices in nursing research.
    Gaskin CJ; Happell B
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2014 May; 51(5):795-806. PubMed ID: 24207028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Moving Beyond p < 0.05 in Ecotoxicology: A Guide for Practitioners.
    Erickson RA; Rattner BA
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2020 Sep; 39(9):1657-1669. PubMed ID: 32539165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What training and skills will the ecotoxicologists of the future require?
    Harris MJ; Huggett DB; Staveley JP; Sumpter JP
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Jul; 13(4):580-584. PubMed ID: 27935241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The positive approach to negative results in toxicology studies.
    Hayes JP
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 1987 Aug; 14(1):73-7. PubMed ID: 3428208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Selecting the best design for nonstandard toxicology experiments.
    Webb JM; Smucker BJ; Bailer AJ
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2014 Oct; 33(10):2399-406. PubMed ID: 24943385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comment on ET&C perspectives, November 2015-A holistic view.
    Fox DR; Landis WG
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2016 Jun; 35(6):1337-9. PubMed ID: 27216838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Meeting the challenge of the Psychonomic Society's 2012 Guidelines on Statistical Issues: Some success and some room for improvement.
    Morris PE; Fritz CO
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Dec; 24(6):2037-2043. PubMed ID: 28315170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The crab Carcinus maenas as a suitable experimental model in ecotoxicology.
    Rodrigues ET; Pardal MÂ
    Environ Int; 2014 Sep; 70():158-82. PubMed ID: 24934856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomonitoring for occupational health risk assessment (BOHRA).
    Manno M; Viau C; ; Cocker J; Colosio C; Lowry L; Mutti A; Nordberg M; Wang S
    Toxicol Lett; 2010 Jan; 192(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 19446015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An assessment of recently published gene expression data analyses: reporting experimental design and statistical factors.
    Jafari P; Azuaje F
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2006 Jun; 6():27. PubMed ID: 16790051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predictive toxicology and ecotoxicology within the ANTIOPES network.
    Lemazurier E; Marano F
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2013 May; 20(5):2689-91. PubMed ID: 23354612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Statistical significance testing and p-values: Defending the indefensible? A discussion paper and position statement.
    Griffiths P; Needleman J
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2019 Nov; 99():103384. PubMed ID: 31442781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reporting and reproducibility: Proteomics of fish models in environmental toxicology and ecotoxicology.
    Henke AN; Chilukuri S; Langan LM; Brooks BW
    Sci Total Environ; 2024 Feb; 912():168455. PubMed ID: 37979845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Type II (beta) errors in the hand literature: the importance of power.
    Chung KC; Kalliainen LK; Hayward RA
    J Hand Surg Am; 1998 Jan; 23(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 9523949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The drive to ban the NOEC/LOEC in favor of ECx is misguided and misinformed.
    Green JW; Springer TA; Staveley JP
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2013 Jan; 9(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 22991182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of statistical procedures used in papers in the Australian Veterinary Journal.
    McCance I
    Aust Vet J; 1995 Sep; 72(9):322-8. PubMed ID: 8585846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Second symposium on Environmental Toxicology in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany-interdisciplinary research activities in toxicology, statistics, hygiene and medicine: meeting report on a symposium held in Dortmund May 19-20, 2011.
    Golka K; Ickstadt K; Selinski S; Hengstler JG; Wilhelm M
    Arch Toxicol; 2013 Mar; 87(3):555-61. PubMed ID: 23385958
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of criticism of null-hypothesis significance testing on statistical reporting practices in conservation biology.
    Fidler F; Burgman MA; Cumming G; Buttrose R; Thomason N
    Conserv Biol; 2006 Oct; 20(5):1539-44. PubMed ID: 17002771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pervasive errors in hypothesis testing: Toward better statistical practice in nursing research.
    Staggs VS
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2019 Oct; 98():87-93. PubMed ID: 31349121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.